I don't know about the Stevens being sub-moa. A couple might be, but the same way the stock is cheesy because it is a $275 rifle, you aren't going to buy sub-moa performance for that money when others pay $1,000 or more for it.
http://www.shootingtimes.com/longgun_reviews/stevens200_041106/index2.html
1.33" average of five 5-shot groups. 3-shot groups are lame for measuring accuracy since I've had dozens of 3-shot groups go into .3moa. 5-shot is minimum for testing accuracy. That was with the 168smk in a handload at 2625 which is great load. The others did 2" give or take.
Still, for $275 - that is EXCELLENT. But please, spare me the sub-moa stuff. It is so misleading. This forum, just like the rest of the web perpetuates the impression that just about anything you buy off the shelf is going to be sub-moa shooter if 1] you do your part 2] you handload.
That happens a lot with NEF's. Someone shoots a 3-shot .25moa group and declares their rifle a sub 1/2 shooter out of the box. And they do so in a thread where someone is asking about the
typical accuracy of that rifle, not the miracle group. Then, some more people come along with their fish-stories or half-truths and you get a few more positive posts. The guy goes and buys it and finds that they can't get it to shoot a single group under 2" ...then you see them posting on Graybeard forums all distressed because their gun won't shoot. The guys who made those claims will then advise on how to fix it. Get an O-ring. Try some funky shoot/clean/shoot break in procedure. Judge it only after the first 250rds when the bore smooths. Rest it all the way back at the trigger guard. All when the culprit is obvious. It is a $200 rifle!
The sad irony is, a gun that is shooting 2" at 100 yards is viewed as an issue or a problem. That's the bizarre part. Particularly when it's a hunting rifle and that is plenty of accuracy for that, and generally speaking, 2moa is good rifle accuracy - sans the sub-moa craze that goes around web.