HK USP vs. HK 45 vs. Glock 21 SF

[marineman]

Out of these .45ACP choices, which would you choose and why? Also, does the Glock 21 SF accept 13 round magazines and does it include a rail? Thanks.

 

[CPshooter]

I personally think you can't go wrong with the USP, but the new HK45 is nice too. I would say it depends on the price difference.

I think Glock makes great guns too, but they aren't on the same "level" as H&Ks. I say this because I own a USPc40 and a Glock 19. I like the USPc40 better overall, but then again the Glock is lighter weight and less bulky. But in your case with the fatter and bulkier Glock 21, that point doesn't apply to your decision anyhow.

I think the H&K is better built and shoots better, plain and simple. If the $300 price difference doesn't matter to you, go H&K.

 

[Dobe]

All reliable, but he HK45 has the best ergonomics of the group. I own one, and enjoy shooting it. It is also as accurate as many of my 1911's.

 

[SsevenN]

ETA to the arrival of HK haters.

T minus 5 minutes and counting.

 

[Revolver Ocelot]

looks like someones poll has got me beat...lol

 

[benderx4]

HK45 unless you mean the HK USP45 Tactical with threaded barrel, adjustable sights and match trigger. I've got TWO and love them! 12+1 JHP 45acp sitting next to my bed just makes me sleep a tad better.

On the other hand, the HK45 is a hoot to shoot at the range. SO COMFORTABLE and easy to shoot VERY accurately. In fact, after getting my HK45 and USP45Ts, I couldn't justify my Mark 23 anymore and traded it.

Glock? Inexpensive, reliable - good gun overall but doesn't fit my hand very well, nor do I like its trigger and/or safety.

 

[gudel]

ETA to the arrival of HK haters

I wouldn't bother with them. They're not important.

I have purchased new on both, USP 45 and G21. I prefer the USP 45.