Gun Misrepresentations by the Media and Others

Status
Not open for further replies.

Phatty

Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2009
Messages
701
Location
Southern Illinois
With the flurry of gun discussions occuring on countless news broadcasts and media stories following the CT school shootings, it's reminded me of the numerous misrepresentations that the media makes when it refers to or describes firearms.

A list of my favorites are the following:

1) "High-powered" rifles. Is there some type of rifle that I don't know about that plugs into an electrical socket and draws a ton of power to operate? And what rifle would be considered low-powered? Every rifle ever described by the media is always "high-powered" so why don't they just call it a rifle? I think I've figured out that a BB gun is a normal rifle and everything else is a high-powered rifle.

2) Automatic weapons (instead of semi-automatic). I think this term is sometimes used intentionally to misrepresent a particular weapon as a machine gun, but most of the time its just sloppy reporting. By far, this is the most common misrepresentation you'll find in a story reporting on a mass gun crime, particularly in the early stages. Not once, ever, have I read a story that reported a person used an automatic weapon to perform a mass killing (in the United States) has it ever panned out. Sometimes the media will even leave no doubt and call the weapon a fully-automatic rifle or machinegun. I'm sure what happens is that some police officer somewhere tells a reporter on the ground that the assailant used a semi-automatic rifle, and somewhere in the translation it eventually turns into a machinegun.

3) "Gun designed to kill humans." Yeah, that's the point. This statement usually accompanies the "assault weapon" description, which I've left off this lest because its so obvious. Sometimes the ultimate measure (killing a person) is the only way to defend yourself or another. And the tool to accomplish that task is a gun designed to kill. Unfortunately, we don't have Star Trek technology where we can set our guns to "stun" instead of "kill."

4) "Designed to pierce body armor." Again, this is usually used in conjunction with "assault weapon."

5) "High-speed" gun (if not talking about a machinegun, which they never are). Are they talking about Billy the Kid? Every semi-auto or revolver will shoot at the speed of the operator pulling the trigger.

Do you have any others to add to the list? (I'm sure that I'm forgetting a bunch.)
 
I just read a CNN article that really made me mad. They said that it is obvious the founding fathers favored heavy gun regulation.
 
They said that it is obvious the founding fathers favored heavy gun regulation.
Well, yeah, it does say "well-regulated" right there in the Second Amendment. You really know someone is misinformed when they go down that route.
 
I find it laughable how the people calling for a new Assault Weapons Ban are generally uninformed about the one that's been in place in Connecticut since 1994...

/I have a Saiga in 7.62x51, but the same rifle in 7.62x39 is illegal here.
 
Do you have any others to add to the list? (I'm sure that I'm forgetting a bunch.)
Heard a new one(to me) this weekend
The reporter said he had a Sig Sauer which is a "fast action" pistol.
 
Here's one from Senator Warner (D-W. Va.) in a Washington Post article today:

“There’s got to be a way to put reasonable restrictions, particularly as we look at assault weapons, as we look at these fast clips of ammunition.”

Anyone know about these "fast clips of ammunition?"
 
Been hearing "high powered" rifle all my life. I was in a gun store today. They had a large rack of common hunting rifles labeled with a sign saying "high powered rifles".
 
I just like how all morning it was the pistols he used and the AR in the car. After the feds showed it was the AR that did it with all it's 30rd mags. I would have thought the local LEO's would have ID'd a .223 case as different than a 10mm or 9mm without federal help. Smells fishy.

But the magazines and rifle are being targeted as the cause for it all.

I just love the "weapons of war" references, and the "no one needs xxxx" I don't "need" the Harley in my garage either with a 250 Virago sitting beside it, but I sure like having it!
 
I find it laughable how the people calling for a new Assault Weapons Ban are generally uninformed about the one that's been in place in Connecticut since 1994...

I fear that a lot of the politicians that are using this are informed, and are deliberately misrepresenting (ie. "lying").

Technologically, the difference between the AR-15 that was banned in 1994, the Bushmaster used in the massacre, a Browning autoloading shotgun and a 1911 is nil.
 
"Mother's Gun Obsession"

FYI, I've heard the lady owned less than half a dozen guns...
Talk about your biased coverage--I hope someone in the Lanza estate is still around to sue the pants off the Post for this garbage. The got all the miscues; from "clip" to "armory"

I've also heard talk of the ammo used being meant for "deep penetration" which I'm guessing is FMJ--but I thought hollow points were the bad ones?

TCB
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top