Frist not running for Senate reelection in 2006

Status
Not open for further replies.
Rumor has it that Frist will run for President for the 2008 election. He will need 2007 and 2008 to campaign and raise money and support. Have no idea what his RKBA credentials are.
 
Frist has a D from the GOA.

I believe that rating is based upon 2003. The GOP, one way or the other, warded off some nasty gun control legislation in 2004, and Frist was right in the middle of it. I would guess that Frist would get some credit in his 2004 rating update. Either way, he wouldn't be reliably pro-gun, pro-2A, or pro-Constitution, not that there is any real difference.

I think he is a natural to run for President and to win handily in red States. He is not my ideal candidate, because he is too much a social conservative and, of course, not solid at all on what the 2A means. Either that or he doesn't always vote his conscience. He is absolutely a political party animal, so what can I say. He led the 2004 GOP platform committee, much of the proceedings of which I watched, and I was very disappointed in whole thing. His leadership skills were impeccable, but the output of the committee was unacceptable, all about family values and little about tough essentials-only, strictly constitutional government.
 
Frist has a D from the GOA.

Great, maybe we can have another born again gun rights candidate running for office. Didn't that clown Kerry try this?

I believe that rating is based upon 2003. The GOP, one way or the other, warded off some nasty gun control legislation in 2004, and Frist was right in the middle of it.

I listened to that debate in 2004, I didn't hear Frist speak. Senator Larry Craig was leading the effort to defeat that legislation, and did a great job. If Frist was pulling his strings it sure wasn't obvious.
 
Frist didn't say much in the first debate; but he had a lot to say in the second (in July 2004 when Feinstein planned to attach the AWB renewal to the Tort Reform legislation being debated).

In July 2004, Frist "filled the tree" and used an obscure procedural move to stop any amendments from being offered on the Tort Reform bill. GOA had criticized him for not doing it during the February-March debates on Frivolous Lawsuit protection and outlined the procedure he could have used to stop poison pills from being added to the bill.

The only time Frist used that method was that one time. I can't read his mind, so I don't know for sure he did it to stop the AWB renewal from being amended to the Tort Reform bill or whether some other legislation prompted this action; but I know he followed the playbook GOA laid out in its March criticism exactly and I expect you'll see a much higher grade from GOA for 2004.
 
Good riddance. Washington, D.C. is packed to the rafters with R.I.N.O.s.

But not prominent heart surgeons (Dr. Bill Frist) who use Senate breaks to be a doctor in humanitarian situations, mostly out of the country. We are talking about a pretty high quality guy who has made himself available for public service.

I take it that for you R.I.N.O means "not libertarian", in effect. Republican is as Republican does. There is no such thing as RINO. It is kinda like THR only being as good as its subscribers, few if any meeting an absolute standard, and no one rightfully claiming to define the eligible demographics or precise politics of the group. If I said I was Republican, you would know relatively little about my politics.
 
Ed Bryant is running for that seat and he is the most pro-gun person we could get in there. He also was one of the House Impeachment Managers against Clinton.
 
Frist is (IMHO) pretty representative of the Republican mainstream at the moment. For those agitating about his lower-than-we-would-like gun support rating: remember that we're a tiny - repeat, TINY - minority in the US political scene. The vast majority of American voters (probably 90%+) don't give the Second Amendment anywhere near the priority we do. They would probably regard any "purist" 2A approach as being very right-wing, and out of step with the majority of Republicans - and they'd be right!

Face it, folks. I don't believe we will ever get a Presidential candidate out of the two major parties who is simultaneously entirely to our liking from a 2A perspective, and entirely acceptable to the majority of his/her party on other issues. The closest possible candidate at the moment is Dr. Condoleeza Rice, and AFAIK she's expressed no interest in elected office.
 
I have heard he is returning to medicine, not trying to run for the Presidency.

He won't win if he runs for president.

He has the personality of a pancake, and no more sex appeal than Cheney.

Not too bad of a guy in general, but the Senate is as far as he will go.
 
I have heard he is returning to medicine, not trying to run for the Presidency.

That is until he gets a request from the party to be a candidate and assesses his support. No one admits to being a candidate until the deal is set up.


He won't win if he runs for president.

Disagree. Wonder about your reasoning.

He has the personality of a pancake, and no more sex appeal than Cheney.

He is young, fit, good looking, well dressed and well groomed. He's a natural. Good looking and wealthy is pretty sexy, if you ask the ladies instead of the guys. Unfortunately, this matters.

Not too bad of a guy in general, but the Senate is as far as he will go.

We'll see. If you look at the possible GOP candidates, he is high on the list as THE senior operative in the government below the President, ignoring Cheney. He also has no direct association with the administration, a major problem for Condi Rice or any other Cabinet member. They would be caught up in Bush bashing by the Dems in an election campaign. Any GOP candidate will have it bad enough, but members of the Bush administration are dead meat politically, when projecting where sentiments will be when an election campaign begins. We have had a preview in the Senate hearings re new Cabinet member appointments. The Dems will either implode with their pretense of being objective or they will increasingly be taken seriously. The partisan bickering is shameful, but it remains to be seen if it is effective.
 
He has the personality of a pancake, and no more sex appeal than Cheney.


Hey now! Don't be dissin' Cheney. A guy who owns machine guns has to be sexy!
 
Too bad his name's Frist. That won't look good on campain stickers and signs, etc. These things make a difference.
 
I believe that rating is based upon 2003. The GOP, one way or the other, warded off some nasty gun control legislation in 2004,


No, he didn't do anything of the kind.

Frist deliberately allowed strongly anti-gun amendments to be added to pro-gun legislation in order to force the pro-gun side to kill that legislation. The debacle that was the Lawfull Commerce in Firearms Act is a perfect example. Frist opposed this legislation and deliberately handed the RKBA community a solid defeat and a huge setback when he allowed anti-gun amendments from the Democrats to be added to the bill. Something he could have eaisly stopped.

As has been said, good riddence to this RINO. If only Warner, McCain, Snow, Luger, etc. would also take the hint.
 
Frist deliberately allowed strongly anti-gun amendments to be added to pro-gun legislation in order to force the pro-gun side to kill that legislation.

Pure conjecture. As a doctor, you don't think Frist would support the concept of limiting frivolous lawsuits? You don't think the Senate majority leader would support a majority party administration initiative (lawsuit protection for gun manufacturers (defense contractors))?

I think it has already been explained how GOA subsequently provided a method to ward off similar amendment trees in the future.
 
Pure conjecture. As a doctor, you don't think Frist would support the concept of limiting frivolous lawsuits? You don't think the Senate majority leader would support a majority party administration initiative (lawsuit protection for gun manufacturers (defense contractors))?

There's nothing speculative about my depiction of Frist's actions re: the Lawfull Commerce in Firearms Act (LCFA). It's an accurate recital of the facts. Frist did actively refuse to prevent the Democrat amendments from coming up for a vote, something he could have easily done under the Senate Rules. Frist must have known that an AWB renewal amendment to the LFCA would kill it.

I believe Frist's background as an M.D. would lead him to support gun control in preference to tort reform.

Frist handed us a major defeat at the hands of Finestein et al. when he deliberately allowed the LCFA to be laden with poison pill amendments.

Frist is NO friend of RKBA. He is merely another RINO paying lip-service to RKBA. He is not worthy of support anymore than is John Warner.
 
Last edited:
Frist did actively refuse to prevent the Democrat amendments from coming up for a vote,

You say it's a fact, but I believe it is unsubstantiated.

something he could have easily done under the Senate Rules

No, actually GOA had to suggest a strategy to use in the future. Later in the same year they started making it a requirement on some bills that amendments have majority sponsorship before coming to the floor and consuming time.

Frist must have known that an AWB renewal amendment to the LFCA would kill it.

Those proposals were already on the active list. It wouldn't take a genius to project that a gun related bill would draw in all the other gun issues. Knowing that, there had already been a directive from the WH to send a "clean bill".

My guess is that Frist avoided a blatant power play by the majority. That during a time when the two parties were pretending to work together and get something accomplished. There is the same dilemma now as they try to figure out how to deal with minority filibustering of judicial appointments.

I believe Frist's background as an M.D. would lead him to support gun control in preference to tort reform.

A guess for sure. All I know is that my nurse friend says she was surprised to learn that half the staff at the hospital, including surgeons, were packing. I would think that a doctor with his own practice would be keenly aware of the need for insurance and what it covered.

Frist handed us a major defeat at the hands of Finestein et al. when he deliberately allowed the LCFA to be laden with poison pill amendments.

Viewed in a longer term, defeat of that bill allowed the Dems to portray themselves as very anti-gun in an election year and very shortly before the campaign got serious. I would say that the gun vote was pretty well solidified by that debacle. Gun owners who didn't give a rap about ugly rifles suddenly accepted them as the Holy Grail of gun rights and suddenly on their wish lists. If anything, it allowed the gun vote to be important, so I wouldn't call that a defeat. That may not have been the plan, but I'll take the result. Feinstein gambled and lost by making her AWB renewal bill an amendment to another issue.

They all knew the bill would ultimately fail or be vetoed (not "clean"), so it was just ceremony, so they could all make speeches and test or demonize the gun lobby, pro and con.

Frist is NO friend of RKBA. He is merely another RINO paying lip-service to RKBA.

No argument about him being pro-gun. I don't know that he said much of anything. He isn't a RINO though. He is the epitome of what Republican currently means. They are all RINOs if they have to meet some archaic notion of what the standard of being Republican is.
 
No, I was following the Lawful Commerce Act pretty closely back in March of last year, and that's a fair description of what happened; First they got a procedural vote that barred amendments, then the leadership struck a behind the scenes deal to waive that rule, and allow them anyway, and then Frist quite deliberately didn't use the power he had to bar non-germane amendments, so that the bill got loaded down with poison pill amendments and had to be killed.

It was a dive, and Frist was part of it. One of those handshake deals where the two parties agree to arrange for votes each party's members want to be able to brag about to their constituents, on the understanding that things will be managed so that nothing actually passes.

Though I suspect that they were actually setting up a trade, of the lawsuit reforms in return for allowing renewal of the ban, and it fell through because people like us were adamant that any vote for the AWB renewal would be political death no matter WHAT excuses they tried to make.
 
Yester Me: Frist did actively refuse to prevent the Democrat amendments from coming up for a vote,

You say it's a fact, but I believe it is unsubstantiated.

Me: Frist has the power to prevent non-relevent amendments. he declined to exercise that power. That's an established fact, he did not utilize this power when he could have and was asked to do so.

Yester Me: something he could have easily done under the Senate Rules

No, actually GOA had to suggest a strategy to use in the future. Later in the same year they started making it a requirement on some bills that amendments have majority sponsorship before coming to the floor and consuming time.

Me: It beleive it was a rule of the Senate at the time that non-relevent amendments could be excluded.

Yester Me: Frist must have known that an AWB renewal amendment to the LFCA would kill it.

My guess is that Frist avoided a blatant power play by the majority. That during a time when the two parties were pretending to work together and get something accomplished. There is the same dilemma now as they try to figure out how to deal with minority filibustering of judicial appointments.

Me: After decades of support from us, which played a substantial role in creating the Republican majority in Congress and the Whitehouse, we deserve a lot more than this.

Yester Me:I believe Frist's background as an M.D. would lead him to support gun control in preference to tort reform.

A guess for sure. All I know is that my nurse friend says she was surprised to learn that half the staff at the hospital, including surgeons, were packing. I would think that a doctor with his own practice would be keenly aware of the need for insurance and what it covered.

Me: I don't understand how this portrays Frist as pro-RKBA. Someone at THR from TN could look up whether Frist has a CHL, but then again so does Diane Fienstein.

Yester Me: Frist handed us a major defeat at the hands of Finestein et al. when he deliberately allowed the LCFA to be laden with poison pill amendments.

Viewed in a longer term, defeat of that bill allowed the Dems to portray themselves as very anti-gun in an election year and very shortly before the campaign got serious. I would say that the gun vote was pretty well solidified by that debacle. Gun owners who didn't give a rap about ugly rifles suddenly accepted them as the Holy Grail of gun rights and suddenly on their wish lists. If anything, it allowed the gun vote to be important, so I wouldn't call that a defeat. That may not have been the plan, but I'll take the result. Feinstein gambled and lost by making her AWB renewal bill an amendment to another issue.

Me: I agree with you here. It did rally the troops. However, at some point we deserve some reward for our support. If the GOP doesn't step up to the plate eventually they're going to see the 2nd Amend. crowd drift off just as the Christian Conservatives are. They have given up on he GOP on Abortion and Gay Marriage. Karl Rove et al. are in for a nasty shock when Christian Conservatives don't show up in '06.

They all knew the bill would ultimately fail or be vetoed (not "clean"), so it was just ceremony, so they could all make speeches and test or demonize the gun lobby, pro and con.

Me: This bill was quite important to us. Bushmaster, and other gun makers are really suffering under the frivolous lawsuits. Frist had the power to send the bill out of committee clean, and have it passed. Remember that the House had already done so. He blew it.

Yester Me: Frist is NO friend of RKBA. He is merely another RINO paying lip-service to RKBA.

No argument about him being pro-gun. I don't know that he said much of anything. He isn't a RINO though. He is the epitome of what Republican currently means. They are all RINOs if they have to meet some archaic notion of what the standard of being Republican is.

Me: I don't see what's archaic about the GOP supporting the issues that they tell their current base (that would be you and me) that they support. If they're going looking for support amongst the suburban soccer mom set at our expense, then we don't need to give them our unqualified support.
 
Last edited:
IIRC several years ago, a gunman shot his way into the Senate Office Building, hummmS>O>B> I hadn't noticed that before. Anyway the gunman and 2 Capital Police Officers were wounded, Frist rendered aid to the gunman who survived, ignoring the police officers who died.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top