TDPerk
Member
Although, what Osborn thought Martin said* was what influenced his decision.
*As well as the policy of banning as effectively as they can (not that it stops criminals) the ownership of the most effective means of self defense, the private ownership of firearms.
And there is the case of Mr. Godfrey-Brown:
Pointless prescution, or trying to make a point?
"I was exceedingly angry about that," he said. "I went through that drama of nine and a half months. Why couldn't the CPS have dropped it earlier?"
They didn't drop the case earlier because they were fishing for a plea bargain, because it is effectively the policy, nevermind the useless document Agricola brings to us, for the British government to treat people who defend themselves as harshly as possible, subject only to the government prosecutors feelings about what they can get away with.
Yours, TDP
*As well as the policy of banning as effectively as they can (not that it stops criminals) the ownership of the most effective means of self defense, the private ownership of firearms.
And there is the case of Mr. Godfrey-Brown:
Pointless prescution, or trying to make a point?
"I was exceedingly angry about that," he said. "I went through that drama of nine and a half months. Why couldn't the CPS have dropped it earlier?"
They didn't drop the case earlier because they were fishing for a plea bargain, because it is effectively the policy, nevermind the useless document Agricola brings to us, for the British government to treat people who defend themselves as harshly as possible, subject only to the government prosecutors feelings about what they can get away with.
Yours, TDP