Greenleaf Idaho... to require people to own guns?

Status
Not open for further replies.
I believe a town called Kennesaw just up the road from me was the first to do this. The break-in related crime rate dropped like a stone shortly thereafter. Go figure.
All true. I live there. I moved to Georgia after living in one of the slummier parts of Baltimore, and all I wanted was to be away from crime. The realtor asked me what my main criteria was, and I said I wanted to be in the area with the lowest crime-rate. Without hesitating, he said, "Kennesaw."

After seeing the crime stats pre- and post-1983 (when the ordnance was passed), it was pretty obvious.

Thing is, although our ordinance does require a firearm in every house, there's been no attempt at enforcement. (Enforcing it would require searching houses, which would violate the 4A, and it would probably result in the ordnance being thrown out)

In any case, it's the intent that matters. Lots of homes in Kennesaw have guns, the city encourages it, and criminals know it. Surrounding towns Acworth and Woodstock have much worse crime problems than we do.
 
Yes, the Militia Act of 1792 did require folks being armed and was enacted by some of the founding fathers, but such enactments, even by the founding fathers can still be flawed and even be illegal. The act was racist, sexist, and required a form of registration of gun owners.

---------------------------

I. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress assembled, That each and every free able-bodied white male citizen of the respective States, resident therein, who is or shall be of age of eighteen years, and under the age of forty-five years (except as is herein after excepted) shall severally and respectively be enrolled in the militia, by the Captain or Commanding Officer of the company, within whose bounds such citizen shall reside, and that within twelve months after the passing of this Act. And it shall at all time hereafter be the duty of every such Captain or Commanding Officer of a company, to enroll every such citizen as aforesaid, and also those who shall, from time to time, arrive at the age of 18 years, or being at the age of 18 years, and under the age of 45 years (except as before excepted) shall come to reside within his bounds; and shall without delay notify such citizen of the said enrollment, by the proper non-commissioned Officer of the company, by whom such notice may be proved. That every citizen, so enrolled and notified, shall, within six months thereafter, provide himself with a good musket or firelock, a sufficient bayonet and belt, two spare flints, and a knapsack, a pouch, with a box therein, to contain not less than twenty four cartridges, suited to the bore of his musket or firelock, each cartridge to contain a proper quantity of power and ball; or with a good rifle, knapsack, shot-pouch, and power-horn, twenty balls suited to the bore of his rifle, and a quarter of a power of power; and shall appear so armed, accoutred and provided, when called out to exercise or into service, except, that when called out on company days to exercise only, he may appear without a knapsack. That the commissioned Officers shall severally be armed with a sword or hanger, and espontoon; and that from and after five years from the passing of this Act, all muskets from arming the militia as is herein required, shall be of bores sufficient for balls of the eighteenth part of a pound; and every citizen so enrolled, and providing himself with the arms, ammunition and accoutrements, required as aforesaid, shall hold the same exempted from all suits, distresses, executions or sales, for debt or for the payment of taxes.
 
Its a novel idea, but...

I dont like the government telling people that they HAVE to do something.

Also, if there was a procedure for certifying that every household does have a gun, it would require some form of gun registration. And I totally oppose anything of that sort.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top