Future of Firearms?

Status
Not open for further replies.

cornman

member
Joined
Dec 8, 2007
Messages
472
Is anyone up on the future of firearm technology? It seems to me that there must be something better that the old firecracker in a pipe system we have had for hundreds of years. Besides I would love it if the made something quieter. Heck I would rather fight off an intruder with a bat than have to fire a handgun indoors in the middle of the night.
 
Until the point when military lasers become high-power and small enough for the average soldier, I think we're still going to be using a firecracker with a metal pointy thing at one end for some time.

Now the components of said cartridge may change. You've probably heard of caseless ammo; instead of using a brass shell, the primary and shell are partially encased in a moldable explosive charge. It loads like a bullet and fires like a bullet, but once the bullet leaves there's nothing to extract and eject. They're being considered for aerial and crewed weapons; imagine loading a tank shall and not having to get rid of the old casing. An F-16 wouldn't have to carry it's brass back to base (no, they don't dump; collateral damage), saving fuel. Only problem with all this is that the "casing" is more delicate than a brass shell so the guns and loaders have to be very gentle with the shells right up until pin strikes primer. And of course, you invent a whole new way of making a casing which has not significantly changed in over a century, and it's going to have some steel initial production costs.

There are also rail guns; they have improved the technology to the point where a magnetic slingshot the size of a destroyer gun can throw a shell as far or farther than a gunpowder weapon, and here's the bonus; no gunpowder to squib or cook off. All you need is a hardened steel slug. That will definitely make ship deaths like that of the Hood truly a thing of the past.

Lastly, yes, they are developing lasers and microwaves as tactical weapons. A laser trained on a drone F-16 brought it down in about five seconds, and they're working on upping the wattage. A special microwave emitter can be mounted on a Humvee and used for crowd control to drive back approaching forces, and it isn't harmful for several seconds, while a jolt of less than a second gets you going in a hurry.

All of this can conceivably be miniaturized into something a soldier could carry similar to a SAW or M60. It will however take time; current caseless rifle systems are already there, but the round is too powerful for the average soldier to control, and too expensive for GIs to spend millions of rounds a week.
 
Hillary looks in her crystal ball...... and sees the future citizens armed with nothing.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top