Gun Digest - "We Know Guns" - Really?

Status
Not open for further replies.

bergmen

Member.
Joined
Feb 14, 2011
Messages
1,319
Location
Ukiah, California
I subscribe to Gun Digest (which I will let expire as soon as it runs out). Underneath the magazine title is the phrase "We Know Guns" as if to indicate that they are a trustworthy authority. I have seen some odd letters published that suggest that they really do not know guns.

First was a letter by someone who claimed that he had some old ammo that had primers fail because of "fatigue". I wrote the magazine (which they published in the September 9th issue) indicating that metal fatigue is ..."a dynamic failure of a metal structure that has been (or is being) subjected to physical force within its elastic or plastic state. ... (Primers) can degrade in strength due to other factors such as corrosion or chemical exposure, but they cannot fail due to fatigue."

Then, this month (October 7, 2013) I read another doozy. In a letter titled "Double-Action Defined" it states "When you say 'double action' in regard to a revolver, it means you have two ways to fire the revolver. One way to fire a double-action revolver is...where the long press of the trigger cocks or loads the firing mechanism, then releases it. The second way to fire the revolver is to cock the firing mechanism, then release it with a short, lighter press of the trigger."

I wonder what he would call my DAO (Double Action Only) revolvers? No way to cock those snubbies.

My understanding of "double action" means that two actions occur by pulling the trigger without cocking the hammer first - cocking, then firing (with cylinder rotation taking place during the cocking action). With single action, a single action of releasing the hammer occurs when pulling the trigger (once cocked).

Dan
 
There's some point in the pursuit of any field of study where you'll realize that whatever popular press and/or media exists to cover that field is no longer sufficient to provide further education for you and you must look elsewhere to increase your knowledge.

It is almost certainly the case that as your own knowledge of guns becomes more encyclopedic you'll have to search farther and longer to find nuggets of information that you did not already know, and descriptions, explanations, and treatises which you can accept as written without challenging them from your own knowledge and experiences.

Fortunately there are venues where deeper understandings and broader scopes are available than what the popular press can offer. Forums like THR are one such venue. :)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top