Hickock VS Dave Tutt-Less BS than you might guess.

Status
Not open for further replies.

mec

Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2002
Messages
4,588
been checking out versions of the story and comparing notes with Gatofeo ref: the unusually well-document Hickock-Tutt walkdown of 1865. It is frequently cited as the classic mainstreet, high noon, western gunfight and sometimes as an example of Hickock's virtuosity with a revolver. It certainly went far toward advancing Hickock's reputation as a Great American and a peach of a fine lad.

The story goes that J.B. Hickock and Dave Tutt arrived in Springfield Mo. right after the war having fought on opposit sides. They enjoyed pretty much the same things including gambling, drinking and fooling around with the same woman- something that might have cause a bit of ructure in their friendship. In any case a sort of rivalry developed and one night Dave cleaned Hickock out in a card game. He wound up with Hickocks Waltham repeater watch as surity and when JB asked him not to flaunt it around, Dave just laughted at him. He then told him Not to flaunt it around or he (JB) would blow his (DT's ass off- or words to that effect.

Sure enough, early the next morning both parties showed up in the Springfield town square to see what would happen. Dave showed up fingering the watch and JB got wind of it. Both of them stepped into the street and a later-measured 75 yards and cut loose. Apparently Dave took the classic NRA target stance, side on to JB while Hickock braced his revolver in two hands. The guns went bang at about the same instant and Tutt spun around saying " I am killed" just before falling out kaput.
At this point the story becomes a bit controversial. Most reports have Hickock using a .36 navy and one contemporary account has him already wearing the two reversed navies in a sash at the time he reached Springfield. The same story tellher has him going to meet Tutt with a Colt Dragoon, Another version said he was using a .44 1960 Army revolver. What ever he was using, the three revolvers seem capable of about the same degree of accuracy.

tutt.jpg


We find that hitting a man sized target from two hands, standing at 75 yards is no particular feat. It does require a bit of luck to land a single shot in the heart at that distance. Gatofeo lives in the desert and has racked up a considerable proportion of hits on man-sized targets at much greater distance.

I was surprised at the flatness of trajectory of the 81 grain ball over 22 grains/vol of pyrodex p. This clocks a bit over 1,000 fps and the revolver shoots dead on at 25 yards. At 75 yards it is only 4-6 Inches under point of aim.
 
Last edited:
Without question, it was Col. George Ward Nichols' account of the gunfight in "Harper's New Monthly Magazine" for February 1867 that made Hickok a national figure. I have one of the original copies (not a reprint) and the complete story goes into more detail then the excerpts that are usually printed - both about the fight and other stories concerning Hickok's marksmanship.

However Nichol's version is questionable because he admits that he wasn't there, didn't witness the fight, and everything is based on what he was told by others. (Or perhaps what he made up).

The distance between the two has been described as anywhere from 50 yards to 100. During the 1850's Colt advertised that his (saddle) holster revolvers - read that to mean a Dragoon - were more accurate at 200 yards then the "common musket."

Be that as it may, Wild Bill showed on a number of occasions before reliable witnesses that he could shoot, and shoot well. Unquestionably he did nail Dave Tutt, and with one shot. On these two points all accounts agree.
 
Handguns of that era tended to be sighted for longer ranges than today. A 75 yard factory zero was common for Colt revolvers. Charges used by shooters varied wildly, so that factory zero was only with one particualr type of projectile and a specified charge.

Hickok was also noteworthy in that he tended to practice frequently. That would improve the odds somewhat.
 
I used to have one of the Colt Walker reproductions.

That thing would let you shoot a pie plate at 100 yards with no problem. Over and over.

A .457 inch lead ball over 50 grains of ffg really got the ball moving.
 
I gave it a shot with a Dragoon this morning. Now, I have fired 18 shots at the tutt target and made 15 solid torso hits. Not too difficult with an accurate revolver.

The load is 45 gr/vol pyrodex p and a .457 ball. The gun hits a few inches high and right at 60 feet and continues to do so at 75 yards
 
Last edited:
Mike I saw your pictures

Mike,
Thats one of the first times I have seen you with both hands on a revolver, ANY revolver from a .500 Linebaugh at full tilt to a .22 LR.
 
I had to do it to be like Hickock. Besides, the wind was going about 20 mph
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top