Loosedhorse
member
Perhaps you have noticed that one side in the upcoming presidential/congressional elections has been looking at the polling numbers and getting more and more confident of their victory. They've even begun "analyzing" the reasons for their up-coming triumph: "This is a repudiation of..."
My prediction (you read it here first!): Swollen with confidence, someone on that side is going to propose "common sense gun safety regulations" soon, BEFORE the elections: close the loopholes, reasonable restrictions, assault weapons, etc.--all the standard rhetoric.
Why? So after the election, if things work out as they are predicting, they will say: "We have received a mandate from the American people--this is something they elected us to do!"
We've heard for years that gun control is "off the table," "a political non-starter," "poison" that no politician wanted to touch--I've never bought into that, but I think it--and the recent Heller decision--may have bred a lot of complacency into gun owners. But I think the prospect of a big victory is changing the ideas of what can be passed during the next administration.
My q's: Anyone think I'm wrong--if so, why? And, if I'm right, anything we can do to counter it?
(PS: I am NOT looking for "this candidate is bad" political stuff, but rather: is this scenario a likely threat to our gun rights, and if so, how do we mitigate the damage?)
My prediction (you read it here first!): Swollen with confidence, someone on that side is going to propose "common sense gun safety regulations" soon, BEFORE the elections: close the loopholes, reasonable restrictions, assault weapons, etc.--all the standard rhetoric.
Why? So after the election, if things work out as they are predicting, they will say: "We have received a mandate from the American people--this is something they elected us to do!"
We've heard for years that gun control is "off the table," "a political non-starter," "poison" that no politician wanted to touch--I've never bought into that, but I think it--and the recent Heller decision--may have bred a lot of complacency into gun owners. But I think the prospect of a big victory is changing the ideas of what can be passed during the next administration.
My q's: Anyone think I'm wrong--if so, why? And, if I'm right, anything we can do to counter it?
(PS: I am NOT looking for "this candidate is bad" political stuff, but rather: is this scenario a likely threat to our gun rights, and if so, how do we mitigate the damage?)