Got fingerprinted today...

Status
Not open for further replies.

budney

member
Joined
Mar 27, 2007
Messages
741
Location
Pittsburgh
What an experience!

First, to skip forward to the end, I have three questions for anyone who knows:

1) When taking my prints with the fancy scanner gizmo, the machine twice said "No Match," and the trooper clicked on them and answered "Yes" to the question, "Override and use these rejected prints?" Is that likely to cause a problem when I submit the print cards to Utah, Florida and Connecticut?

2) The CT application had a standard blue form and an unusual green form (CT-129, if I recall correctly). The trooper tried to use ink, and put a very faint left thumbprint in the right thumprint box, pronounced the form ruined, and suggested I fill it out but attach a standard blue card for the prints. Is this likely to result in a rejection? (I'll call CT soon; just wondering if anyone knows.)

3) The standard cards from FL and CT both had the ORI field completed. The trooper couldn't figure out how to print cards without printing the ORI, or to change the ORI to the FL or CT ones. So he printed two cards, whited out the ORI, and wrote in the CT and FL ORIs. Is that likely to cause a problem?

Sorry to spoil the story by putting the questions first, but I'm hoping someone can fill me in. Needless to say, what I thought would be a quick and painless process was quite painful after all.

The trip started out at 15:00, when I dragged my son off to the PSP barracks a half hour away. We too 45 minutes to get there, because the Internet directions were bad and I missed a turn. After we got there, we waited almost a half hour before they got around to us.

When the trooper came out, I gave him my cards, and told him I needed a printout for FL, one for UT, two for CT, and one for my records. He went in the back for a while, and then came out demanding to know "why so many states?" I told him: "FL for when I go there on business; CT for when I visit family; and UT to cover the states in between." That satisfied him, and he ushered my son and I into the back.

Having been forewarned, my carry was locked in the glove compartment. I put the two magazines aside, got wanded, and put them back in my pocket. He was cool through this procedure.

At the scanner, the trooper had trouble setting up the form; after a while I inquired and he said he was trying to find a way to either change the ORI or leave it blank, and he couldn't figure out how. I suggested putting postits over the ORIs and putting my forms through, and he indicated that he'd be in big trouble if the printer jammed. He finally printed a bunch of cards and whited out the ORI, copying the data from the CT and FL cards and leaving the IT card's ORI blank.

Then he tried to figure a way to print to the CT green card, and couldn't come up with anything. Reluctantly, he rolled out some ink (which was pretty dry), inked my left thumb, and planted it in the right-thumb box. After looking at it a while, he declared that it was obviously a left thumb in a right-thumb box, so the form was botched. He printed another regular card to attach, and wrote an apology/explanation on a postit.

Finally he fingerprinted my son and printed two cards, one for me and one for Josh. Unfortunately, it wasn't the fun and interesting process I'd hoped for, because by that point he was pretty bored--and incidentally, was late for his own birthday party. We made it home by 18:15, an hour and a quarter late for his party. Luckily, the party went well and my saint of a wife did a good job covering for me.

All in all, my compliments to the trooper, who was very cooperative and helpful, and never lost patience with us. I was just a bit surprised that it wasn't a routine, quicky operation, and now I'm a bit worried that one or more of the three states will require me to have them redone after all this.

--Len.
 
The last time I was fingerprinted, the lady government police officer tried to twist my hand all around and messed things up so badly, that on the fifth card I asked if I could do my own. Having done a few hundred prints of other people, I had no trouble producing a very nice set.

I was fully cooperative, of course, and I almost asked her what she would do with some fighting drunk or some "lady" who was pulling hair and scratching eyeballs. I didn't want to imply that she was less than competent, though I hope she realized it herself and got someone to teach her.

(Never heard from the FBI, so I guess I am still me.)

Jim
 
I just got prints done last week for a Form 4. The nice Sgt. who I am on a first name basis with did the prints while we talked gardening, before I knew it we were done. She is great! Got all ten prints on both cards in just a few minutes.

I really like living here in Maine! The law enforcement in my neck of the woods is VERY pro gun. My local CLEO is going shooting with me next month, how cool is that? :D
 
Here in Mass we have to be fingerprinted every time we renew our firearm licenses. All licensing applications is through the local PD. In the last few years the state, as gone electronic. The police now use electronic finger print scanners, and all forms are sent by computers to the state Criminal History Board for processing. Soon, all gun stores will have finger print scanners so every time we go to buy a weapon or ammo, we will have are finger prints scanned then the dealer will have our info on their computer. Kinda scary but the real pain is the system is not fully without issues that arise and worried some of the info might not be completely secured.
 
1) No, that's not a problem. It's the opposite.

2) That is probably not going to be a problem. FD-258's should be fine as long as the prints are clear.

3) That's a known issue. Everyone white outs the ORI field. When I called up the Department of the Army contact number in VA and requested FD-258's, two out of my four showed up in the mail with white out in the ORI field. One wasn't even an FD-258. It's counterintuitive and it looks ghetto, but it won't predjudice your application. Apparently almost no one in the United States knows how to print them blank.
 
I had to be fingerprinted for my KS CHL down at the county jail. Got there, filled out the paperwork in the lobby and waited for them to take me back to intake/booking.

As I walk in one of the jailors was putting on latex gloves, at which time I stopped and said, "Whoa, hey, I'm just here for fingerprints guys." He laughed and motioned me back in.

When it was over he said every print he had to do that day ended up in a fight so mine were a pleasant change.
 
Last time I had prints done I recognized the the guy doing it, he said "Naw thats my twin brother", turns out his brother is our new Marshal...

They have the new scanner, but I guess they all haven't been trained on it, I got the old black ink prints done.
 
Been fingerprinted about 6 times over the last 20+/- years, starting with ink & cardboard and ending with the 2cd generation computer scanners they have now. I had the same experience list in #1 in the original post, of the technician (not a trooper) hitting the override button to accept prints the computer was trying to reject. Got a letter a few weeks latter saying I had to come back in for a do-over; the FBI rejected the prints when there system couldn’t read them. Seems taking good, readable finger prints is skill not everyone who works at can actually do constantly. I think the tech I got the first time just wanted to get rid of me so she could go on break, so she accepted scans she knew were no good.
 
I have only been fingerprinted once and that was for my FFL application (which I never followed up on). It wasn't required the first time I had an FFL. A sheriff's deputy took them and was very friendly.
 
I was fully cooperative, of course, and I almost asked her what she would do with some fighting drunk or some "lady" who was pulling hair and scratching eyeballs.

I did ask my guy that question (who was very professional and had me done and out within five minutes).

His reply: "We don't bother. If they want to fight, we let them think about it behind bars. When they're ready to let us print them, we do it nice and easy like you and I are doing it now".

Good answer I thought. :)
 
Gads, I've been fingerprinted so many times I think my fingers are going to stay purple. The new scanning machines are good but it really depends on the operator. Security in FedWorld really sucks for that sort of thing <sigh>.

Most of the time the process was pretty smooth, but when it isn't it seems like the "tech" just can't get things straightened out and it takes forever.
 
Do you ever get any feedback on the FBI check for employment? Do you get a card or letter or anything? My process (apart from my year-old CCW check) started about six months ago, and I've heard nothing....

... or do you just wait until the masked men come to your door at oh-dark-thirty and then you know you didn't pass.

One thing I've heard is that a couple of folks suddently couldn't pass the NICS check and found out their "Security Clearances" had expired and this kind of concerns me.

So how long is it good for?

(I have nothing to fear from a background check, but I'm starting to look for "closure" on mine.)
 
Background check via the NICS? Only that particular time. IF you are going for a DOD clearance, it takes anywhere from 2 months to a year for a Secret right now, and more than that for a Top Secret. BTW, having a DOD clearance means nothing to the NICS system. It won't "speed it up" or "assist" in getting it done.
 
tinygnat219:
[blockquote]Background check via the NICS? Only that particular time. IF you are going for a DOD clearance, it takes anywhere from 2 months to a year for a Secret right now, and more than that for a Top Secret.[/blockquote]

No, just a regular employment check under the new Homeland Security stuff. Geeze, they wanted to know the nicknames of my left nostril and right gonad. ("Pete" and "Butch" respectively, in case you're interested.)

I'm still interested in how "expiration" of a clearance can screw you up on the NICS check for firearms purchase. As I mentioned, I'd heard of this happening on one of the gun boards... annnnd:

ZeSpectre:

[blockquote]Actually being "in process" for a clearance can trip NICS up. (gee, ask me how I know that one...[/blockquote]

OK, I'll bite.... "Hoowwww do you know that one, Johnny?"

{BTW, They had to send my electronic fingerprints in twice. Fortunately, I'd PDFed the originals for myself just for documentation's sake. (Pearl Harbor file, you know?) So I could prove that I had been printed and wasn't pulling any fast ones on them.}
 
1) When taking my prints with the fancy scanner gizmo, the machine twice said "No Match," and the trooper clicked on them and answered "Yes" to the question, "Override and use these rejected prints?" Is that likely to cause a problem when I submit the print cards to Utah, Florida and Connecticut?

Sounds like the Trooper who did your prints either rolled you out of sequence, or did such in incredibly bad job that the machine rejected the prints.

On a standard fingerprint card, there are 10 blocks, one for each finger.
Each finger is rolled in its corresponding block, nail edge to nail edge.

On the bottom of the card are blocks for the left and right hands (index, middle, ring and pinkie) and also the thumbs. These prints are not "rolled" they are just pressed onto the card (or the scanner as it were) These prints are known as "slaps"

The Livescan machine compares the "slaps" to the rolled prints and if they do not match, the warning box will pop up. This can be over ridden by the machine's operator, but shouldn't be. The machine is telling the operator that there is a problem with the prints. Overiding the error box is just being lazy.

And no, I didn't stay at a Holiday Inn last night, I really AM a fingerprint analyst! :)
 
Uhhh not to sound nutty, but wouldn't it be better to have the print set a little fuzzy?

I have a big problem with the idea that I have to get finger printed and photographed to get a CHL... I think it's crap. Criminals carry with no CHL, but in order for me to carry I have to get "booked". Just seems backwards eh?
 
The Livescan machine compares the "slaps" to the rolled prints and if they do not match, the warning box will pop up. This can be over ridden by the machine's operator, but shouldn't be. The machine is telling the operator that there is a problem with the prints. Overiding the error box is just being lazy.
THANKS for the explanation! I wondered what the heck they were "matching" against. The FBI? HSD? "No match" sounded ominous to me.

--Len.
 
Finally, something I can answer!!

On your question #1, about the prints being "overridden". They system WE use, is called LiveScan, don't know what they were using but it's probably similar.

The sequence is to take the flat impressions of both hands first, then roll each individual finger. When you roll each finger the computer does 2 things, it measures the quality of the print being rolled (if less then 70% i think, it's rejected) anyhow, once the quality is determined and accepted then it compares the rolled image to the flat image, if there is a match no problem, next finger. If it doesn't match then you have to re-roll. This can be caused by any number of reasons, from accidently rolling the wrong finger to computer error. Our system forces you to try this 3 times, 3 good quality prints with failure to match errors. If after 3 failures, and you have a good, passing quality, print you may override the system and save the print even with the error. If you know you're printing the correct finger and the computer says you aren't....well you can't argue with a computer.

So, hopefully you won't have a problem later on. It's a known issue, with no way to fix that I'm aware of. Some get kicked back others go through without a problem. Doesnt' seem to be any rhyme or reason to it.

Good luck;
 
Yeah, that would be real cool, to have fuzzy prints. That way, the guy who murdered the three kids and the two cops asking quesions, could have two pairs of prints to ID him....yours and his.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top