Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Frustrating day at the range (M&Ps)...

Discussion in 'Handguns: Autoloaders' started by tydephan, Jul 18, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. tydephan

    tydephan Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2006
    Messages:
    2,142
    Location:
    Huntsville, AL
    So I loaded up my M&P9, M&P40, and AR and headed to my range this afternoon.

    With me, I took some new 223 reloads for my AR, some factory WWB 9mm, and some new 40S&W handloads.

    What followed was one of the most frustrating range sessions I've had in recent memory.

    Let's talk about the M&P40 first.

    I was using some handloaded rounds:
    180gr FN bullets
    Winchester Nickel Brass
    Remington 5 1/2 primers
    4.2gr of Hodgdon Titegroup
    COL - 1.125

    Out of 50 rounds, I experienced 14 failures to fire. All rounds appeared to have a decent strike on the primer. Primers were not seated too deep.

    After the first 5 FTF, I rechambered those rounds and attempted to fire them again. Only one fired on the second chance.

    In contrast, my father fired a box of the same loads from the same loading session out of his Glock 22 and all fired just fine. He also chambered and fired the remaining 9 rounds my M&P originally failed to fire.

    So, I don't know what is wrong.

    Then, my frustration was compounded with the M&P9, which jammed 3 times on 4 mags of rapid fire with WWB ball ammo. All failures were a total failure to eject. As in, the round was still suck in the chamber.

    Both weapons were clean to begin with.

    So my confidence in my M&Ps have been shaken dramatically. I guess I will call Smith Monday morning and talk to them. The M&P40 is one of the first models on the market. Its just now getting broke in good. The M&P9 is one of the earlier models as well.

    This sucks.

    :(
     
  2. The Lone Haranguer

    The Lone Haranguer Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2006
    Messages:
    11,717
    Location:
    Johnson City, TN
    In this case I think the gun did its job and the primers were faulty. Your dad's Glock probably fired those rounds because its firing pin impacts the primer with more force, in a slightly different location or a more concentrated area.
     
  3. Mags

    Mags Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2009
    Messages:
    3,235
    Location:
    Belgium
    My buddy had a M&P45 that striked the primer on one of my reloads and the cartridge did not fire. I believe it to be the primer I was using as it had a fairly good hit from the M&Ps firing pin.
     
  4. rbernie
    • Contributing Member

    rbernie Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2004
    Messages:
    20,657
    Location:
    Norra Texas
    Actually, I would suspect an overly-rolled crimp on the 40S&W handloads that allowed the brass to headspace on the extractor/rim rather than the case mouth. Worth a look-see, anyway. I have run oodles of handloads thru my M&P40 and M&P9 with nary an issue, but I also do not roll-crimp my case mouths..

    The failures to extract on the M&P9 are curious, and a real problem. I cannot recall there being anything systemically wrong with the M&P extractor, so it's possible that yours is chipped or malformed. It's also possible that the WWB was simply out of spec - that happens more than you think - but I'd still look at the gun first just to rule that out.
     
  5. nelson133

    nelson133 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2006
    Messages:
    730
    I have seen a problem with reloads on occasion where the primers weren't seated fully. Some runs of brass have tighter/ deeper primer pockets and the firing pin strike will move the primers enough to soak up some of the impact. Some of my guns fired the stuff anyway and some didn't.
    I also had a problem with an M&P .45 that had crud build up around the firing pin and thus shorten the stroke, cleaning fixed that.
     
  6. MadMercS55

    MadMercS55 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2005
    Messages:
    523
    Location:
    Monroeville, Pennsylvania
    On the M&P .40, If it's one of the first ones to market, chances are it may have some issues. From my reading on the 'net, there is very likely an "upgraded" striker assembly that S&W should provide. I have a very recent production 9mm M&P and I notice the striker channel does get a little more gunk into it than my Glocks ever did. Maybe try cleaning out the striker channel and such?

    For the 9mm, checking the M&P forum reveals that some runs of the 9mm's seem to have rough chambers that would often result in failures to extract. Combined with some extractor tension issues. These issues seem to be easily remedied with a trip back to S&W. Again, these problems seem to be rather sporatic and do not effect every M&P out there, from what I've been reading. I have a couple 9mm fullsize M&P's made 5/2009 and they are flawless, rustless, etc. Seemes the newest ones are the safest bet.
     
  7. earlthegoat2

    earlthegoat2 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2008
    Messages:
    4,514
    Location:
    SE GA
    Not that isnt anything wrong with your M&P but Glocks some of the hardest priimer strikes in the industry maybe only eclipsed by factory Browning Hi Powers. Bad batches of primers are not unheard of and WWB ammo of all calibers is suspect at the best of times. If you have the same problems with American Eagle or Blazer Brass then your gun is probably fubar and it needs to be repaired. If not, then there could be a plethora (sp) of problems involved in the handloading process that may need to be tweaked.
     
  8. sammy

    sammy Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2007
    Messages:
    214
    Location:
    Concord, CA
    rbernie has an excellent point. What is the measurement on your crimp? The FTE's I can't help you with but look at the ejector (loose?) and the extractor (chipped, spring tention?). I hate unreliable guns and am currently struggling with my G20 :banghead:. Best of luck sorting out the problems, Sammy
     
  9. shooter1

    shooter1 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2004
    Messages:
    1,048
    Location:
    In the shadows.
    Assuming your dies were made in the last couple of decades, they are taper crimp dies. It would be-------- possible------- to slightly over crimp, but doubtful enough to cause head space problems. The light strike problem is likely caused by:
    Excessive oil and gunk in the striker channel, or high primers. The failures to extract are likely caused by a damaged extractor, or gunk/debris in the extractor channel. Occasional, complete disassembly and cleaning of the upper on striker fired pistol is essential to reliable function. Good luck!
    str1
     
  10. tydephan

    tydephan Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2006
    Messages:
    2,142
    Location:
    Huntsville, AL
    On the failed rounds out of today's session, the case mouth (crimp) measures at .420 - .422. COL varies (out of 8 rounds) from 1.125 - 1.128.

    And dies are recently purchased RCBS dies, using a Dillon 550 press. This RCBS die seats and crimps on the same stage.

    I thoroughly cleaned the gun last night, but in the light today when I stripped it in the field, there may be some gunk in the striker channel. I'm about to take it apart again and see if I can clean some of that gunk out a little.

    I didn't shoot the 9mm today. I'm going to try to get the 40 straightened out first.

    Out of today's session, I carried 50 handloads. Out of the first 20 rounds attempted through the M&P40, I had 9 FTF. All had strikes on the primer.

    I loaded up 15 rounds of the same handloads and touched them all off without fail through the Glock 22. Alternatively, I fired 15 rounds of UMC factory ammo through the M&P40 without fail.

    I'm beginning to think the combination of a "lighter" strike from the M&P and some seriously hard primer cups on the Remington 5 1/2 primers is the culprit. But like I said, I'm not dismissing gumming in the striker channel as a possible issue just yet.
     
  11. tydephan

    tydephan Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2006
    Messages:
    2,142
    Location:
    Huntsville, AL
    Well, I cleaned the gunk out of the striker channel and ran to the back of the farm to test.

    13 rounds. 3 fails to fire. All 3 have a solid strike on the primer, albeit a little off center.
     
  12. tincanhunter

    tincanhunter Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2009
    Messages:
    104
    Location:
    roanoke, va
    On a different note, be careful with Titegroup in your 40. I loaded a test set using 155gr RN bullets and the minimum powder charge 5.8gr. Fired 1 round and found a nice flattened primer with machine marks in it. Needless to say the rest went home and were disassembled. Just something to keep an eye out for.
     
  13. David E

    David E Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2008
    Messages:
    7,455
    Well, you're finding out what it isn't...

    How does it do with factory ammo ?
     
  14. tydephan

    tydephan Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2006
    Messages:
    2,142
    Location:
    Huntsville, AL
    Runs like a champ on everything I've fed it. Multiple range sessions. I'd estimate between 1000 and 1200 rounds through it. Never a hiccup.

    Will do. Thanks for the warning. I've been watching for any signs of overpressure.
     
  15. shooter1

    shooter1 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2004
    Messages:
    1,048
    Location:
    In the shadows.
    On the off center strikes that failed to fire, were the strikes in the 6 O Clock? If so, your pistol is not in full battery when the striker falls. How many rounds does the recoil spring have on it since it was new?
    str1
    edit: If you can, I would suggest crimping as a separate operation from bullet seating. The Lee Factory Crimp Die is my choice. It can solve a lot of problems. Perhaps even the one with the M&P .40. Good Luck!
     
    Last edited: Jul 20, 2009
  16. tydephan

    tydephan Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2006
    Messages:
    2,142
    Location:
    Huntsville, AL
    Shooter1,

    Recoil spring has less than 2000 rounds on it. Probably ~1500. As far as the location of the strikes, it's hard to tell as I hand-cycled the round out. So I'm not sure of its original orientation in the chamber, if that makes sense.

    I spoke with Smith this morning. They are dropping a new striker assembly in the mail to see if that fixes the issue with the M&P40. The news isn't so great about the M&P9. It's making a trip back to the mothership for the FTE issues.
     
  17. shooter1

    shooter1 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2004
    Messages:
    1,048
    Location:
    In the shadows.
    tydephan,
    Great! Hope the striker assembly fixes your MP! I don't own one, but I am curious to know if the striker spring is replaceable or it has to be replaced as a unit.
    str1
     
  18. HoosierQ

    HoosierQ Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2008
    Messages:
    2,568
    Location:
    Central Indiana.
    Shot approximately 2500 rounds through 2 M&Ps, all factory WWB, Speer Gold Dot, and Federal 147 Hydrashoks. Never a a failure to Feed, Fire, Extract, or Eject.

    The fact that so much of your trouble was on the handloads has got to be suspicious.

    I had a part break on my M&P 45 so I sent it back, all expenses paid. Sent it out on Feb 3, got it back on Feb 9...100% ready to go. So if it does turn out to be a gun problem, S&W will fix it. (They tossed in a free mag too).

    Good luck.
     
  19. tydephan

    tydephan Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2006
    Messages:
    2,142
    Location:
    Huntsville, AL
    I made it a point to tell Smith about the handloads and how I've never had a single issue with factory rounds through the M&P40. I wanted to make it very clear, IMO, that the gun was not "broke." However, I was having an issue, and I believe that issue to be a harder than usual primer cup in the Rem 5 1/2 primers I'm using for my handloads. Not Smith's fault at all! But if they can help me fix it... :D Know what I mean?

    So if a new and improved striker assembly will fix the issue, then I'll be tickled pink. As I've collected about 3000 Rem 5 1/2 primers and that is all I currently have to load, I'd prefer, at this point, to fix the gun if I can. Afterall, the Glock 22 shoots the same handloads without fail. IMO, a slightly harder than normal primer cup shouldn't result in as many FTF as I'm experiencing.

    As for the M&P9, well, it may have deeper issues. I've used Smith's customer service before with an M&P9c and it was extraordinary. I expect no less with this experience.

    Shooter1,
    I pulled the assembly apart last night to clean it thoroughly. I can just replace the spring, but they are sending me an entire striker assembly. :D
     
  20. shooter1

    shooter1 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2004
    Messages:
    1,048
    Location:
    In the shadows.
    tydephan,
    Sure might as well replace the entire assembly. Hope it fixes the problem!
    str1
     
  21. kmbrman

    kmbrman Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2008
    Messages:
    217
    tydephan
    I've noticed that on my M&P9mm ,the striker channel needs to be cleaned often, not so much after shooting Amer. made ammo, but after shooting the import stuff. Gun always doesn't give any trouble untill I shoot some of the Eastern Bloc stuff. Seems to dirty up fast and then I get weak primer hits. Just wanted to let you know it's happened to others of us shooting the cheap ammo sometimes! My Glock22 never had trouble with this ammo ,but the M&P seems more prone.
     
  22. tydephan

    tydephan Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2006
    Messages:
    2,142
    Location:
    Huntsville, AL
    Thanks a bunch kmbrman. The striker channel was a lot dirtier than I expected it to be. When I saw how dirty it was, I thought for sure I had found the issue.
     
  23. rbernie
    • Contributing Member

    rbernie Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2004
    Messages:
    20,657
    Location:
    Norra Texas
    For two years or so, I shot my M&P9 range mule a lot. Like 200 rounds a week. All handloads. All 125gr cast lead RN boolits, using 4gr of Unique behind 'em.

    The lube goo and powder fouling buildup that would accumulate on that pistol was extrordinary.

    I would normally clean that pistol about, oh, every SIX MONTHS.

    During this same time, I carried a (clean/shiny) M&P every day. My treatment of the range mule was part laziness and partly to see how the platform would stand up to filth and hard use. It literally never once blinked, through thousands and thousands of these functional-but-filthy handloads.

    My point is that these things can take a lot of abuse and dirty conditions. My bet is not on a dirty gun. Either the loads are suspect or the gun's mechanical integrity is suspect.
     
  24. shooter1

    shooter1 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2004
    Messages:
    1,048
    Location:
    In the shadows.
    If the new striker assembly doesn't fix it, it's gotta be an ammo issue. Either OAL or crimp problem.
    str1
     
  25. RH45

    RH45 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2004
    Messages:
    297
    Location:
    Wisconsin
    Do you measure the length of your brass before you load it?

    Even though rifle brass gets longer when it's shot, for some reason, handgun brass seems to get shorter.

    I've never tried Remington primers in my M&Ps, just Winchester and Federal.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page