I'm no expert but I have an opinion on the matter
First lets look at what they are.
Progressive/Variable springs are engineered to have a variable increase in power as they are compressed. Say we have 2 springs, one variable and one static with the same compressed weight. At some point below full compression the progressive/variable spring will be at a lower tension.
Ideally, to minimize battering I would think you would want a spring engineered so that it has higher spring tension at the back of the stroke, through stripping the round and starting to feed it to the chamber, then have it drop off sharply to lessen the impact of the slide locking up.
How the springs are ACTUALLY engineered (if they are engineered at all) I'm not certain but the ones I've seen appear to be an even progression. Where the tension per unit length increases as the spring compresses. So, the deceleration and re-acceleration occurs more at the back of the slide stroke. This gives lots of power for stripping off a round but also means the round may have less time to feed requiring a stronger magazine spring. Plus you may get a "snappier" recoil as more deceleration is done over less time.
Depending on what compression the springs are tested at for weight it may require a heavier progressive spring to provide the same dampening as a linier rate spring.
When I upgraded my Delta Elite, I went with a standard 20 lbs Wolff spring with a conventional guide rod and took other steps for increasing dwell time on the lock-up.
Don't know if this helps or is even accurate. Let's see if I'm praised or get ripped apart by those who know