Sindawe
Member
Judge: Parents can't teach pagan beliefsAmendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
Father appeals order in divorce decree that prevents couple from exposing son to Wicca.
Challenging the court: Thomas E. Jones Jr. says a judge's order tramples on his and his ex-wife's constitutional right to share their religious beliefs with their son. -- Frank Espich / The Star
By Kevin Corcoran
[email protected]
An Indianapolis father is appealing a Marion County judge's unusual order that prohibits him and his ex-wife from exposing their child to "non-mainstream religious beliefs and rituals."
The parents practice Wicca, a contemporary pagan religion that emphasizes a balance in nature and reverence for the earth.
Cale J. Bradford, chief judge of the Marion Superior Court, kept the unusual provision in the couple's divorce decree last year over their fierce objections, court records show. The order does not define a mainstream religion.
Bradford refused to remove the provision after the 9-year-old boy's outraged parents, Thomas E. Jones Jr. and his ex-wife, Tammie U. Bristol, protested last fall.
Contines at: http://www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20050526/NEWS01/505260481
==============================
While it is not Congress making a law baring an exercise of religion here but the judge, it still comes down to an agent of the .gov moving to limit a protected right of the people. Neither parent has issue with the child being exposed to their religion, and from the article the parochial school the child attends has not objected either. If this is allowed to stand, what is to prevent some judge from baring divorced parents who happen to be part of the snake dancing sect of Christianity (sorry, don't recall their name off hand) from taking their children to worship? How about those who are members of the ultra-orthodox Jewish sects? Or those who are Buddhists? Or those who are Muslum?
IANAL, but to my eyes this is clearly a violation of the First Amendment.