A
alphabeta121
Guest
So I've got friends interested in purchasing handguns for self-defense. They are all coming to front sight's 4 day defensive pistol and possibly the chuck taylor class. My question's are, one tried a glock and a sig, but he liked the sig a little bit more. It was his first time shooting handguns. Why should he get a glock over a sig. (all i know is that safe action is better than double -> single, is that it.)
Another read up on the H&K mark 23 and the Glock 24 and Glock 35. Naish at front sight recommended a glock 22. Why would that be better than any of the above firearms as a defensive pistol. I told him for the cost of a mark 23 he'd be much better of with a les baer thunder ranch 1911. What do you all think?
Another read up on the H&K mark 23 and the Glock 24 and Glock 35. Naish at front sight recommended a glock 22. Why would that be better than any of the above firearms as a defensive pistol. I told him for the cost of a mark 23 he'd be much better of with a les baer thunder ranch 1911. What do you all think?