Hillary Clinton To Support Bush Court Nominee

Status
Not open for further replies.

rick_reno

member
Joined
Dec 25, 2002
Messages
3,027
This tells me everything I need to know about Bush and his nominee, Judge Roberts.

http://www.drudgereport.com/flash3hcr.htm

HILLARY CLINTON TO SUPPORT BUSH COURT NOMINEE

**Exclusive**

Senator Hillary Clinton has confided to associates that she intends to vote FOR Bush Supreme Court nominee John Roberts, the DRUDGE REPORT has learned.

Unless some unforeseen development occurs around Roberts, Clinton will throw her support behind confirmation, says a top source.

"Look, we're not thrilled President Bush is in office and gets to make these choices," said a top Hillary source, "but we have to make the best of the situation until the next election!"

With her support of Roberts, Clinton ignores pressure from the reactionary-activist wing of the Democrat party.

"She is simply doing what is right for the country, not MOVEON.ORG," the Clinton insider explained.

Developing...
 
Ha Klintoon is trying to portray herself as a moderate for a 2008 run.
 
This tells me everything I need to know about Bush and his nominee, Judge Roberts


Like what?

Even Sheets Byrd is going to vote for the guy.

And Joe Lieberman
 
Why would Byrd vote against him, he isn't a "race mongrel". As much as I'd love to have a strongly pro-RKBA dem nominee in 08, so that the two parties could fight over who's more pro-RKBA, it isn't gonna happen. Having Hillary nominated and suffer a humiliating loss in the general election is a close second. GO HILLARY!
 
She wants to run in 08 and she knows the (liberal) Democrats can't stop it. She would be an idiot if she didn't vote for him. It says nothing about Roberts and proves once again she'll pay any price to get were she wants to go.
 
She wants to run in 08 and she knows the (liberal) Democrats can't stop it. She would be an idiot if she didn't vote for him. It says nothing about Roberts and proves once again she'll pay any price to get were she wants to go.

Yup! God help us
 
Dont discount Hillary guys. She is very capable and very intelligent. Her only failing is her lack of compassion and her lack of ability to relate well to others. She is very good at rubbing people the wrong way.

This wasnt a problem in the past with Bill stumping for her. If she runs in 08, expect Bill to do 90 percent of the speaking on her behalf. You will come to know why she didnt get a divorce if you havent already.

If Bill Clinton ran for president again, do you think he would win or lose? And how hard do you think it will be to make a Hillary Candidacy look like you are really voting for Bill? It will be like Bill running again only without any of the political baggage that an actual candidacy would bring. Hillary isnt widely blamed for Chinagate, Semengate or VinceFosterGate.

Note that I still think she will lose as long as everyone isnt asleep at the wheel. My money is on Karl "Turd Burglar" Rove.
 
The press has been very busy circulating memo's that Roberts wrote during his various tenures in Republican administrations. For the most part, he seems to be a pretty solid originalist.

I really suspect that GW put Roberts forth as the first nominee, expecting a Democrat filibuster, and that GW & Co. could then use the backlash of public opinion later, when GW would nominate someone like Janice Rogers Brown to fill Rehnquist's seat.

And it may well be that Schumer and his crowd saw this, and decided to hold their fire.
 
It's simple really. It's a fight that even the liberal/left knows it can't win, and they have a lot more to lose fighting it then just letting it slide.

Wait until the next seat opens up, now that will be a lot more interesting.
 
I am hoping that Ginsburg retires soon. With Rehnquist in a pre-retirement holding pattern, the libs would go nuts.

I predict that if the Republicans take the White House again (let us pray) that Ginsburg at the least will step down. Rehnquist will not make it past this presidency.
 
You ever see that movie, "Weekend at Bernie's"? I think the Democrats are doing that with Rehnquist.
 
hillary could well be our next president. She's pretty cagey and knows how to play politics.
 
Hillary is like Arafat used to be; saying different things in different languages.
When she is speaking lefty she tells her faithful that Roberts is going to destroy everything they have worked for and he is disgusting. When she is speaking English she tells everyone those moderate things they all want to hear so they can vote for her in 08.

The latest tactic against Roberts by the left seems to be to say what a great guy he is and how they are going to vote for him. Because they know they can't stop him they are trying to spoil it all for the right.

If you have any doubts about Roberts then read this NY Sun article:
http://www.nysun.com/article/17462

Money quote from Roberts:
"The generally accepted notion that the court can only hear roughly 150 cases each term gives the same sense of reassurance as the adjournment of the court in July, when we know the Constitution is safe for the summer,"

Dayum, he sounds like one of you guys!

G
 
The Gang of 14

7 Republicans:

* John McCain, Arizona
* Lindsey Graham, South Carolina
* John Warner, Virginia
* Olympia Snowe, Maine
* Susan Collins, Maine
* Mike DeWine, Ohio
* Lincoln Chafee, Rhode Island

7 Democrats:

* Joe Lieberman, Connecticut
* Robert Byrd, West Virginia
* Ben Nelson, Nebraska
* Mary Landrieu, Louisiana
* Daniel Inouye, Hawaii
* Mark Pryor, Arkansas
* Ken Salazar, Colorado

McCain, Warner, and Bryd have indicated that any notion of a filibuster will not be successful, i.e. they favor the nominee at this point and will make a successful cloture vote possible.

I think all Clinton is doing is avoiding the obstructionist label and actually distancing herself from the Chuck Schumer show, perhaps even attempting to stick a pin in his balloon.
 
Hillary is running a sweep to the right. Endorsing Roberts is a no brainer. It establishes her credentials as a right winger. She can withdraw support later when Schumer at al have finished the proctology exam on Roberts. She could easily be setting Roberts for a harder fall when he does fall.

She could also be setting the stage for a last stand against the next SCOTUS nomination. Give Bush one judge then call in final protective fire on the next one.

Hillary will behave quite consistently. She will do whatever it takes to promote herself. If she has to doublecross her own supporters, so be it. If she has to act like David Copperfield and vanish her marxist record, so be it. If she thinks it is necessary for her to become a slobbering right winger, she will. She has no principal other than power and its accumulation to her control.

Watch for Hillary to become a raving anti-illegal immigrant advocate. She will learn sooner than republicans there is more votes to get gathered there than by sucking up to the criminal alien vote.
 
Here's why Hillary is endorsing Roberts.


http://news.yahoo.com/s/krwashbureau/20050725/ts_krwashbureau/_bc_hillary_wa_1

COLUMBUS, Ohio - Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton courted a moderate image on Monday, urging a truce between the liberal and centrist wings of her Democratic Party and a platform that bridges differences as she positions herself for a possible bid for the presidency.


Delivering a broad overview of public affairs that illustrated how she would lead the party, Clinton blended the rhetoric of President Bush in stressing an aggressive war on terrorism with the kind of talk her husband used in forging middle-ground consensus on divisive issues such as abortion and the role of faith in public life.

Clinton's venue was the annual conference of the Democratic Leadership Council, the same centrist group of Democratic Party leaders and activists that helped launch her husband's 1992 presidential campaign and where she accepted the chairmanship of a yearlong effort to write a new party agenda.

She didn't mention ambitions beyond her 2006 re-election as New York's junior senator.

But to the audience of rank-and-file Democrats, there was no doubt that she's the biggest star in the party and the likely front-runner for its 2008 nomination should she seek it.

"I'd love for her to be president," said Elizabeth Kennedy Lawlor, a Democrat from Alabama who waited eagerly after the speech for Clinton to autograph her latest book, "Living History." "She's a fighter. She's a survivor."

Ever since she won election to the Senate in 2000, Clinton has been striving to establish her moderate or centrist credentials. It's an apparent effort to overcome her reputation as an orthodox liberal. Like everyone else at the meeting of party centrists, Clinton is keenly aware that the only two Democrats to win the presidency in the last 35 years have been moderate Southerners - one of them her husband, Bill Clinton, and the other a former governor of Georgia, Jimmy Carter.

In her speech, Clinton sought to place herself astride the divisions in her party and the country.

"All too often we have allowed ourselves to be split between left, right and center," she said of Democrats. "It's high time for a cease-fire." Echoing one of her husband's favorite lines, she said Democrats should stop "accepting the false logic of false choices that keep our party and our country divided."

Instead, she said, Democrats need to convince the country that Americans can expand health care while being fiscally responsible, fight terrorism while strengthening international alliances and support free trade while protecting American workers.

Taking on one of the most emotional schisms, she said Democrats need to support abortion rights while also using such tools as family planning and eased adoptions to reduce the number of unwanted pregnancies and abortions. She has called for "common ground" on abortion, though she hasn't wavered in her support of universal abortion rights.

She referred to faith in God, shared values and a desire to "protect our children from the excesses of the popular culture."

Such emphasis on values more often associated with political conservatives than liberals isn't new for Clinton. She's been a consistent supporter of the military, particularly since the 2001 terrorist attacks. A member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, she backed the war in Iraq and has refused to push for early withdrawal. A potential rival, Sen. Evan Bayh (news, bio, voting record) of Indiana, joked Monday that he's seen her reading Soldier of Fortune magazine.

Her efforts to find middle ground have accelerated since liberal Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts was defeated in last year's presidential election.

Most notably, she's working to overcome broad criticism of her failure when she led the Clinton White House's 1993-94 effort to expand health care. Recently she even has been partnering with former Republican House Speaker Newt Gingrich - who fought her husband on virtually everything - on proposals to use technology to save money in health care.

Several potential rivals for the 2008 presidential nomination also courted party moderates at the session, including Bayh and Govs. Tom Vilsack of Iowa and Mark Warner of Virginia. All were well received.

But it was Clinton who drew the most interest and the most emotional responses.

" Hillary Clinton would be an extraordinary president," said Sandra Frankel, a town supervisor in Brighton, N.Y. "I think she'll win."

Frankel said Clinton has the "toughness" necessary to run and govern in a post-Sept. 11, 2001, world, likening her to such other strong leaders as Margaret Thatcher of Great Britain, Indira Gandhi of India and Golda Meir of Israel.

Not everyone present was so enthusiastic.

"She's certainly the big dog in the field, but I don't want her to run in '08," said Pat Vance, an alderman from Waterbury, Conn. "She's too divisive." He said he wants the party to go with a centrist such as Warner, a pro-business Democrat who successfully wooed rural voters.

Ann Mah, a state representative from Kansas, said Clinton could make inroads into Republican "red" states such as Missouri and Ohio if she stresses national security and reframes the debate on such divisive issues as abortion.

"If she takes a moderate path, she could do well," Mah said.

How about in her home state of Kansas?

"Oh no. We're pretty red out there."
 
Beerslurpy wrote:

"Her only failing is her lack of compassion and her lack of ability to relate well to others. She is very good at rubbing people the wrong way. "


In a presidential campaign, having these as your "only" weaknesses is sort of like being a NFL QB with no legs, or a SWAT sniper with no eyes, or a massage therapist with no hands, or a professional singer with no vocal chords.

I hope the Dems nominate Hillary with almost no debate at all.

She'll make Dukakis look like a political genius. She'll make Mondale look like a decent campaigner.

Even Dukakis got elected to office in an elitist liberal enclave like Massachuesetts.

Hillary had to travel all the way to NY to find a place where she could actually get elected to something.

With Hillary as the nominee, none of the red states will flip blue, and at least two of the currently blue states will flip red.

hillbilly
 
She still has a husband that is very good at those things. He will speak for her as often as other people speak for president bush now.

Traditionally Hillary takes care of the plumbing of getting Bill elected and bill presses the flesh and gives earnest sounding speeches. They did this when he ran for office and they will do it when she runs for president.
 
Hilary

My feelings on Hilary....

For a year now, Democrats have SCREAMED "bring the troops home" for one reason. Americans ARE NOT ready for a war-time president that is a female.

If we still have troops in Irad in 2008, Hilary will not win.

my 2 cents.

Michael
 
I think underestimating and marginalizing Hillary as a candidate will be the fatal mistake of the Republican party.

She will do at least as well as Kerry. There is no state Kerry took that she could not also take. All she has to do is pick up one new state, and she is in.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top