Thin Black Line
Member
It has seemed to me that whenever the SHTF in countries like Rwanda,
Bosnia, etc., that it has been the people who were armed and headed for
the hills were the ones who survived. In both of these cases, they also
fought their way back and took the country from the killers.
I found it ironic that the brits can arrest suspects who were planning to
board planes with flammable toothpaste, but a man accused of helping kill
800,000 in Rwanda has been allowed to live care-free in Manchester, England:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/manchester/4797001.stm
Video report of the same:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/help/3681938.stm
Isn't it interesting that there's a push to remove guns from civilians hands,
exert some kind of central global authority, yet for the most part fail to
pursue those who had a part in the mass killings of unarmed civilians?
Bosnia, etc., that it has been the people who were armed and headed for
the hills were the ones who survived. In both of these cases, they also
fought their way back and took the country from the killers.
I found it ironic that the brits can arrest suspects who were planning to
board planes with flammable toothpaste, but a man accused of helping kill
800,000 in Rwanda has been allowed to live care-free in Manchester, England:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/manchester/4797001.stm
Video report of the same:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/help/3681938.stm
Isn't it interesting that there's a push to remove guns from civilians hands,
exert some kind of central global authority, yet for the most part fail to
pursue those who had a part in the mass killings of unarmed civilians?