Hawk Tale (or news that the neo-cons and corporate media won't report on)

Status
Not open for further replies.

OpenRoad

member
Joined
Oct 27, 2004
Messages
144
http://www.breakfornews.com/

http://www.metroactive.com/papers/sonoma/02.02.05/byrne-0505.html

The Byrne Report
Hawk Tale


By Peter Byrne

ON JAN. 18, California senator Dianne Feinstein introduced Dr. Condoleezza Rice at a Senate nomination hearing for Secretary of State in terms so saccharine that molasses seemed to ooze out of her mouth. She was a precocious child, Feinstein purred. She has skill, judgment and poise. She loves football. Bush loves her. "The problems we face abroad are complex and sizable. If Dr. Rice's past performance is any indication, though, we can rest easy."

That very same day, Feinstein's husband, Richard Blum, took advantage of a spike in the price of his URS Corporation stock. He sold a third of his holdings in the defense contractor for $57 million, according to filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. With Rice confirmed, the business of death and occupation looks rosy as hell for Feinstein, who--let's get real--benefits tremendously from sharing community property with Blum.

URS' largest customer is the U.S. Army, which accounted for 17 percent ($587 million) of its cash revenue in 2004. In 2001, URS enjoyed a mere $169 million in defense contracts. Now, its war contracts total more than $2 billion. According to its annual report, the San Francisco?based URS anticipates that profits will rocket up in 2005, because "operations in the Middle East are expected to generate increased work related to the development of weapons systems, the training of military pilots and the maintenance, upgrade and repair of military vehicles." Provided, of course, that our hawkish leadership remains as poised and lovable as the new Secretary of State.

Feinstein, who sits on the Defense Appropriations Subcommittee, is an advocate of first-strike warfare, even though it flouts international law and the standards of common decency. Interestingly, her Financial Disclosure Report for 2003 was more than three times the size of her 2002 disclosure (Feinstein's 2003 disclosure numbers 133 pages, compared to Sen. Barbara Boxer's six-page report). The Feinstein-Blum portfolio is crammed with multimillion dollar investments in the military-industrial-financial complex and corporations that heavily exploit Third World peoples. The senator has a lot to lose should the neoconservative war machine falter.

Hubby holds a controlling interest in another engineering firm, Perini Corporation of Framingham, Mass. Perini ranks No. 6 by dollar amount in war-related government contracts in the Middle East. According to its annual report, "Perini proudly supports the U.S. government with global rapid response capabilities for defense, reconstruction and security." Perini builds military facilities and roads in Afghanistan, electrical infrastructure in Iraq and U.S. embassies around the world.

After the Senate, Feinstein included, approved Bush's war plans in 2002, Perini's defense contract awards soared from negligible to $2.52 billion. But, as with many of the sole-source, open-ended contracts awarded to politically connected firms, there are problems with accountability. Last summer, Department of Defense auditors determined that Perini could not adequately justify its costs in Iraq as fair and reasonable. That's government-speak for: They're gouging the #!$% out of us.

Perini is heavily engaged in military and municipal public works projects inside the United States; at least two are also under investigation for contract fraud. For example, the city of San Francisco has sued general contractor Perini--which was in a joint venture with the Tutor-Saliba construction firm--for $100 million in cost overruns at a San Francisco International Airport project. The lawsuit alleges that the joint venture engaged in "a sophisticated pattern of fraud," including inflating costs, fabricating delays and setting up minority front companies to exploit affirmative-action preferences. The attorney general of Massachusetts is looking into false claims made by a Perini joint venture in the "Big Dig" urban highway construction boondoggle in Boston.

Ron Tutor, owner of Tutor-Saliba and CEO of Perini, bought into the latter company, along with Blum, as it teetered on the edge of solvency in 2000 due to a bad real estate investment. It rebounded, thanks to the firm's sudden ability to obtain lucrative U.S. military and government contracts, which, of course, had nothing to do with the fact that Blum's powerful wife has her hands on the military's purse strings. Remarkably, Perini grossed $1.37 billion in 2003, up 27 percent from the previous year, before the U.S. invasion and occupation of Iraq.

Perini attributes its rocketing profits to "increased volume of work in Iraq and Afghanistan." As a risk factor, the firm notes that continued demand for its military services depends upon "the political situation in Iraq," which, logically, means that it desires the bloody war and useless occupation to continue indefinitely--a wish that hawktails with the foreign policy positions of Bush, Rice, Rumsfeld and Feinstein.

I almost forgot: Perini Corp. is the nation's most active builder of Indian-fronted casinos. That explains a few things about Sen. Feinstein and the politics of gambling, soon to be revealed in greater detail in this space.
 
Wait one (bleep) second. Martha Stewart spent nearly a year in jail for selling a few thousand shares of a biotech firm (which went up anyway) and Feinstein and her husband can steal billions from taxpayers and no one says a word? Where is the justice?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Are you stating that Dianne Feinstein is a neo-con, or con of any type?

Excuse me while I laugh in your face.
 
beerslurpy

while I may agree with your sentiment 100% (or I may not)
I like thr's policy of expletive deleted,especially when it concerns God.
Thank you very much.
(I've been guilty of a few slip ups on thr policy too)
 
Wait one (bleep) second. Martha Stewart spent nearly a year in jail for selling a few thousand shares of a biotech firm (which went up anyway) and Feinstein and her husband can steal billions from taxpayers and no one says a word? Where is the justice?

No, she didn't. She went to prison for lying to a federal agent. Where is the justice?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sorry, youre right. Which raises another point someone brought up here a while back, which was that a certain attorney said: "Every client of his who refused to talk wasnt convicted."

Still, there aint no justice lol geek reference.
 
Are you stating that Dianne Feinstein is a neo-con, or con of any type?

No. She's obviously an authoritarian socialist. But, they have alot in common with the neo-cons.
 
Who did martha stewart upset that was powerful? It sounds like a good explanation, but I have always wondered who it was specificially.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
just because most people don't understand "insider trading" doesn't mean it's some "victimless crime". It happens to be one of the worst non-violent crimes i can think of. it definitely deserves jail time.
 
I work in the defense industry.

Our business cycle is out of scew with the commercial industry.

While the rest of the economy was in a slump, we were doing just fine, even growing some.

When the commercial economy takes a nosedive and there's a republican in office, defence stocks are a good place to put your money.

There's plenty of good reasons to put your money in defense stocks based on publicly available information.

This article is definately written by someone with a strong point of view. I don't think that they're really trying to give us all the information about the subject, so I'm skeptical that their conclusions are based on fact.

Blum's buying into Perini and it's subsequent turnaround sounds suspicious. However, he obviously has a lot of money, and considering who he's married to he likely has a strong interest in politics. It's quite possible that he just did research on publicly available sources on what resources a company providing support in Iraq might need, and found that Perini was a good match. He then gave them the funding to be able to meet those needs. That would simple be good investing, not insider trading.

This article wreaks of the typical attack policies of extremist political groups. Smear people with a few facts and half the story. Mention ties to big businesses and corporations. Infer that the only possible connection is one of corruption.

The only thing this article really told me is that the source is not credible. Other than that, it's worthless.

"Feinstein, who sits on the Defense Appropriations Subcommittee, is an advocate of first-strike warfare, even though it flouts international law and the standards of common decency."

Liberals are so fond of mentioning this international law thing. Who passes these so called laws? What treaty did we sign to allow them power over us?

Saying that common decency prevents us from striking an opponent before they have the chance to kill Americans when they show the will to do so is absurd. Saying that international law prevents our country from doing so is equally absurd.
 
Wait one (bleep) second. Martha Stewart spent nearly a year in jail for selling a few thousand shares of a biotech firm (which went up anyway) and Feinstein and her husband can steal billions from taxpayers and no one says a word? Where is the justice?

There's pretty clear evidence that Martha Stewart broke the law. Though proving insider trading against her was dificult, there was clear evidence that she actively obstructed the investigation. She's paying a reasonable criminal penalty for that crime.

She's lost a fortune from the public backlash to her tarnishing by her own actions. That's not the fault nor the concern fo the justice department. She's suffering the effects of her own actions.

Fienstein and her hubby stole Billions from taxpayers? Where's the proof? Seriously, I'm anything but a fan of Fienstein. If there's evidence of insider trading, theft, or corruption I'd love to see them both be held accountable for it.

However, what I see here are just some malicius attacks built on a few facts and a lot of conspiracy theory type stories. Such stories mean nothing when they are used to attack republicans and mean nothing when they are used to attack Democrats.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Just as an aside...

I went to the first site posted (Breakfornews) and found it a confusing jumble of Democrat, left wing, BS!!

There were so many ads for anti-Bush this and that, I didn't even bother trying to find the article that was quoted!! :banghead:
 
Feinstein is a typical conflicted hypocritical limousine liberal, who has no business on the Defense Appropriations Committee.
 
Is it just me, or does this Mr. Byrnes' tone suggest to anyone else that his major beef with Swinestein is that she's not ENOUGH of a flaming Lefty to suit him?

If he's not carefull, his karma is liable to run over his dogma.
 
"Now kids, we're near the end of our story - gather up close here and I'll tell you the ending."

"Kids, it's all just business. Now go to bed, have happy dreams and don't worry about any of it."
 
I'm still bothered by the mention of "neo-con" in the headline here and the link with Feinstein. A neo-con is a conservative. Feinstein is anything but. So why juxtapose the two unless..... :scrutiny:
 
The "neo-cons" have proven they are not conservative.

Probably depends on your definition of conservative and neo conservative. But Feinstein is neither. So.... :scrutiny:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top