Pork Fat
Member
I have seen it written in a couple of threads that someone getting a Stoeger
Condor or equivalent gun for sporting clays will likely get frustrated and quit.
This scenario is to illustrate the futility of attempting to start out with a budget gun, and that one really MUST spend 800-1200 bucks just to give themselves and the sport a fair shake.
Are these Turkish boomsticks so ill-fitting, inaccurate, or fragile as all that?
How about the Russian guns? I pick up a Khan or Huglu or Baikal, throw it up to my shoulder, and think "Not bad". They definitely are not as well finished
as the nicer brands. I can appreciate the Berettas and Brownings and I believe that they are worth the money. I, however, am not.
Is the money in the polishing and wood-to-metal fit? Or is the steel and wood itself so markedly superior? My current guns consist of a Mossberg 500 riot gun and an 870 Express,so you can see that my shotgun aesthetic is not very advanced. The Remington does as well as I let it at sporting clays, but I feel a bit underdressed when the Perrazzi guys come by in their golf carts.
Also, is there a thread or chart that shows who actually makes the guns for some of these brands? (Stoeger, Mossberg, Remington Spartan, CZ, etc.)
I know some of this has been touched on before, and I apologize for any redundancy, but any fresh insights will help. This could be the shotgun guy's
"Hi-Point vs. SIG", so I'll sit back and wait in eager anticipation. Thanks-
Condor or equivalent gun for sporting clays will likely get frustrated and quit.
This scenario is to illustrate the futility of attempting to start out with a budget gun, and that one really MUST spend 800-1200 bucks just to give themselves and the sport a fair shake.
Are these Turkish boomsticks so ill-fitting, inaccurate, or fragile as all that?
How about the Russian guns? I pick up a Khan or Huglu or Baikal, throw it up to my shoulder, and think "Not bad". They definitely are not as well finished
as the nicer brands. I can appreciate the Berettas and Brownings and I believe that they are worth the money. I, however, am not.
Is the money in the polishing and wood-to-metal fit? Or is the steel and wood itself so markedly superior? My current guns consist of a Mossberg 500 riot gun and an 870 Express,so you can see that my shotgun aesthetic is not very advanced. The Remington does as well as I let it at sporting clays, but I feel a bit underdressed when the Perrazzi guys come by in their golf carts.
Also, is there a thread or chart that shows who actually makes the guns for some of these brands? (Stoeger, Mossberg, Remington Spartan, CZ, etc.)
I know some of this has been touched on before, and I apologize for any redundancy, but any fresh insights will help. This could be the shotgun guy's
"Hi-Point vs. SIG", so I'll sit back and wait in eager anticipation. Thanks-