Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Gun manufacturer's Markings?

Discussion in 'General Gun Discussions' started by boredelmo, May 30, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. boredelmo

    boredelmo member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2006
    Messages:
    720
    Location:
    Austin/Houston, Texas
    Someone I know wants to sell me a gun, but his dad sanded off the manufacturers markings to make it "cleaner". You can still read it, but not 100% clearly. The serial number is untouched. The half sanded markings are on the frame.

    I'm kinda uneasy on this deal because I thought it was illegal to tamper with the manufacturer's marking. But then I got to thinking about the people to "melt" guns or take off markings from slides of 1911's.

    Thanks in advance.
     
  2. Thernlund

    Thernlund Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2007
    Messages:
    2,347
    Location:
    Phoenix, AZ
    It's illegal to tamper with the serial number. But the manufactures logos, I don't think that matters at all.

    Some guns just don't have any anyway.

    I wouldn't worry about it so long as the SN is clear. If it's an import, the import mark needs to be able to be read as well.

    You didn't say what kind of gun.


    -T.
     
  3. boredelmo

    boredelmo member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2006
    Messages:
    720
    Location:
    Austin/Houston, Texas
    Kel-tec. My mom likes my p3at so much I'm trying to get her one of her own at a good price.
     
  4. Old Fuff

    Old Fuff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    23,908
    Location:
    Arizona
    The BATF&E could get upset if the manufacturer or importer's name was removed. They need that if they have to make a trace. It's not that they couldn't identify the gun, but rather that they'd have to work at it. :uhoh:
     
  5. Thernlund

    Thernlund Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2007
    Messages:
    2,347
    Location:
    Phoenix, AZ
    Honestly, I don't think I'd be real concerned as long as, like I said, the SN is clear.


    -T.
     
  6. boredelmo

    boredelmo member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2006
    Messages:
    720
    Location:
    Austin/Houston, Texas
    But it's not illegal correct?

    I mean, they could get upset at someone for owning an "arsenal" or guns but they can't arrest a guy for just having lots of guns. (i know this may have happened before, but we're technically speaking)
     
  7. Thernlund

    Thernlund Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2007
    Messages:
    2,347
    Location:
    Phoenix, AZ
    I don't believe that it is. Just as long as the serial number is intact.

    Ummm... What's the difference? Or maybe I don't understand?


    -T.
     
  8. ieszu

    ieszu Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2007
    Messages:
    314
    Location:
    Trying to figure that out....
    There is a bigger issue involved with removing importer/manufacturer markings than the legal quandry. On some guns, if you remove enough metal to erase the manufacturers markings, you are tampering with the heat treatment and could cause a problem unless it has been re-heat treated.

    The legal issue is easy: If you remove it you can go to jail, but if you buy it that way in a private sale you have not broken any laws. It isn't so much that it would save the ATF money, but think of a gun like the 1911, if you remove all markings except the s/n, how would you know who made it? Is it a Caspian, Springfield, Taurus or a Colt???? It becomes impossible to trace, and thus they made it illegal to remove manufacturer/importer markings, although you can remove things like warning stamps (like Rugers) and calibers...
     
  9. boredelmo

    boredelmo member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2006
    Messages:
    720
    Location:
    Austin/Houston, Texas
    "Upset" = mad, but can't really do anything about it.

    edit:
    The plot thickens! How do I prove that it wasn't me that messed up the marks?
     
  10. Thernlund

    Thernlund Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2007
    Messages:
    2,347
    Location:
    Phoenix, AZ
    Don't be silly. Even one of us could sort out the origin of a serial number in an hour or two, even without seeing the actual weapon. Collectively, it could probably be identified in less than 30 minutes.

    When/if the time comes, the original owner testifies to it in court.

    But two points...

    If this is on the slide, it doesn't matter. The receiver is the firearm according to the ATF.

    Second... you said they were still partially visible. If that's so, this is all moot.


    -T.


    EDIT: Case in point. What this guy did to this Hardballer is legal.

    http://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/showthread.php?t=103298 SN is still intact, but the slide has had all marking removed.
     
    Last edited: May 30, 2008
  11. ieszu

    ieszu Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2007
    Messages:
    314
    Location:
    Trying to figure that out....
    You can't.... and with the ATF the way it is, you are guilty until proven innocent.

    When I was in Gunsmithing school I was refinishing an old Mauser, and the pitting was through the importer markings and the s/n. I told the ATF, and they told me to take a picture before and after of the effected areas, and that I had to re-stamp the markings in roughly the same place. Thus I was able to re-stamp in slightly smaller size and in a nicer area... just had to make sure the markings were visible with the naked eye. I kept the pictures with me, and when I sold the gun, I gave a copy of the pictures and the ATF letter to the new owner... I explained he should keep it until he decides to sell it, then a copy should be sent along to the purchaser.
     
  12. ieszu

    ieszu Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2007
    Messages:
    314
    Location:
    Trying to figure that out....
    And on a custom gun, or a gun from a small manufacturer? How can you truly tell? If they make a law it has to apply to everyone, and not be based on the collective knowledge of THR.

    I wish the law was different (I hate some the billboard markings on some guns), but if you want to stay out of jail, you have to follow the law.
     
  13. Thernlund

    Thernlund Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2007
    Messages:
    2,347
    Location:
    Phoenix, AZ
    I was only making a point. EVEN WE could sort it out without seeing the firearm. Even a custom. Even from a small manufacturer. You think the ATF can't?

    Whether or not they'd railroad him, I don't know. Maybe. But that's beyond the scope of this discussion, and I don't play that game anyway.

    Playing the odds, I doubt this will ever be an issue for the OP, even if it does find its way into LE hands.


    -T.
     
  14. just carl

    just carl Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2008
    Messages:
    45
    Not sure exactly why even bring it up unless you live in some area where there are gun inspections in your home, office or whatever. So far in well over 50 years of shooting, I've never had anyone inpect any of my guns at ranges. And for sure no one gets into my house to inspect guns. So who would know?
     
  15. boredelmo

    boredelmo member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2006
    Messages:
    720
    Location:
    Austin/Houston, Texas
    I just would like to stay 100% legal, esp since this is for my mom. This might be her purse gun so what if she has to use it? What if she is disarmed for a normal traffic stop (like some stories on THR) and the cop notices/inspects it?

    I wouldn't buy stolen car parts "just because no one would ever find out".
     
  16. ieszu

    ieszu Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2007
    Messages:
    314
    Location:
    Trying to figure that out....

    I agree with you, railroading is beyond the scope of our discussion, and is OT.

    I was just mentioning the regulation, and that the ATF does not care about what people like us know... they merely care if they can claim it is outside the "average person's" knowledge base.

    Given that regulations and the interpretation of the regulations change over time, perhaps the OP should ask the local ATF branch (anonymously of course) what he should do? He should ask for the letter in writing, and if they give the OK, he should then proceed with buying the gun, and keep a copy of the letter for his records.... just in case :)
     
  17. Thernlund

    Thernlund Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2007
    Messages:
    2,347
    Location:
    Phoenix, AZ
    I wouldn't even worry about it. Hell, some S&W revolvers have been so worn as to almost remove the S&W logo.

    As long as the SN is visible. And you said the manufacturer markings were still there, but faint.

    This is all moot I think.

    For what it's worth, I would buy the gun. Or at least, the issues you mention wouldn't even factor into my decision not to buy it. Let's look at the facts...

    1. Domestic manufacture.
    2. Clearly an identifiable design, logos or not.
    3. Logos are faint, but still there.
    4. They're on the slide (you didn't say, but I assume they are).
    5. SN is clear

    No way this is a problem.


    -T.
     
  18. Thernlund

    Thernlund Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2007
    Messages:
    2,347
    Location:
    Phoenix, AZ
    I think many would agree that doing so would be the fast track to erroneous information, strange as that may seem.


    -T.
     
  19. boredelmo

    boredelmo member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2006
    Messages:
    720
    Location:
    Austin/Houston, Texas
    I really cant find a straight answer online. Anymore help?
     
  20. ieszu

    ieszu Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2007
    Messages:
    314
    Location:
    Trying to figure that out....
    Perhaps, but if he gets an answer in writing, he can't really get blamed by them....


    But if you can still see the markings, and the s/n, then he is ok... if they are visible, even if worn, you should have no problem.
     
  21. rocinante

    rocinante Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2007
    Messages:
    1,306
    Location:
    Alpharetta GA
    I just got a used FIE E15 22 revolver and all it has on it is a serial number and the FIE importer info engraved. A little disappointed it didn't have the country of origin or manufacturer on it.

    Per discussion on another board the only thing that can't be touched is the serial number.
     
  22. boredelmo

    boredelmo member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2006
    Messages:
    720
    Location:
    Austin/Houston, Texas
    Sir, do you have a link to thank forum? Or PM?
     
  23. 230RN
    • Contributing Member

    230RN Marines raising the left-leaning Pisa tower.

    Joined:
    May 27, 2006
    Messages:
    6,632
    Location:
    Calirado
    I don't know anything about it, so I'll make a guess, too.

    It's probably legal unless it's illegal.

    On the other hand, it's probably illegal unless it's legal.

    I really wish people would not attempt to answer posts with no firm knowledge.

    The best advice I've seen is to get a letter from the ATF. Call first for a verbal opinion in order to make the decision to buy, then write a followup letter, using the name of the Agent to whom you spoke, requesting the answer in writing.

    I'm reminded of the umpteen pages of posts on whether it's legal to use a laser sight on a gun without the safety labels affixed to the gun. The so-called "answers" were all over the place.

    So I wrote an inquiry letter to the Agency involved, the FDA. They received it on May 16th.

    I expect a reply shortly.

    Horses' mouths and all.

    Sheesh!
     
    Last edited: May 31, 2008
  24. 762 shooter

    762 shooter Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2008
    Messages:
    95
    All I could find in the ATF regs is no one may obliterate a serial number. Nothing I can find on Manufacturing markings.
     
  25. Thernlund

    Thernlund Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2007
    Messages:
    2,347
    Location:
    Phoenix, AZ
    My findings as well.

    But my original point is that I think this is all just acedemic. Based on the OPs description, there is no issue I think.


    -T.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page