tydephan
Member
So I loaded up my M&P9, M&P40, and AR and headed to my range this afternoon.
With me, I took some new 223 reloads for my AR, some factory WWB 9mm, and some new 40S&W handloads.
What followed was one of the most frustrating range sessions I've had in recent memory.
Let's talk about the M&P40 first.
I was using some handloaded rounds:
180gr FN bullets
Winchester Nickel Brass
Remington 5 1/2 primers
4.2gr of Hodgdon Titegroup
COL - 1.125
Out of 50 rounds, I experienced 14 failures to fire. All rounds appeared to have a decent strike on the primer. Primers were not seated too deep.
After the first 5 FTF, I rechambered those rounds and attempted to fire them again. Only one fired on the second chance.
In contrast, my father fired a box of the same loads from the same loading session out of his Glock 22 and all fired just fine. He also chambered and fired the remaining 9 rounds my M&P originally failed to fire.
So, I don't know what is wrong.
Then, my frustration was compounded with the M&P9, which jammed 3 times on 4 mags of rapid fire with WWB ball ammo. All failures were a total failure to eject. As in, the round was still suck in the chamber.
Both weapons were clean to begin with.
So my confidence in my M&Ps have been shaken dramatically. I guess I will call Smith Monday morning and talk to them. The M&P40 is one of the first models on the market. Its just now getting broke in good. The M&P9 is one of the earlier models as well.
This sucks.
With me, I took some new 223 reloads for my AR, some factory WWB 9mm, and some new 40S&W handloads.
What followed was one of the most frustrating range sessions I've had in recent memory.
Let's talk about the M&P40 first.
I was using some handloaded rounds:
180gr FN bullets
Winchester Nickel Brass
Remington 5 1/2 primers
4.2gr of Hodgdon Titegroup
COL - 1.125
Out of 50 rounds, I experienced 14 failures to fire. All rounds appeared to have a decent strike on the primer. Primers were not seated too deep.
After the first 5 FTF, I rechambered those rounds and attempted to fire them again. Only one fired on the second chance.
In contrast, my father fired a box of the same loads from the same loading session out of his Glock 22 and all fired just fine. He also chambered and fired the remaining 9 rounds my M&P originally failed to fire.
So, I don't know what is wrong.
Then, my frustration was compounded with the M&P9, which jammed 3 times on 4 mags of rapid fire with WWB ball ammo. All failures were a total failure to eject. As in, the round was still suck in the chamber.
Both weapons were clean to begin with.
So my confidence in my M&Ps have been shaken dramatically. I guess I will call Smith Monday morning and talk to them. The M&P40 is one of the first models on the market. Its just now getting broke in good. The M&P9 is one of the earlier models as well.
This sucks.