Help out a fellow CWP holder! Legal fees....

Status
Not open for further replies.

ScottsGT

Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2002
Messages
1,987
Location
Columbia, SC
Please take the time to read this and if you can, send a donation. This happened reigh around the corner from where I work.

http://www.scfirearms.org/

What would you do...?
Imagine you're standing outside your locked apartment building on the welcome mat under the awning. Suddenly two drunken men about 20 yards away decide they are going to beat you up. They charge you while yelling vulgar threats of how they are going to "beat your ass."
At first, you can't believe this is really happening. Then, you realize it is indeed happening. Unfortunately, those couple of moments of disbelief have allowed the two drunks to close the distance. Now, they are only 10 yards away from you, still charging, and still cursing and threatening you.
You are a disabled Army veteran. You served in Korea, Mogadishu in Somalia, and Egypt in Desert Storm. But, nothing has prepared you for something like this. Your 30% Army service disability is due to nerve damage in your right leg, which causes foot drop. So, you can't outrun these two aggressive drunks, and you can't hope to win a fight against two healthy young men either. But, even though you have done nothing to provoke them, they aren't giving you a choice on whether there is going to be a fight or not.
These two mean drunks are the ones initiating and forcing a violent encounter. They are predators, and you are now their prey.


You are more afraid now than you have ever been in your entire life. You know these mean drunks are going to cause you serious bodily injury or death because they are still charging and still yelling vulgar threats of how they are going to "beat your ass." You realize you are in a real life nightmare.

These mean drunks are now only 15 feet away. You pull your handgun most of the way out of your pocket and show these two drunks you are armed in an attempt to get them to stop their attack. You raise your left hand and tell them to stop. They both stop.
You feel a moment of relief, but only a moment. Suddenly, the lead drunk yells “I got something for you too”, reaches inside his shirt, and charges straight at you.
You don’t know what is under this drunk’s shirt - it could be a knife, a razor, a gun, a club, whatever. But, what you do know is that even after seeing you are armed, this drunk is still charging at you with the intent to do you great bodily harm. Even if he is lying and has nothing under his shirt, he is still big enough to take your gun away from you and use it on you if he gets his hands on it. And, there is still the second drunk only 15 feet away who is ready, willing, and able to help his buddy once you are disarmed.
You have a choice to make. Do you let this drunk get a hold of you and your gun and let him and his accomplice do what they have been saying they are going to do to you, or worse? Or, do you shoot the drunk who is almost upon you now and stop the threat to your life?
The drunk is only 6 feet away when you quickly pull the trigger three times to save your life. As the drunk is falling down, he drops the vodka bottle that he was reaching for under his shirt. The other drunk comes to the aid of his friend. You call 911.
The above real life scenario happened to Jason Dickey on April 29, 2004, in Columbia, SC. Somehow, the prosecutor decided the “evil” that needed to be punished was Jason, not the two mean drunks attacking a disabled innocent man. Now, Jason needs your help.
It was obvious at trial the real “evil” the prosecutor was going after was the South Carolina Concealed Weapon Permit (CWP) program. The prosecutor repeatedly stated that if Jason had not had a CWP, then the dead man would still be alive. What the prosecutor failed to mention is what condition Jason would have been in had he not been able to defend himself against two mean aggressive drunks bent on doing great bodily harm to an innocent person.
Every CWP holder needs to realize Jason’s trial is only the beginning of the war on CWP holders in SC. There is a saying that “all’s fair in love and war”, and the truth is one of the first casualties in war.
In this war on the CWP program, the prosecutor did a few things any self respecting person would not have done. For example, the prosecutor objected to allowing a SLED investigative report to be used at trial because it would have helped to clear Jason. Unfortunately, Jason’s attorney had failed to lay the proper foundation for introducing the SLED investigative report into evidence, and thus the SLED investigative report was not allowed to be used to clear Jason once the prosecutor objected. When was the last time you heard of a prosecutor so bent on convicting an innocent man that he would keep reliable evidence out that would help clear an innocent man? Obviously, the truth was not as important as winning the war against the CWP program. This was not the only despicable thing done by the prosecutor to convict an innocent man. To read about all of the despicable things the prosecutor did, please read the full account of the trial.
Jason was convicted of manslaughter in a flawed trial, and sentenced on September 18, 2006, to 16 years in prison. This is a travesty of justice, and it is a threat to every CWP holder in SC. To see just how wrong this decision was, please read the full account of what happened at trial.
Ask yourself what you would have done in the same situation. If you would have pulled the trigger too, then Jason and the very existence of the CWP program need your help.

Two things need to be done ASAP:
1. Get Jason out of prison and clear his good name. Click here to see how.
2. Change the law of self defense to protect innocent victims, not violent predators. Click here to see how.

Click here to read the full account of what happened at Jason Dickey’s trial.
 
we need to push for stand your ground laws too

As well as help this guy out, his lawyer should be paying for the bulk of the appeal too.
 
Yea that sucks.. I probably woulda ran in the house, locked the door, and called the cops.

20 yards=60 feet. Can you get your keys out of your pocket, find the key, insert it correctly, and turn the knob, and hobble in on your lame foot before they get there?
 
When was the last time you heard of a prosecutor so bent on convicting an innocent man that he would keep reliable evidence out that would help clear an innocent man?

Mike Nifong, who is currently under scrutiny by the NC bar assoc.

Sounds like this fellow needs the same.
 
Isn't this the case where the guy was working as SECURITY for the appartment building? It was an UNARMED security job, but he carried a CCW anyway? And didn't the guy FOLLOW the drunks and ended up shooting one at the ENTRANCE to the building, not outside his appartment?

I don't necessarily think it was a bad shoot (I wasn't at the trial, have not seen a transcript either), but I don't buy off on a lot of what was being said in his defense.
 
20 yards=60 feet. Can you get your keys out of your pocket, find the key, insert it correctly, and turn the knob, and hobble in on your lame foot before they get there?

I think so .. I dunno.

The description of the incident is kinda confusing. It sounds like the shooter was standing on his porch outside of his apt. That means he couldnt have been more than a couple yards from his own door. Even with a gimped foot, I'd imagine it wouldnt be too hard to get back inside.

EDIT: Nevermind.. read the other thread.. didnt realize the shooter was actually a security guard.
 
Hired as an unarmed security guard or not, he has the right to protect himself. Maybe just because he isn't "showing" a weapon as part of his official gear, every human has the right to protect his life. He didn't pull his weapon as part of his job dutys to "scare off" the drunks or to detain them. He did it after his life was threatned, or at least he had fear of losing his life.
 
When was the last time you heard of a prosecutor so bent on convicting an innocent man that he would keep reliable evidence out that would help clear an innocent man? Obviously, the truth was not as important as winning the war against the CWP program.

Unfortunately, this is becoming increasingly common. The prosecutor can then brag about his 99% conviction rate, which, of course, presumes that 100% of the people he tries are indeed guilty (which is highly unlikely). The truth hasn't mattered in the court room for a long time. It's what you can "prove" (if you can call it that).

It sickens me that beyond a reasonable doubt they found this poor guy guilty. This is why crime rates are high. Why not commit a crime b/c odds are the DA will somehow prosecute the innocent if you get hurt, and if you don't, then you succeed in your crime. Win-win for the criminals.

I hate our legal system.
 
When was the last time you heard of a prosecutor so bent on convicting an innocent man that he would keep reliable evidence out that would help clear an innocent man? Obviously, the truth was not as important as winning the war against the CWP program.


It has nothing to do with concealed carry. Some prosecutors believe their job (or their hobby) is to convict anyone whose case gets sent in, others are trying to send a political message (i.e. I'm tough on crime and/or help out the underprivileged so elect me) and some have political axes of their own to grind.
 
I heard about this when it first happened and just found out the verdict at the gun show here in Charleston over the weekend. I gave all of the cash I had on hand (only $33, I was just looking) to support his defense. I encourage everyone to give as this case will decide precedent in SC.

java
 
If you shop for the right jury you can get just about any verdict you want. Especially when the judge lets you suppress evidence that may aid the defense.
 
If you shop for the right jury you can get just about any verdict you want. Especially when the judge lets you suppress evidence that may aid the defense.

You have that backwards my friend.......
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top