i own a fns 9....but have played and shot a friends fnx 9. very similar guns, imho.
i prefer hammers and so i like his better.....but mine works well enough....so i've seen no reason to add one to my collection.
this is kinda a case of what do you want hammer or striker....there are some other nit picking kind of things to debate over, but for the most part it's hammer or striker.
is that true, is the fns based on the s&w sigma...isn't the sigma based on the glock to the point of a lawsuit over patent infringement years ago? are we just talking striker designs and little bit more, or much more than that? thanks much.