Glocks with a safety?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Dashunde

Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2003
Messages
109
I've seen a few pictures of Glocks that have had a safety installed, but I can not remember where I saw it or who did the work. Anyone know?

I'm kind of surprized that Glock has not yet offered a few models with a factory safety. It seems reasonable, particularly for their CCW models like the 26 and 27 that are not always carried in a standard trigger-guarded holster. I suspect that more than a few are simply carried in a pocket, which is a bit dicey without a real safety.

I'd be the first in line to grab a G30 if it was available with a lever safety.
 
I'm kind of surprized that Glock has not yet offered a few models with a factory safety.
Actually, all Glocks have three safeties built in from the factory. These safeties are so smart that they automatically engage and disengage right when you want them to!

Talk about a smart gun!
 
Another (and much less costly) solution would be the Saf-T-Blok, a small aluminum block that is designed to be a friction fit behind the trigger, and is simply pushed out from right to left when you want to put the pistol into action. One souce is www.topglock.com/catalog/extras.htm

SAFTBLOK.gif


To answer the other concerns:

Pocket holsters do exist, and for those who carry without one, as long as there is nothing else in the pocket, there is nothing to foul the trigger.
 
Sorry, but I reaaly do not want a trigger block on my CCW. :scrutiny:

This has been discussed before and I think it ended with : How many negligent discharges have occurred from the Glock? Believe me, I was the most skeptical at first. It seems that I should have some mechanical means of safing the firearm. I now have no problems after multiple-mode carries. Relax. :)
 
How odd-

I was just looking at that Cominolli Glock safety... I have a Glock 20 was wondering about having it installed anyone have experience with them? I know it isn't needed but all my other autos are BHP and 1911s so I am used to swiping the safety anyhow. Love to hear from anyone who has had it installed.
BTW Sunray you are 100% right!
Thanks
Mark
 
Thanks for the Cominolli link Sean.

I agree that the best safety is between ones ears, however after growing up with guns and being taught correctly, I still ended up with a hole in my ceiling one night.
I was following ingrained lessons learned early by keeping it pointed in a safe direction no matter what, hence the hole in the ceiling instead of something more important. Regardless...
I had a brain fart... and not a single one of us are beyond or above this type of error, and about the time that you think you are, you will inevitably be reminded - as I was.
 
Pocket holsters do exist, and for those who carry without one, as long as there is nothing else in the pocket, there is nothing to foul the trigger.
Like your hand and fingers--of course, it makes getting a good grip and drawing (particularly in hurry) kind of difficult.
I had a brain fart... and not a single one of us are beyond or above this type of error, and about the time that you think you are, you will inevitably be reminded - as I was.
There are two types of gun people: those who have had an accidental discharge, and those who have not had one YET.

Glocks lend themselves to operator error accidental discharges.
 
What about Glocks with the 3.5 pound trigger? Would you carry a 1911 with a 3.5 pound trigger with the safety off?

Just a thought. A manual safety on a Glock isn't really necessary, but then, it's not neccessary on a 1911 with a grip safety, either, and yet we have them. *shrug*

I think Gaston is probably very disinclined to modify his pistols much. Might be an ego thing, who knows. I think there's probably a market out there for a Glock with a FRAME MOUNTED manual safety, though.
 
jc2,

The same old prattle... and just as unsubstantiated as ever. :uhoh:


Nightcrawler,

The 3.5 pound connector in a Glock does not give a 3.5 pound trigger pull.

I can imagine that among Gaston's reasons are: When you are selling everything you can produce, and you are producting at the limits of your capacity, why would you WANT to make changes/add more complexity to your process?

I wouldn't either.... but perhaps I've been in manufacturing too long. :scrutiny:
 
Glocks lend themselves to operator error accidental discharges.
Why do you say that? Is there some statistic out there that rates the number of NDs per 100,000 guns of a given brand? Is there such a list that will have Glock on top? If that stat exist please share it with us. Otherwise, please don't state personal opinion as fact. It confuses people.
 
For those who do not understand the difference between single and double action the 3.5lb 1911 trigger and the Glock 3.5lb trigger could be the same in their mind.

In the real world the Glock is a DAO and the 1911 is a single action.

A cocked and unlocked 1911 does not have the same trigger pull as a Glock.
 
You or Glock can call it anything you wish.

The ATF and all the police depts and all the competition rules call it a DAO because the trigger pull serves a double action. It pulls the striker to the rear and releases it. Double action.
 
More like "Light double action" would be right, because I belive the firing pin is already cocked back halfway and under some tension. Though I belive not enough to actually ignite a round if droped at that point (not possible with the operator controls.)

It's USE is certinly DAO.

And I have to say it's a pretty darn safe design, if carried like a GUN, and not a water pistol.
 
cornbred2,

Actually...

IDPA notes the distinction between Double Action and Safe Action:

STOCK SERVICE PISTOL division is intended to offer a place in competition for shooters using popular "stock" Double Action/Safe Action factory service pistols such as the Glock, Beretta, S&W, Ruger, Browning and Sig.
 
Doesn't sound like much of a distinction to me--sounds more like semantics.
 
Last edited:
STOCK SERVICE PISTOL division is intended to offer a place in competition for shooters using popular "stock" Double Action/Safe Action factory service pistols such as the Glock, Beretta, S&W, Ruger, Browning and Sig.
OK, then, what is the distinction (other than semantics)? They are lumped together in the same division, aren't they? Sure doesn't sound like much of a distinction, does it?
 
Call the action what you want, DAO or otherwise... But one thing about a Glock is certain, if something gets infront of that trigger and pushes it a bit - its going to fire.

It's not the Glock itself that spooks me, it's the very light and nearly safetyless trigger that bothers me with regard to day to day carry.
A Glock is more like carrying my Para LDA with the safety off, (a big no-no) than it is to a traditional DAO heavy long-travel trigger.
 
Call the action what you want, DAO or otherwise... But one thing about a Glock is certain, if something gets infront of that trigger and pushes it a bit - its going to fire.

ALL my guns manifest this problem too! ;)
 
"There are two types of gun people: those who have had an accidental discharge, and those who have not had one YET."
I agree,carry a ccw or duty weapon long enough and you will have a AD or ND if you prefer. The person who keeps their firearms in the safe and shoots once a month or so,may never have it happen. Think of it like having a auto accident,the more time on the road,the higher chance you take. Bad example,but look at the Waco Raid tapes. The Federal Agent who went up on the roof accidently has a AD and puts a round through his leg. Brand of weapon(looks like Glock 17) was not important,but it happened. Now,this is trained officer who probably spent more time on the range and hogan's alley,then most of us combined. Now,if you obey the "rules" it will probably never happen:D
I think a 1911 style safety is a great idea for Glock. In fact,the 1911 safety is the most natural safety for me for me to put in action in a hurry. I'm surprised that other manufactuers have not already picked up on it. It's a lot easier to put in action then a slide mounted safety. And a plus is,if a bad guy gets your weapon away from you,you have a small insurance policy while you get your back-up into action or take other corrective action. I know that most of us will never have to worry about losing a weapon in the heat of action,but if you do,you have a couple of seconds before the bad guy figures out how to go bang. There is a reason that most police officers are required to make sure their vests will stop their duty weapons they carry. In fact,most police officers are shot with their own duty weapons,that a bad guy gets ahold of during a situation. We lost a officer in my state last year,when a mental case got his weapon out of his holster and shot him in the head at point blank range with his own duty weapon. Another reason L.E carry a quality holster is to reduce a chance of losing their weapon. I guess holster's are my pet peeve. I hate to see someone with a $500 ccw pistol stuffed in their pocket or belt.
I think the 1911 safety is a great idea on a Glock. A good thing just got better!! I have always felt kinda funny with a Glock trigger mounted safety. Reminds me of having the brakes of a car mounted on the gas peddle. Or better yet,no brakes and being told to keep your foot off the gas to prevent accidents. A friend of mine used to carry his 1911 locked and cocked,thumb safety off. His argument was the 1911 had several safety devices and leaving the thumb safety off made it faster to get into action. No one is trying to take anyone's pistol away by adding a extra option for it. ;)
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top