Has the National RA chimed in on this yet??

Status
Not open for further replies.

daorhgih

member
Joined
Jan 25, 2008
Messages
608
I got no letter from Wayne yet.

SAF SUES DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
OVER CARRYING OF HANDGUNS


BELLEVUE, WA – The Second Amendment Foundation today filed a lawsuit on behalf of three residents of the District of Columbia and a New Hampshire resident, seeking to compel the city to issue carry permits to law-abiding citizens.

The lawsuit was filed in U.S. District Court on behalf of Tom Palmer, George Lyon and Amy McVey, all District residents, and Edward Raymond, a New Hampshire resident. SAF and the individual plaintiffs are being represented by attorney Alan Gura, who successfully argued the landmark District of Columbia v. Heller case in 2008 that overturned the District’s handgun ban on the grounds that it was unconstitutional under the Second Amendment.


Once again SAF is driving D.C. officials back to court because the anti-gun city administration refuses to abide by the law. It is beginning to appear like residents of the District are up against a rogue city government that simply does not want to ease its stranglehold on the most important civil right of all, the right of self-preservation.

“In most major American cities,” said attorney Gura, “where the right to bear arms is respected, licensed permit holders have proven themselves safe and effective. Washington, D.C. already requires handgun registrants to complete the background checks and training classes required of carry permit holders throughout the country. It is pointless to deny these individuals the right to bear arms.”

SAF previously sued the District over its restrictive handgun registration policies, leading the city to amend those policies. This time, SAF is alleging that the District previously had a city code under which the police chief could issue licenses to carry handguns to individuals, including citizens not residing in the District, though the city did not issue such licenses as a matter of policy for several years. That authority was revoked last December by the Mayor and City Council.

Plaintiffs are seeking a permanent injunction against the continued ban on carrying handguns by law-abiding citizens for personal protection.

The Second Amendment Foundation (www.saf.org) is the nation’s oldest and largest tax-exempt education, research, publishing and legal action group focusing on the Constitutional right and heritage to privately own and possess firearms. Founded in 1974, The Foundation has grown to more than 650,000 members and supporters and conducts many programs designed to better inform the public about the consequences of gun control.
 
Surely no-one is that myopic and "stoooopid.". . . .

. . . as not to notice it's a 2A & RKBA case. I got my NRA letter asking for funds on the 6th. No mention of coming alongside any group on this case. Why? Not important enough?? Let's see if we have any reasons: -- -- acting lazy, complacent, lethargic, overpaid, over-rated, overwhelmed, slow-on-the-draw, happy to serve in second place, myopic (can't see past their own statues), more an Administration than an Association, top-heavy, unresponsive, etc. But I am a Life Member, and shall remain so. What's your excuse??
 
Larger

What don't you want to understand about the difference between "The Second Amendment", and "Rifle" association?? The Bambi mind-set shows through.
 
I see no point in this thread reaching what appears to be its inevitable conclusion.

If you want to discuss this suit, feel free to start another thread, but there really is no point attacking the NRA for not commenting on a suit the very day another organization announces it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top