Gonzales Lays Out Broad Priorities

Status
Not open for further replies.

rick_reno

member
Joined
Dec 25, 2002
Messages
3,027
Mention of the BATF expanding into other cities to push the Safe Neighborhoods initiative. I didn't see anything surprising or objectional in his agenda. Crime rates are down, so something they're doing is working.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,148995,00.html

Gonzales Lays Out Broad Priorities

Tuesday, March 01, 2005
WASHINGTON — With less rhetorical flourish, but a broader list of priorities than his predecessor, newly installed Attorney General Alberto Gonzales (search) on Monday put the prosecution of obscenity cases, renewal of the Patriot Act and continuing the drop in crime among the top goals for the Department of Justice.

Delivering a speech at a Washington meeting of the California-based Hoover Institution (search), Gonzales said the threat from Al Qaeda is "still very real" and warned that "complacency becomes our enemy" when fighting terrorism.

Some provisions of the USA Patriot Act, enacted shortly after Sept. 11, 2001, when John Ashcroft was attorney general, are set to expire at the end of the year. Gonzales said he will not support changes to the Patriot Act that would make America more vulnerable to terrorists.

"The Patriot Act is working and I think it is safe to say it's helped prevent additional terrorist acts," Gonzales said.

"I am committed to prosecuting these crimes aggressively," he said, adding that he is instructing DOJ lawyers to "carefully review federal laws" and find out how they can strengthen their ability to prosecute obscenity cases.

In other priorities, Gonzales praised the 30-year low in the crime rate and touted the new Violent Crime Impact Teams, inspired by President Bush's Safe Neighborhoods (search) initiative. The project coordinates federal, state and local law enforcement partners "to drive down the rate of violent crime, crimes committed with guns and trafficking in illegal drugs."

The teams, led by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (search) and including Drug Enforcement Agency agents, marshals, state troopers, country sheriffs, and local and state prosecutors, is currently in 15 cities and is expanding to five more — Camden, N.J.; Fresno, Calif.; Hartford, Conn.; Houston and New Orleans.

Gonzales, the son of Mexican immigrants, also said the immigration judicial system needs work and pointed out that criminal aliens get more hearings and appeals than non-criminal aliens. He also pledged to step up investigations and prosecutions in human trafficking.

"Its victims are usually aliens, many of them women and children who are smuggled into our country and held in bondage," he said. He also urged Congress to complete work on legislation to make the review process a fairer one.

Ending Senate blockage of judicial nominees before a vacancy opens on the Supreme Court is also key to Gonzales. He said that the "broken process" must be fixed ahead of that time, adding that nominees have been denied a vote while a crisis mounts in the judicial system because of a shortage of judges.

Gonzales said appointed judges must respect the Constitution. He added that he would like to see the Constitution amended to give crime victims the right to participate in prosecutions and sentencings.

FOX News' Anna Persky and The Associated Press contributed to this report.


Gonzales also said that people are not guaranteed free speech rights when they are in the business of distributing obscene materials. He defended Justice Department attorneys who were told they went too far in trying to block the sale of pornographic movies over the Internet and through the mail. A federal judge in Pittsburgh dismissed the case but the Justice Department will appeal.
 
Gonzales also said that people are not guaranteed free speech rights when they are in the business of distributing obscene materials.
This I find HIGHLY objectionable. First off, just WHO will determine what is obscene? All of us have different standards. One man's obscenity is another man's ham and egg breakfast. I find no mention in the first amendment of exceptions for obscenity, do you? Consider this as well.
Attorney General nominee Alberto Gonzales (search) told the Senate on Tuesday that he supports extending the expired federal assault weapons ban. Source: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,144793,00.html
and this
Pressed on the issue, Gonzales defended language in which he labeled as "quaint" some of the Geneva Conventions' human rights protections for prisoners of war and said they did not extend to Al Qaeda and other suspected terrorists. Source: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,146428,00.html
This man, indeed the whole Bush administration, is another black mark on the history of American government.
 
It's lovely to see people who claim to uphold the Constitution but do not support that oath with any of their actions. Just another Bush yes-man. If "obscenity" is one of his top priorities I think we're in for a worse ride than we had with Ashcroft.
 
The borders are porous...

Al-Qaeda wants to set off a dirty bomb in the US....

and the AG is concerned about porno movies. :barf:

I bet he'll send Larry Flynt to Gitmo next.
 
Anyone who claims to support Second Amendment rights while condoning the suppression of First Amendment rights clearly understands neither Amendment.

The two are inextricably linked, and to preserve one means preserving the other.
 
Gonzales praised the 30-year low in the crime rate and touted the new Violent Crime Impact Teams, inspired by President Bush's Safe Neighborhoods (search) initiative. The project coordinates federal, state and local law enforcement partners "to drive down the rate of violent crime, crimes committed with guns and trafficking in illegal drugs."

The teams, led by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms.....

I don't see this as a good thing. :scrutiny:
 
Funny he didn't say anything about putting the army on the border to protect us LOL . He is just like GWB and the ones we have in the congress and senate in both parties A traitor to our country
 
Here in this city a homeless man found a video in a dumpster. It showed a man sexually molesting a little girl. It was a home video and the mans back was to the camera. The homeless guy gave the video to the police and they went to the school district and with some software that the school has they were able to determine from a school photo who the girl is. She is nine now and was younger when the video was made. The police are happy that they cought the guy and are sure thay have the right guy.


As for the rights of the Al Quaida terrorists suspects that remains an interesting question. We claim to be a good nation and we contract the incarceration and extreme measures of extracting information out the third parties overseas. We have seen over the years where accused criminals are extended all sorts of rights that we as citizens may not receive if we are caught up in something.

The prison in Colorado where some suspects are locked up has allowed them to send out mail apparantly w/o censorship. They have been urging their fellows to press on against the US here at home. Since when are convicts allowed to foment rebellion from the inside? If an honest citizen mentions a fault in the government he is sometimes taken to task over it.

This AG will try to make a name for himself and we will end up being the poorer for it. He will try to ingratiate himself with illegals from the other side of our southern borders in particular. Just my NSHO.
 
>>>Gonzales also said that people are not guaranteed free speech rights when they are in the business of distributing obscene materials.

What a joke. So what do we do now, spend billions of dollars we ain't got busting porn sites? How about creating a new Govt Department to fight overseas traffic of reading material our govt objects to? I'm not into porn but come on. What happened to the real priorities here? Seems lately that gun related websites are considered by many to be objectional or obscene. Maybe they should just add this to the Patriot Act. :banghead:

This whole thing is about as "STUPID" as taking cigarettes out of our sea rations. Now you wouldn't want to cut your life short and die of Cancer in Iraq or elsewhere would you? :barf:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top