Help Me Identify This .308W ammo pls.

Status
Not open for further replies.

boneman_66

Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2009
Messages
18
Does anyone know anything about this ammo?

http://www.gunbroker.com/Auction/ViewItem.asp?Item=123616672

I stumbled across some with the identical head stamp (.308W on the top, 82 on the bottom, one "O" on each side) here locally, but the seller didn't know much about it. I'm new .308/7.62 so I don't really know what 'category' to put this in?

- is this military surplus?
- how do we know the maker and/or country of origin?
- is it corrosive?
- etc.

I think the guy was asking about $.60 a shell for it which doesn't seem like a steal, but definitely cheaper than what that auction went for (I think) and the name brand stuff.

Any help appreciated - I've got a lot to learn!

Boneman
 
berdan primed Prvi Partizan contract ammo IIRC.


got some about 2-3 years ago...and wish I got more.


edit to add...

no not corrosive...and not mil surp as its designation is 308W.

some tin-foil hats have told me that it is actually "clean" ammo used by covert ops folks in foreign countries when they are doing black-ops.

I was proud of myself and kept a straight face through it all. :)


as for performance, it ran great in my FAL and shoots very accurate in my bolt rifle. too bad its berdan. :(
 
did a little more digging around - these guys seem to think it is corrosive? in the big scheme of things is that a big deal or just a minor inconvenience (i.e. more cleaning requirements)? gun will hopefully be a m1a scout if/when i can find one. does $.60/shell seem fair?

http://forums.gunboards.com/showthread.php?p=600281
 
Last edited:
as I stated, the stuff in that auction was the same I had. shot both through a gas gun (FAL) and a bolt rifle and no corrosive effects noted by me.

Get what you want bro.

But I would rather go with the Winchester as it is reloadable boxer brass.
 
I am most likely preaching to the choir here, but for safety's sake I will mention this.

I do not think this is .308 ammo. this is 7.62X51 ammo, and there is a significant difference.

As I understand it, you can fire .308 ammo from a 7.62X51 rifle but it is dangerous to fire 7.62X51 from a .308 rifle.

Bash away if I am incorrect, but I just wanted to make sure boneman 66 knows the difference.
 
got it opposite lesterg3,

7.62 is a bit lower pressure than 308.

Most folks don't have a problem with using one in the other as most factory 308 ammo (except the Hornady Light Mag) is loaded a bit under SAAMI max pressures.


This is my understanding of it as I have read and learned from the good folks around here some and mostly on the FAL files board.

YMMV
D
 
Yeah, your right I got it a--backwards, but still I felt like I needed to say something, because I can't be sure that everyone knows the difence, and I am sorry if everyone here does know, just want everyone to be safe. :)

Here is an exerpt I borrowed from the Gun Zone.

.308 Win. and 7.62mm NATO Are Not Identical

At distressingly frequent intervals, someone can always be counted on to pop up on an Internet Forum somewhere and ask Is the .308 Win round different than 7.62x51 NATO?. There follows a deluge of responses explaining with different degrees of success, this well-documented issue. So let this serve as a "mini-FAQ" on the subject.
The .308 Winchester and the 7.62mm NATO (nee T-65) cartridges are not the same1, nor should they be considered interchangeable despite apparently identical external dimensions… the chamber drawings are in fact different.

But as Clint McKee and Walter Kuleck of Fulton Armory note on their "award-winning" website: They are the same, 'cause nobody makes 7.62mm (NATO) ammo that isn't to the .308 "headspace" dimension spec. So 7.62mm ammo fits nicely into .308 chambers, as a rule. While the 7.62mm NATO cartridge has a maximum chamber pressure of approximately 50,000 pounds per square inch (psi), in the SAAMI book the .308 Winchester has a MAP (maximum average product) pressure of approximately 62,000 psi* (each by conformal transducer measurements, and therefore comparable). This is not to say that all .308 Winchester loads will develop such pressures, merely that they would be within manufacturing tolerances if they did so. Firing .308 Winchester ammunition in a firearm specifically chambered for the 7.62mm NATO risks damage to the firearm and injury to the shooter.

This translates to approximately 52,000 cup (Copper Units of Pressure).
Chamber Headspace Gauges
.308 Winchester
GO: 1.630"
NOGO: 1.634"
FIELD REJECT: 1.638" 7.62 x 51mm NATO
GO: 1.635"

FIELD REJECT: 1.6455"
Chamber Pressures
.308 Winchester
MAP: 62,000 psi
MPSM: 66,000 psi
Minimum Proof Pressure: 83,000 psi
Maximum Proof Pressure: 89,000 psi 7.62 x 51mm NATO
Maximum: 50,000 psi

Proof pressure: 67,500 psi
Sources: .308 Winchester data from ANSI/SAAMI document Z299.4-1992, Pressure and Velocity, Center fire Rifle Sporting Ammunition

7.62 x 51mm NATO headspace data from Jerry Kuhnhausen's M1/M1A shop manual.

Pressure data from TM 43-001-27: Army Ammunition Data Sheets Small Caliber Ammunition. According to Ken at Clymer Tools, noted maker of headspace gauges, the problem isn't the round itself, it's the headspacing.

A 7.62 NATO Go gauge is .003-inch longer than a .308 Winchester Go gauge. The 7.62 NATO NoGo is also longer, to the tune of .004-inch. It's entirely possible to chamber and have an accident with a .308 Winchester round in a rifle that would be safe for 7.62 X 51mm. A chamber in 7.62 that could barely close on a 7.62 NoGo could swallow a .308 Field gauge. Add to this the fact that .308 Winchester brass, being of commercial manufacture, is much thinner than that of the 7.62 NATO, and expands a lot more, could possibly lead to case head separation.

And just when we thought that we had this 7.62mm NATO stuff down pretty pat, along comes Adam Firestone at Cruffler.com with his taste for the arcane, who makes a compelling brief that much of what many thought they "knew," was all wrong! An excerpt:

Many shooters are aware of the differences between the dimensionally similar 7.62mm NATO cartridge and the .308 Winchester. What most are not aware of is that all cartridges called "7.62mm NATO" are not created equal, and that there is significant variation, both dimensionally and ballistically, between 7.62mm NATO cartridges as manufactured by different countries, and even between such cartridges as manufactured by different arsenals within the same country. As a result, the terms "NATO spec" or "NATO standard," which imply that all "NATO" cartridges are the same or to indicate the fitness of given 7.62x51mm ammunition for a specific use, are misleading.
 
Yes - I was aware of that - thanks.

And talk about putting the cart before the horse - here I am buying .308/7.62 ammo and I don't even have a gun yet :) Hopefully an m1a scout will find its way to me soon!
 
The ammo in question is SB corrosive ammo.

Also .70 a round for that stuff is quite stupid.:scrutiny:
Much better, newer, boxer primed ammo can be had for less than that if you look around.
 
Boneman 66

I did not post this just for you. But, truthfully I have know idea what your competence level is, that's not a slam just the truth, and you can see that throughout the threads that are posted, we really do not know each other, and sometimes it is difficult (especially for old timers like me) to remember each persons past posts and apparent knowledge about firearms, hunting, and reloading. :)

I posted what I did because there are a lot of folks that read the threads and do not respond so we have no idea what they assume from the posting. I only wanted everyone who was not aware of the difference to be informed.

I humbly ask forgiveness if I offended anyone. :uhoh:
 
No offense taken :) Anyone who takes time to post on these boards and shares their knowledge is providing a valuable service indeed.
 
You don't happen to be in the Akron, Ohio area do you?

Three hours ago I literally just bought some .308 with the exact same headstamp!

I was coming here to research what I ended up with, and one of the very first threads I see on THR is one with the exact question I was coming to answer :what::what:
 
No - Northern VT, but that's funny. Gotta love the internet and people's willingness to help complete strangers - kinda restores your faith in mankind :)

As as the subject of the ammo, I pretty much decided that it was not really worth the cost (I paid something like $11.50 per box of 20) when I could get what I'm guessing is mid grade, non-corrosive commercial ammo like this for a similar price:

http://www.winchester.com/products/catalog/cfrdetail.aspx?symbol=USA3081&cart=MzA4IFdpbmNoZXN0ZXI=

Let me know how it shoots though - it might be a while before I find the gun I plan to try it out on (m1A scout) :(
 
The best thing to do is contact the manufacturer. Usually the newer rifles use 308 or 7.62 ammo. Check wikipedia as well. The cartridges are the same except some 7.62 has a slightly thicker brass casing. This difference develops a slightly small volume in the 7.62x51mm ammo. DPMS told me to shoot any new manufactured .308 winchester or 7.62x51mm ammo in my Panther 308 AP4. Like I said, contact the manufacturer of your rifle to get the correct answer. If you like to live in a state of confusion keep asking questions on the net and you will get several opinions for each question.
 
Powermad's post seems to have gone unnoticed.
The ammo in question is Czech milsurp/export surplus. It is in-fact Berdan AND corrosive.

And just to pile on...7.62x51 and .308W are the exact same cartridge and 100% interchangeable. The only concern is that military cases have thicker brass and less internal capacity. This can be a problem when trying to reload a hot .308W load into a military 7.62 case.
 
Last edited:
While the 7.62mm NATO cartridge has a maximum chamber pressure of approximately 50,000 pounds per square inch (psi), in the SAAMI book the .308 Winchester has a MAP (maximum average product) pressure of approximately 62,000 psi*(each by conformal transducer measurements, and therefore comparable).

The latter part is not the case.
The mil-spec is still based on a crusher gauge calibrated in pounds per square inch. The US Army and NATO are not SAAMI members and do not use the term "CUP" for crusher gauge readings. Most commercial loaders have gone over to the piezoelectric transducer which gives a higher number for the same loading.
If .308 Win was really loaded 20%+ hotter, don't you think they would advertise substantially higher velocity?

When the caliber came out, the .308 was rated at 52,000 CUP, the 7.62 at 50,000 psi in a crusher gauge barrel so calibrated; they just don't use the term CUP. Per NRA, 1981.

The real limit to compatibility is the sloppy military chamber meant for hot dirty automatic weapons shooting crap ammunition scrounged from our allies.
 
So I woke up today, made coffee and checked the mail.
Got a SG flyer thing in the mail. Toss it on the table and have a few cups.
Business as usual and I grab the flyer and head to the can.
It's a slow dropper and I'm just flipping through the pages looking at their stuff when I ran across an ad for S&B ammo. I started laughing so hard the turd shot out and splashed me. Ok so that pegs the overshare meter..

Potent plinking power
Rare find! We tracked down a very limited supply of this popular .308 ammo
So I recommend you jump on this sweet buying opportunity right now.
Brass cased,corrosive,Berdan primed, non re-loadable. 60 rnds...$29.97

:scrutiny:
 
The days of spending $400 for .308 shipped and taking 5 minutes to help the UPS guy unload and pack it in is over.

I only have a few packs of Port left and ran through the curry long ago.
There is a local outfit that is selling reloaded .308/7.62x51 using once fired LC brass loaded to NATO specs for .50 a round. Not cheap anymore.
Walmart wanted $32 for 40 rounds of the Rem UMC green box the last time I was in there.
 
It occurs to me that the gun companies think the era of cheap surplus centerifire plinking ammo is over. Look at the .22 wannabes that are coming out, the GSG H&K oid and the fake ARs from Colt and S&W, with more said to be in the works.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top