Yup - Plaxico Should Fight It
From the Website "Redstate" re: The WSJ's commentary on Burress
"For Mr. Burress, there is obviously not much leeway for him to beat this case because of the law and Mayor Bloomberg is speaking out publicly to make an example of Burress. However, based on Heller, I would appeal this case on the grounds that the law is unconstitutional, agreeing with Kopel, because of his notoriety, he obtained a gun permit in Florida for protection, now that he lives and works in New Jersey and New York, he still maintains that notoriety and still will need a firearm for protection, especially in the biggest metropolis in the country. To discriminate against non-residents applying for a permit is unconstitutional. Also a little odd is that New York not recognizing the Florida issued permit, but to recognize out of state gay marriage, is a manipulation of the full faith and credit clause, Article IV, Section 1 of the Constitution. (I am not a savant in Constitutional law, but I assume states have the right to manipulate this, based that they are separate and sovereign entities)
If New York had some sensible laws, Mr. Burress would have received his license to carry permit based on Florida giving it to him, background check, etc. Instead, he’s going to be fighting for his freedom because of New York’s discrimination, as well as personal stupidity"
I liked the comment about how NY manipulates the "Full Faith & Credit Cause