Gas Station Employee Fired for Fighting Off Robber

Status
Not open for further replies.

Eightball

Member
Joined
May 31, 2005
Messages
4,257
Location
Louisville, KY
The bolding is mine. Nothing specifically about firearms, but the bolded parts seem somewhat relevant--LEOs and companies don't want people to even resist robbery anymore, apparently. (Sorry if wrong forum, if so, please move, mods).
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,356710,00.html
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
An act of bravery to defend a co-worker has cost a Minnesota gas-station attendant his job.

Mark Beverly, an overnight shift supervisor at a SuperAmerica in Roseville, Minn., was fired in March after he jumped on a masked robber who he believed was attacking a fellow employee.

SuperAmerica said he violated company policy when he came to his colleague's aid in the early morning of March 26. So instead of accolades, Beverly got the boot.

Adding insult to injury, Beverly — who is still looking for another job — has been denied unemployment benefits. He will appeal that decision on June 5.

The trouble began around 3 a.m. when Beverly was cleaning the bathroom and his female co-worker was behind the cash register. Beverly said he heard her scream, so he ran out and saw a robber wearing a blue-stocking cap jostling with her.

"It looked like he was hurting her, so I jumped on him," Beverly said. "I just tried to bang him on the counter a couple of times."

After a tussle, he said, the robber regained his footing and looked as if he was going to pull out a weapon. Beverly said the man told him, "Don't be a hero," before fleeing the store with about $15.

Beverly called police and reviewed security tapes with his managers before completing his shift. "Everything was fine," he said.

The next day, however, he was fired for violating company policy.

Marathon Petroleum Company, the owner of the SuperAmerica chain, said Beverly was told what to do in the company handbook — which advises employees to "cooperate: don't argue, resist or attack the robber" — and through a computer-based training program Beverly was required to complete when he was hired.

"He endangered himself and her, and that’s why we have the policy," said Linda Casey, a Marathon spokeswoman. "And we have enforced it with other employees, not just with him."

"I just thought it was wrong, that's all," said Beverly, who had worked at SuperAmerica for just over a year. "You're not really trained for a robbery, and that was the first robbery I have ever been in in my life."

Capt. Rick Mathwig of the Roseville Police Department said authorities advise people not to take action when faced with a robbery.

"When you start resisting at some way shape or form, the suspect who may not have intended on using the weapon that he or she came with may use it intentionally or unintentionally when faced with a conflict," he said.


Roseville police have listed the case as inactive as they have not been able to identify the robber. The only image of him is partial profile and his face is obscured by the stocking cap, Mathwig said.

The security tape did not show the female co-worker struggling with the robber over the cash-register drawer, Casey said.

"The female employee was never attacked," she said. The robber reached in and grabbed cash out of the drawer.

"We have a statement from both [Beverly] and the female employee," Casey said. "Neither one of them say anything about her being attacked, hurt or anything, and the video we have substantiates it."

Beverly said that from his vantage point, he thought she was being attacked.

"With both of them so close it looked — from the angle that I was at — it looked like she was being attacked," he said.
 
And if he would have done nothing and the female employee had been attacked what would have happened? He probably would have been fired or sued by someone for doing nothing.
 
Here's his chance at a new job better than cleaning toilets at 3am.
Somebody with a brain and a business is going to see this in the area press and offer him a real job. Then everybody in this story gets the happy ending, including even the SuperA-holes and the guy with $15.
 
rule book!

To stop trouble like this in the future the employees should put the money in a bag on the floor in front of the cash register during the shift and that way anyone can just come in a take it as they wish!
 
I wonder if that criminal has a cause of action against Marathon Oil Company because he had a right to expect that no one would oppose him with deadly force at that station. It probably caused him great distress, and rightfully so.
 
Here's his chance at a new job better than cleaning toilets at 3am.
Somebody with a brain and a business is going to see this in the area press and offer him a real job. Then everybody in this story gets the happy ending, including even the SuperA-holes and the guy with $15.

really wished it worked that way but my money is on it not having such a positive outcome. Certainly hope it does though.
 
So some one should be allowed to to break company policy and not expect to be fired becuase of it?

That is after all what you are saying.
 
TAB- not refering to me are you? If it is company policy, so be it. He did the right thing and doesn't need to be in a place like that. I don't believe there will be people lining up to hire him though
 
This is silly. But, we can blame our fellow citizens for it, not the courts, lawyers, etc. The company in this instance is pretty much caught in a no-win situation because of foolish lawsuits and awards given by misled and foolish juries.

As alluded to above, the perp could get hurt, sue and win a lot. Or the employees could get hurt, sue and win a lot. Or a randon customer could walk in, get hurt in the fracus, sue and win a lot. Lawyers have determined that the company is better off if the threatened employees just roll into a fetal ball and plead, "Please don't hurt me!" The perps know that.

Nothing will change so long as we, the people, continue to give silly verdicts in court and award silly rewards for silly acts.
 
No good deed goes unpunished!

I am hoping someone offers this great acting individual a better job, or at least better employers than he already had.
 
No good deed goes unpunished!

I am hoping someone offers this great acting individual a better job, or at least better employers than he already had.

So you would hire some one that was fired from his last job do to gross insaboradanation?
 
So you would hire some one that was fired from his last job do to gross insaboradanation?

In this case, yes. Sounds like preservation for the life of a human being overrode insubordination...

I am okay with that.
 
So you would hire some one that was fired from his last job do to gross insaboradanation?

Just as quickly as I would hire someone with that atrocious grammar and spelling.
 
In this case, yes. Sounds like preservation for the life of a human being overrode insubordination..

what if it had been some kid with a water pistol and he killed the kid. Would you still hire that person? he was defending his life( atleast in his mind) if not, explain to me how thats diffrent.

Also if you were intrested in hiring this guy and you called that employer, chances are all you would not get the story as to why he was fired, you would simply get "gross insaboradanation" as the cuase for termanation.
 
what if it had been some kid with a water pistol and he killed the kid. Would you still hire that person? he was defending his life( atleast in his mind) if not, explain to me how thats diffrent.

Wow.. really?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top