W.E.G.
Member
HK and CETME - fluted chamber - case head separations?
I've heard it suggested that "commercial" ammo is prone to case head separation failures in HK and CETME chambers.
I've also heard it suggested that reloaded ammo is more likely to separate in HK and CETME chambers.
Anybody have any experience with this?
Its been quite a while since I reloaded any cases that were fired in that type of rifle. I can't recall any separations.
PLEASE TAKE NOTE.
I am NOT talking about case head RUPTURES where the head cracks, and allows the combustion gas to blast back into the the breech - causing what we like to describe as a "kaboom."
I am talking about the situation where there is NO KABOOM. Rather, the brass simply separates roughly mid-way up the case, and the pressure is contained without incident, like this:
This pic shows what I'm talking about.
Forward part of the case, with a "broken shell extractor" still attached.
I've heard it suggested that "commercial" ammo is prone to case head separation failures in HK and CETME chambers.
I've also heard it suggested that reloaded ammo is more likely to separate in HK and CETME chambers.
Anybody have any experience with this?
Its been quite a while since I reloaded any cases that were fired in that type of rifle. I can't recall any separations.
PLEASE TAKE NOTE.
I am NOT talking about case head RUPTURES where the head cracks, and allows the combustion gas to blast back into the the breech - causing what we like to describe as a "kaboom."
I am talking about the situation where there is NO KABOOM. Rather, the brass simply separates roughly mid-way up the case, and the pressure is contained without incident, like this:
This pic shows what I'm talking about.
Forward part of the case, with a "broken shell extractor" still attached.