It's interesting that the motives and character of Glass are so easily impuned, but the Homeowner seems to be getting a free ride as if everything he reported was factual...
I'm not giving the homeowner a free ride. I am withholding judgement until I know more.
But the undisputed fact remain the same. Glass was in his house.
As I've said, I don't buy the explaination that a THIRD PARTY said as to why he would be there.
I never said I easily impuned his character-- but I don't buy a story just because someone is selling it-- especially someone that wasn't there. My extrapolation of Glass has to do with the unexplained and undisputed fact of being there. Couple that with a idiotic explaination by a third party.
Then consider that we DO have an explaination from someone who was there. Unless I have a reason to disbelieve the person in his OWN home and minding his own business, he DOES get more credibility with me at this point.
-- John