larueminati
Member
- Joined
- Oct 25, 2017
- Messages
- 58
According to my kitchen scales it weighs 7lb 11oz with a Leupold scope base, warne rings, and a Nikon buck master 4.5-14x40.
Thanks for taking the time to weigh it, I appreciate it.
According to my kitchen scales it weighs 7lb 11oz with a Leupold scope base, warne rings, and a Nikon buck master 4.5-14x40.
Im looking to pick up a lightweight rifle and have narrowed my choices down to 3 but need some help deciding.
The 3 I have narrowed it down to are
Kimber 84M hunter
Savage lightweight hunter
Tikka t3 lite
Give me your choice and reasoning as to why
Thanks
I've owned Remington, Savage and Winchester rifles. My favorites are Remington and Winchester. I have to ask, why haven't you considered a Winchester Featherweight? It isn't the lightest but it has a good balance. I have one in .243 and think it's great.
What you say about the NULA is true, and I agree with your comparisons. But on the other hand consider this: the NULA will be considerably more accurate than any of the brands/models you list regardless of whatever scope you put on them. And at the end of the final hunting seasons, whenever that comes, and it's time to sell, the NULA will be more valuable, and sell for more than all the rifles-and scopes- you list...combined!Really? Isn't it kind of obvious based on the list below that @glockky had a budget that didn't allow for a $3,500 rifle and a two year wait! Heck, you could have a scoped version of each of the OP's suggestions and still be under the cost of one NULA rifle.
Kimber 84M hunter
Savage lightweight hunter
Tikka t3 lite
Or just buy a Tikka
What you say about the NULA is true, and I agree with your comparisons. But on the other hand consider this: the NULA will be considerably more accurate than any of the brands/models you list regardless of whatever scope you put on them. And at the end of the final hunting seasons, whenever that comes, and it's time to sell, the NULA will be more valuable, and sell for more than all the rifles-and scopes- you list...combined!
I don't own a Tikka but my friend has a 308 he bought a few years ago. I've shot it some and it's a really nice rifle. I considered buying one but ended up buying another Howa. People stear clear of Howa's because they aren't well know and they don't advertise very much. Out of the box accuracy is as good as any Savage or Tikka tho. Both of mine are 1 MOA with my ammo. I was shooting with a guy last week with a Howa Mini #2 in a chassis and he was probably 1/2 MOA when he got it dialed in. 6.5 Grendel hand loads.
When I saw that I immediately wanted to put my HBAR in a chassis but I probably can't shoot that well with any rifle. There's always a point of diminishing return.
II think there may be a 6.5 Grendel Howa Mini in my future.
I know Randy Newberg has promoted Howa's on his show.
I don't think you can go wrong with the wood stocked LWH in .308. That's a lifetime gun in my opinion.99% sure i'm going with the savage 11/LWH in 308, I want the wood stock not a tupperware. I'll report back with what I think about it, buds has them in stock.
If it was a gun I planed on bench shooting the gun alot i'd get the tikka and sacrifice the extra weight that comes with it, actions are super nice. This is strictly hunting rifle.
It sounds as if you are saying the ULA is nothing more than an expensive Remington...I have model 24 build 1989 and all he did was redesign Rem short action smaller in size,.open magazine well to handle 30-06 case.
Yea, I meant the Mini. If I were to get a Howa, it would be for the 6.5 Grendel.
Offfhand said:What you say about the NULA is true, and I agree with your comparisons. But on the other hand consider this: the NULA will be considerably more accurate than any of the brands/models you list regardless of whatever scope you put on them. And at the end of the final hunting seasons, whenever that comes, and it's time to sell, the NULA will be more valuable, and sell for more than all the rifles-and scopes- you list...combined!
Because, sometimes folks think about what the "extra money" will buy them and save longer, to buy quality instead... Me included, when Mel "showed me" he could build me the 22 rifle I had always dreamed of owning...the OP had a budget that didn't allow for a $3,500 rifle so why are we still talking about this?
Because, sometimes folks think about what the "extra money" will buy them and save longer, to buy quality instead... Me included