Gathering opinions on what to do with this Belguim made Hi-Power...

Status
Not open for further replies.
Well yeah, his reasons for buying aren't the most common. I understand the reasoning behind his collection though. I'm not understanding the rationale from whoever initially made the decision to keep the aforementioned BHP that the OP acquired in unfired condition.

I understand keeping it "unfired with box" like I said. I understand keeping it "lightly used with box" or "LNIB"...but not "Unfired-no box".

To have not fired it 36 years ago based on potential future value, but not keep it in it's original, as-new condition (box, paperwork, etc...) is where it doesn't make sense to me.

People in any collecting realm have known for years that original packaging, price tags, window stickers, build sheets, sales receipts, etc enhance value.
Just seems to me that the folks I know that are so picky about retaining "mint" condition guns are also meticulous about everything else regarding said guns.

Bought thought they would shoot it did not. Not a collector by nature so they pitched the box. Died and it was sold at auction. Also could the heirs might not have been gun people and had the box but did not realize it added value.
 
Let me tell the sad tale of my Dad and his Hi Power.

He bought a new one in the late 50’s. Kept it in the original box, un-fired, thinking it would be “worth something one day”. As a kid I always admired it whenever he would take it out and let me fondle it.

Fast forward 30 years later to the mid 80’s. Our house was broken into, it was stolen and became someone else’s possession, admired or otherwise. Naturally, he regretted never getting any value from it, let alone never shooting it.

Fast forward again another 30 years or so and an opportunity came up for me to acquire my first Hi Power.

https://www.thehighroad.org/index.php?threads/got-my-first-hi-power.829068/

The history of my dad’s experience made an impression on me and I knew I’d eventually own a Hi Power. I also knew that when I did get one I’d take my dad to the range and let him shoot it. I’m happy to say that we were able to do that. Whether shooting my Hi Power made up for what happened to his is hard to say. I don’t think he stewed over it.

With that said, my dad passed last June so if it mattered, even a little, it was worth it to me.

The moral of this story - life is too short to let guns sit in safes un-fired
 
Yeah, I understand that. I guess my confusion is in the context of retaining a pistol in unfired condition, yet ditching the box. Even 35+ years ago, people would have understood the significance of "unfired in the box".
I have a buddy that has a handful of unfired BHP's, but I hadn't gawked at them in a few years. They're in his safe amongst a pile of unfired Colt 1911's and revolvers. I just remember boxes stacked on boxes (they're all in boxes)...but lots of white boxes. He's not a shooter, so his collection is almost entirely unfired stuff with a few customs mixed in. His view is entirely through the lense of financial investment.

Your confusion is not lost on me - I wondered this same thing. Who does this - keeps this beauty, seemingly unfired, but doesn't keep the box?? I have always kept boxes for almost everything! In my experience of not only collecting firearms but many other 'things' (again much to my wife's delight :rofl:) items with original boxes DO bring a premium for sure.

**Thought it would be a mystery on the box but -- I called the auctioneer yesterday (I've done lots of business with him over the years) to see if he could provide some insight on this and he did! -- turns out he knows the consignee personally and he gave her a call to ask and she explained -- Here's the gist of it, the estate from which this gun came from was a guy whom for 30+ years liked to just randomly buy firearms (mostly pistols) and other stuff but he never fired them. He was a bit of a pack rat and 'collected' all sorts of things. He passed away unexpectedly several years ago. He always bought them new (modern pieces I assume) usually with box his wife said. In-fact, she explained that he had run out of space in the two safes he had and taken a lot of the pistols out of the boxes to make room. He was holding on to the boxes though, storing them in his basement. However, it must have been quite damp in the basement and she said that a lot of the cardboard type boxes had eventually over the years started to get mold on them and rot a bit. The auctioneer said that another auctioneer had already purchased the entire collection of firearms some years ago and took most of the boxes that were plastic and hadn't molded or were able to be salvaged. Then she threw the rest away thinking who would want the boxes that she felt were ruined anyway and she also didn't realize that there were still a few pistols left. Fast forward some years later she contacted the auctioneer that I won the gun from to see if he was interested in the rest of this guys 'stuff'. She found the BHP and a few other guns that had been missed years ago when she sold what she thought was the entire collection. Hence the reason this auctioneer had them as like I said earlier, this auctioneer usually doesn't sell guns but decided to take them and list them anyway.
The wife of this man also explained that her husband really didn't know much about any of the guns he had and neither did she. She wasn't even sure why he kept wanting to buy them. In fact, she said he never used them and there wasn't one round of ammunition to be found in the whole house!?!? Which IMO is just nuts! Now, there's no telling for sure whether or not this BHP's box was one of the ruined ones or not but it would be a good calculated guess, IMO, that it likely was. VERY interesting and I'm glad I made that call. Thought it would be fruitless but it wasn't.

Bought thought they would shoot it did not. Not a collector by nature so they pitched the box. Died and it was sold at auction. Also could the heirs might not have been gun people and had the box but did not realize it added value.

You were on to something here @WVsig - except for the bit about pitching the boxes...he was saving them but they had been ruined some years back. But basically your above quote is right. He, nor his heirs, knew anything about the guns or about collecting them or anything else.
 
Let me tell the sad tale of my Dad and his Hi Power.

He bought a new one in the late 50’s. Kept it in the original box, un-fired, thinking it would be “worth something one day”. As a kid I always admired it whenever he would take it out and let me fondle it.

Fast forward 30 years later to the mid 80’s. Our house was broken into, it was stolen and became someone else’s possession, admired or otherwise. Naturally, he regretted never getting any value from it, let alone never shooting it.

Fast forward again another 30 years or so and an opportunity came up for me to acquire my first Hi Power.

https://www.thehighroad.org/index.php?threads/got-my-first-hi-power.829068/

The history of my dad’s experience made an impression on me and I knew I’d eventually own a Hi Power. I also knew that when I did get one I’d take my dad to the range and let him shoot it. I’m happy to say that we were able to do that. Whether shooting my Hi Power made up for what happened to his is hard to say. I don’t think he stewed over it.

With that said, my dad passed last June so if it mattered, even a little, it was worth it to me.

The moral of this story - life is too short to let guns sit in safes un-fired

@Nature Boy I'm sorry about your dad..you have a very valid point. We do not know the day/time and only the good Lord does. What a horrible feeling it must have been when it was stolen from him? Can't imagine.
 
Last edited:
While maybe not in the same league as Lugers or Colt Peacemakers, it does have decent collector value. The golden rule of collecting ( well, ONE of them) is this: Each percentage point over 97% can significantly increase the value of the piece. If I run a single mag through the gun, enough to wear off 1% of the finish, I have just lost a lot of value. Not gonna happen.

I find this to be true and the very reason that once I had this BHP in my hands I was suddenly questioning what to do with it. I AM a shooter and for the most part pieces I buy, I like to shoot. However, the golden rule you mentioned comes into play here I think.
 
I find this to be true and the very reason that once I had this BHP in my hands I was suddenly questioning what to do with it. I AM a shooter and for the most part pieces I buy, I like to shoot. However, the golden rule you mentioned comes into play here I think.
We are in a similar position, my friend. Until last month I had never even fired a Hi-Power. I got to shoot one at my place and it was truly a sweet experience. It was a newer model with the decent safety and sights. I fell in love with that gun.

Your gun looks pretty much like mine. The C-96 is also unfired after leaving the factory. It was examined by Mr. Simpson at Simpson's Collector guns and that was his opinion. But still just an opinion. I can't prove it. The entire inside of the gun is gooped in cosmoline. It will never be fired either.
 

Attachments

  • CGVH2768[1].JPG
    CGVH2768[1].JPG
    135.1 KB · Views: 17
  • IMG_7956[1].JPG
    IMG_7956[1].JPG
    139.7 KB · Views: 19
Last edited:
We are in a similar position, my friend. Until last month I had never even fired a Hi-Power. I got to shoot one at my place and it was truly a sweet experience. It was a newer model with the decent safety and sights. I fell in love with that gun.

Your gun looks pretty much like mine. The C-96 is also unfired after leaving the factory. It was examined by Mr. Simpson as Simpson's Collector guns and that was his opinion. The entire inside of the gun is gooped in cosmoline. It will never be fired either.

tark - we certainly are in a similar situation. Until about 6 weeks back when I bought this one I had never owned or shot a BHP. I have always heard what a pleasure they are to shoot and that's one of the reasons that prompted me to bid on this one when I saw it. I've also been eyeing them up for a good while because of the Browning design and how it was similar to his 1911 design so it fits in to my main collection :) So, now I own one but still haven't shot one...LOL

P.S.
A couple of nice pieces you got there!
 
Really, if you can sell it for a profit, sell it. If you shoot it, knock $300 off it’s value.

If it winds up with a little rust sitting on your safe, knock $300 off it’s value.

If you WANT a nice High Power to shoot, shoot it and keep it.

I have too many safe queens now. I’ve sold a bunch. Will sell more.

I’m tired of being controlled by my possessions. Sentimental guns and good users get to stay.

But, I’ve owned at least one of every gun I’ve ever really wanted or needed.
 
tark - we certainly are in a similar situation. Until about 6 weeks back when I bought this one I had never owned or shot a BHP. I have always heard what a pleasure they are to shoot and that's one of the reasons that prompted me to bid on this one when I saw it. I've also been eyeing them up for a good while because of the Browning design and how it was similar to his 1911 design so it fits in to my main collection :) So, now I own one but still haven't shot one...LOL

P.S.
A couple of nice pieces you got there!

It is not really a Browning design…. :eek:
 
Please school me! From what I understand - in a nutshell - he basically designed it but after he died, FN finished. No?
.

Look at my avatar. That is the last pistol JMB designed and patented. It is not the pistol we shoot today.

It is too late in the evening to go into detail. I will explain my interpretation tomorrow.
 
Look at my avatar. That is the last pistol JMB designed and patented. It is not the pistol we shoot today.

It is too late in the evening to go into detail. I will explain my interpretation tomorrow.
Yes, I get that...but if he doesn't design it to that first, FN would have likely not made the gun as we know it now, I think. Ill look forward to your post tomorrow. :)
 
Yes, I get that...but if he doesn't design it to that first, FN would have likely not made the gun as we know it now, I think. Ill look forward to your post tomorrow. :)

Here is my take in it. A lot of credit goes to Anthony Vanderlinden, R Blake Stevens, Burgs, Stephen Camp and Submoa. A lot of this info is my modified version of information that Submoa posted many years ago on another forum. He no longer posts much anywhere but knows more about the BHP than anyone I have ever interacted with. He makes me look like a Kindergartener and I am told his collection is one of kind. This is a pic of the last Patent JMB ever filed. It is the 1922 design of the Grande Rendement prior. The patent was filed for on June 23,1923. This was prior to FN/Saive later modifications.

sweCubR.jpg

The only features of JMB's original locked breech design of 1922 that are still part of the pistol we shoot today are the barrel lock-up, the multi-articulated trigger and the “High Capacity” magazine. JMB did not design the magazine. Dieudonné Joseph Saive designed/prototyped at the request of FN because JMB refused to because he thought capacity over 7 or 8 rounds was unnecessary. The foundation of the pistol the staggered column/single feed “High Capacity” magazine was designed by Saive and then used by JMB in the 1922 design.

JMB's original 1922 locked breech prototype was delivered to FN by JMB's son along with a near identical blowback prototype which FN immediately dismissed. The remaining pistol was a large/heavy, hammerless/striker fired, cylindrical interrupted screw-modular/removable breech bolt design in which the slide reciprocated within the frame similar to the CZ75. It had a sliding safety catch situated at the rear face of the slide and no external slide lock. It lacked the signature “BHP cut” at the front of the slide.

With Val’s input, FN immediately modified the JMB 1922 locked breech design and produced a pair of tool room pistols to be used for the French Military Trials of 1922. The FN tool room design drawings for this 1922 FN improved JMB pistol became the US Patent drawings JMB submitted in 1923. Immediately following the "promising" initial 1922 French Trials…in which Val assisted FN’s Captain Chevalier, FN undertook major design modifications in an effort to satisfy the everchanging modifications of the French Trials. The gun evolved over this time. It got smaller & lighter. A hammer was added to satisfy the French. IIRC this is one of the 2 prototypes which is on diplay at the Browning Museum in Utah.

bE88Kyy.jpg

Still it retained the complicated cylindrical interrupted screw-modular/removable breech bolt design. The slide still reciprocated within the frame and still used a sliding safety catch situated at the rear face of the slide remained. There was no external slide lock. Was referred by a new name the "Grand Rendement” but for all intents and purposes is was an FN improved JMB 1922 design. JMB was not doing the design work on these changes. Saive and the rest of the FN designers did this work. This is an important point. IMHO The French Trials pretty much went nowhere fast. FN had put time money and effort into satisfying them but still had no contract to show for it. FN instructed Dieudonné Joseph Saive to design a 9mm pistol intended for the wider Military market. They were smart to give up on the French Contract because they did not win it in the end.

JMB died in 1926 while at his desk in Liege. Some people incorrectly state that he died working on the BHP. He did not. He was working on an elegant Superpose Shotgun design. Over a year after JMB’s 1926 death Saive took elements of JMB's 1922 design along with the many subsequent FN/Saive improvements, finally adding elements of JMB's 1911 design after those patents expired. Saive in some ways started with relatively clean slate which producted the Saive/Browning 1928” design. Some people claim that Saive and FN were waiting for the 1911 Patents to expire before continuing development but I have found no proof of that. The fits and starts of the French Contract were more the driver of the timing then the 1911 patents. IMHO

This is the actual direct ancestor of the BHP we know today. This was the first design that mimics the gun we shoot today. Saive’s 1928 pistol looks and feels like the gun we know as the BHP. It is mechanically similar in a practical sense and in its size, contour, profile, operation. Again, look closely at the Grand Rendement of 1927 v. the Saive/Browning of 1928...then compare the Saive/Browning of 1928 with the what we call the BHP. Everything that makes the Browning High Power what it is today was Saive’s design improvements. All that is left of the JMB design are the barrel lock-up, the multi-articulated trigger and the “High Capacity” magazine. Remember he did not design the magazine. As Meatloaf used to sing “2 out of 3 ain’t bad…..”

So if JMB did not design the pistol we shoot today why did FN name the 1934/35 production design the “Browning 9mm High Power Automatic Pistol”. They even advertised as a JMB design by rollmarking the pistols “Browning’s Patent Depose”. I believe that the reason for doing this was twofold.

First JMB’s name on a pistol was considered Gold. Each of his pistols designs at the time were considered huge leaps forward. They were great sellers to militarys all over the world which is where FN made its money and still does today. Many considered the name Browning to be synonyms with = “Automatic pistol”. A Browning design was a guaranteed seller.

The Second reason is that FN adored JMB. They referred to him as “Le Maître” – “The Master”. He was in some ways FN savior. The Browning 1899 pistol which became the 1900 was a huge success for FN. The designs that followed kept FN on top in the European market. The 1903/1905/1910 and 1910/22 all sold well. That does not even take into account the shotguns he designed for them.

Not only did FN professionally and personally revered JMB but there was also the practical matter that FN had to honored the business agreements with Browning, FN and Colt. These 3 had a long-standing agreement to divide and control the JMB pistol market around the world.

Now do not get me wrong. I like many other worship at the feet of JMB. The 1911 is still the world’s finest combat handgun and the king of feedway stoppages…. LOL I however believe that in our blinds worship for the greatest firearms designer ever we short the real designer of the BHP. Dieudonné Joseph Saive In many of the fluff pieces people write about the development of the BHP they refer to Saive as JMBs assistant when in fact Saive was FN’s lead designer. JMB was not even a FN employee but rather a contract employee who was paid via royalties not by salary. I believe we should give credit where credit is due.

This IMHO is a more accurate telling of the history of the BHP than most people tell. I am sure that others will disagree. They always do when I post this info. I am interested in what Anthony Vanderlinden adds to the narrative in his newest 3rd Edition of FN Browning Pistols, Side Arms That Shaped the World which is due to be published later this year.
 
It most certainly is
It most certainly IS NOT! Read WVsig's above post. JMB had very little to do with the gun we know today as the Browning Hi-Power. Read paragraph #8 in the post. That is the only reason JMB's name is associated with the gun.
 
Yinzer-Steve

Many years ago I had a very pristine T Series Browning Hi-Power that was incredibly beautiful on the outside but truly dysfunctional on the inside. Slide to frame fit was rather loose, the trigger was off the charts in terms of measuring how heavy it was, the sights were very difficult to see, and the thumb safety practically required a whack from a plastic mallet to use it. Accuracy with this one was basically Minute of Side of Barn! Since I bought this gun to be a shooter it ended up going down the road. I had no problem selling it to a collector for more money than I paid for it.

Moving right along and still wanting another Hi-Power but this time a bit more user friendly, I came across the Browning Hi-Power Mk.II. Here were all the "improvements" I was looking for: tight slide to frame fit, light and clean trigger pull, easy to see sights, and an ambi thumb safety that was joy to use! I must admit I missed that great Browning bluing and checkered walnut stocks but here was a right out of the box and ready to go Hi-Power that is accurate, reliable, and fun to shoot!
52xA8NW.jpg
 
Last edited:
@WVsig That is some great information. Thank you! I'm certainly not arguing the facts that you have stated. However, even after reading it and based on the info, I still feel like JMB still gets a lot of credit or '1st credit' (is that a thing?) on it as I feel like if he doesn't design it to where he did for FN then FN NEVER has a decent base of design to improve on and we never get to the design we shoot today. Also, some of FN's improvement 'ideas' would certainly look like they were based off of JMB's 1911 design. So, maybe some of those FN changes could also be 'via second hand' attributed to JMB. I'm definitely a 'kindergartner' on the BHP but this is my view even after the info you've provided. Don't get me wrong as I can appreciate that Saive did not get the credit he deserved but it all still comes back to the first design/patent from JMB as if not for it, there is nothing to build on.
 
and the thumb safety practically required a whack from a plastic mallet to use it.

I must admit I missed that great Browning bluing and checkered walnut stocks but here was a right out of the box and ready to go Hi-Power that is accurate, reliable, and fun to shoot!
I will say the thumb safety on this one is similar. Not quite a plastic mallet to use but definitely a strong thumb! The polished blued finish is definitely a better looking finish for sure.
 
@Yinzer-Steve

If you decide you don't want to wear the new off the pistol you have acquired, there's an easy solution. Get another one.

index.php


The forged-framed MkIII on top was my first Hi Power. My second one is a 1943 German occupation GP-35 'High' Power.

Interesting footnote, I bought both of them from members of THR through the classified forum

I shoot them both

index.php
 
You can own more than one copy of the same gun.

You can also own more than two.

nndeYPQ.jpg

Hi Powers are the only firearm that I have more than one of, which makes me a rank amateur compared to other “collectors”. I tell myself that I’m perfectly content with 3 but I know that if another one catches my eye it stands a good chance of becoming number 4
 
@WVsig That is some great information. Thank you! I'm certainly not arguing the facts that you have stated. However, even after reading it and based on the info, I still feel like JMB still gets a lot of credit or '1st credit' (is that a thing?) on it as I feel like if he doesn't design it to where he did for FN then FN NEVER has a decent base of design to improve on and we never get to the design we shoot today. Also, some of FN's improvement 'ideas' would certainly look like they were based off of JMB's 1911 design. So, maybe some of those FN changes could also be 'via second hand' attributed to JMB. I'm definitely a 'kindergartner' on the BHP but this is my view even after the info you've provided. Don't get me wrong as I can appreciate that Saive did not get the credit he deserved but it all still comes back to the first design/patent from JMB as if not for it, there is nothing to build on.

Well if you want to look at it from that perspective it is still Saive's gun. He designed the magazine which JMB took and built around. Wiithout the mag JMB has no foundation for the design. It would might have been radically different without Saive's starting point. I think personally if you look at the fact only sentimentality leads one to the conclusion that the BHP we shoot today was designed by JMB.
 
Always thought this was a poor analogy to apply to any discussion about gun collecting. You can own more than one copy of the same gun.
Instead of polygamy... polygunny! Haha

I agree with ya, and have no problem setting one aside. That's just not how I usually do it
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top