Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

How big a role do looks play in your firearms purchases?

Discussion in 'General Gun Discussions' started by Drjones, Oct 27, 2003.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Drjones

    Drjones member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    2,803
    Well?

    Some guns are just ugly, and regardless of reliability, price, etc., I wouldn't purchase them. Rugers and S&W come to mind. (Of course these are just my opinions and not intended to flame anyone. :) )

    Others, like Berettas and 1911's, are just beautiful works of art that I must have.

    So, how much of a role does looks play in your decision whether to purchase a firearm or not?
     
  2. 444

    444 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    8,086
    Location:
    Ohio
    Depends what I am buying it for. I buy some guns almost strictly on looks. For working guns, looks play no role at all.
     
  3. Andrew Rothman

    Andrew Rothman Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2003
    Messages:
    2,669
    Location:
    MN
    I actually thought that my Ruger was quite pretty when I bought it. Now Glocks, on the other hand... :neener:

    Looks DID play an additional part -- I wanted black, not silver.

    Turns out that IWB is a moist, salty environment, and blued steel can rust!

    I went out and bought a new, stainless slide. (And the rest of the gun that came with it, but don't tell my wife!)

    Now I realize that no one ever sees my CCW, except at the range, and that I care more about how it shoots than how it looks.
     
  4. spacemanspiff

    spacemanspiff Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    4,067
    Location:
    alaska
    well if the person working at the gunshop is attractive, i might be talked into buying something i normally wouldnt.




    oh wait, you mean the looks of the GUN?? oops, hehehe....
    if it shoots, is of a caliber i like, and the price is right, i'll buy. however, i'd never buy one of those clunky hi-points cause 1. its not known for reliability; 2. its butt-ugly!
     
  5. cool45auto

    cool45auto Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2003
    Messages:
    2,261
    Location:
    Cleveland, Georgia
    Well, I carry an Italian bred supermodel every day. Does that answer your question?;)
     
  6. Top_Notch

    Top_Notch Member

    Joined:
    May 28, 2003
    Messages:
    232
    I own a glock. I think that says enough in itself. :what:
     
  7. OEF_VET

    OEF_VET Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2003
    Messages:
    2,062
    Location:
    Murfreesboro, TN
    Hey, beauty is only skin deep right? Besides, she may be ugly, but she's got a great personality.
     
  8. Blackhawk

    Blackhawk Member In Memoriam

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    3,882
    With pistols, I'm one of those "form follows function" wonks. Basically, if it's black, tactical black* I like it -- basically, anyway. If it's got some doodads, furbalos, buttons, etc., on it, they have to be reasonable for their function. If it's bloated or over designed or has features that say "designer privilege in making a statement", I don't like those features. My penchant for DAO pistols has somewhat spoiled the looks of SA/DA or SA pistols in my eyes. Somehow all the extra "junk" hanging off a 1911 spoils their looks compared to how I used to "see" them. Maybe that's because I think of every protrusion and control as something else to go wrong or to screw up the operation when I need to launch a bullet.

    Revolvers can vary considerably with decoration and features that are intrinsically appealing.

    Long guns are different. Except for the black tactical rifles/carbines, they offer a great platform for wonderful artistry. A finely finished and tooled walnut stock with engraving on the metal parts can be a thing of rare beauty that incidentally launches projectiles.

    (*copyright by Skunkabilly)
     
  9. tex_n_cal

    tex_n_cal Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2003
    Messages:
    1,160
    Location:
    CA
    luckily, I have never found a good looking woman working in a gunshop. I'd be driving a Yugo if I had.:evil:

    edit to add:

    Oh damn. I just thought of one. She's my age, too:confused:

    Oh! the gun's looks? :D

    Yes, it does matter, though I have bought guns that I couldn't really call good looking, like my XP100 or a Glock 22.
     
  10. Edward429451

    Edward429451 member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    2,251
    Location:
    Colorado Springs Colorado
    No way. A nice looking gun is nice but I dont really give a rats brass what it looks like as long as it works to please. You should see my SG! With its mis matched finishes and horrible home camo job, its so ugly they prolly wouldn't steal it. But it's slick as a whistle with a WM under all that ugly!! Its a sleeper.

    If I'm buying new, I'll make em walk to the back to get a fresh one if the display model is dinged somehow. I do try to take care of them though, I just don't cry if one gets dinged accidently. Buying scratched name brand guns is a good way to get a great deal...can help whittle the price down a little.
     
  11. Brian Dale

    Brian Dale Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2003
    Messages:
    3,554
    Location:
    on the farm
    I'd like to say that only function matters to me, but I know it isn't true. I like blued steel and nice wood a lot. A beautiful stock wouldn't get me to buy a weapon that wasn't reliable, though. Shape matters, too. Lever rifles, EBRs, nice bolties - there are a lot of things on the list. The Ruger Number 1 looks so good that I wish they were made by a company that I'd buy from (maybe a used one ... Hmmm...) My Remington Model 11 shotgun (same as an Auto-5) won't win any beauty contests, unless the judges are grown-up shotgunners. If it hadn't been my granddad's gift to me, I wouldn't have learned how well they perform. I like balanced looks, whether the aesthetic is "duck-hunter traditional" or ultra-tactical.

    There are a lot of handguns that should be on my list of future purchases ahead of a CZ-52. Not the most common ammo; .45 and 9mm (and several other rounds, for that matter) make much more practical sense to me. That almost-Art-Deco style, with a touch of Buck Rogers, grabs me, though. :cool: Once I have my Smith K-frame and a good auto, I'll probably get one. Smith J-frames get so much praise that it feels weird to prefer a Detective Special. A Chief Special would be good, but no matter how well Bodyguards and Centennials work (are those the hidden and shrouded-hammer models?), I don't want either one. They're so ugly that I feel like they're gonna make my eyes bleed. :evil: OOps- gotta go hide in my asbestos-lined bunker now.

    Maybe I'm just proof that there's no accounting for taste. :neener:
     
  12. DorGunR

    DorGunR Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2003
    Messages:
    646
    Location:
    Maryland
    How big a role do looks play in your firearms purchases?

    Well, I don't and won't own a Glock..........does that answer the question????;)
     
  13. Dorrin79

    Dorrin79 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2003
    Messages:
    883
    Location:
    Central Texas
    i'd like to think that only function matters to me, but it's not true.

    I do require a certain "elegance of form and substance" from my guns.

    To me, the 1911 pretty much exemplifies this.
     
  14. Stevie-Ray

    Stevie-Ray Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2003
    Messages:
    4,087
    Location:
    Mitchi-gun, the Sunrise Side
    How big a role?

    Some but not all, of course. After all, I do own 3 1911s. (Carry one regularly) They are without a doubt the most beautiful guns ever made. I've even done things to pretty one up.:D

    However, I also own a Glock 26 and a HK USP45C. Gads, but those are some ugly suckers! But I wouldn't give up either of them.
     
  15. Werewolf

    Werewolf Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2003
    Messages:
    4,192
    Location:
    Oklahoma
    Well for a working gun function comes first though I'll always pick black over silver.

    For a fun gun I'd like to think function rules but the fact is looks are important too.

    For example I don't care how good a pistol is those two tone monstrosities out there will never find their way into any collection of mine.

    And silver/nickel/stainless steel???? Puleeeze! (Though I have seen a few western style pistols in SS that I thought might look nice in my Buscadero rig - but then woke up and went "What the hell was I thinking".

    Some guns have looks that just grow on ya. For example a Glock. Ugly as sin when I first got my G22 but after awhile it's clean lines and purely functional design started to look good and still does. I used to like the way a Beretta 92 looked but now - they just look gaudy (and the way the barrel pokes out the end of the things - hell - reminds of a damn dog with a hard on). I'll always like the way a 1911 looks.

    As to rifles - can't say as I've ever seen one I didn't like the looks of except may an SKS or some of those super modern target type things that look like something out of Star Wars.

    Last but not least - for the price we pay for some of the guns we buy they better by god look good!

    Yes - unfortunately - looks do matter.
     
  16. LeonCarr

    LeonCarr Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2003
    Messages:
    3,819
    Location:
    At The Range
    Looks matter none, performance is everything. All of my firearms are matte finished, non-reflective with nylon/fiberglass stocks or polymer frames(Glocks). I like all go, no show :).

    Only a pimp in a cheap New Orleans whorehouse would put a pearl handle on a pistol - General George S. Patton

    Just my .02,
    LeonCarr
     
  17. El Tejon

    El Tejon Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    18,085
    Location:
    Lafayette, Indiana-the Ned Flanders neighbor to Il
    For me, 0; for THR, 110%:D
     
  18. DorGunR

    DorGunR Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2003
    Messages:
    646
    Location:
    Maryland
    Only a pimp in a cheap New Orleans whorehouse would put a pearl handle on a pistol - General George S. Patton

    I don't have any pistols with pearl handles (prefer wood) but I believe General George Patton wore a pair of pearl handle pistols.
     
  19. Brian Dale

    Brian Dale Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2003
    Messages:
    3,554
    Location:
    on the farm
    GunneR, in the movie, they were ivory. That's where the quote comes from. There was a THR thread a while back with pictures of his SAA and his .357 Smith (Registered Magnum?), IIRC.
     
  20. Beetle Bailey

    Beetle Bailey Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2003
    Messages:
    1,240
    Location:
    California
    Uh, YES!

    I like to say form follows function, but it's not always true. I'm not sure exactly what you are asking, but I'll try to cover it all.

    I just bought a pistol that will serve as a HD gun. I got a CZ 75 compact in black. I would have liked the satin nickel finish, but it's not available in California due to the DoJ. I was gonna put some aftermarket wood grips on it (CZ lovers know what I'm talking about) but went with rubber grips in part because my guess is they will be better for combat, should the need arise. I might have to buy another CZ so I can have those great wood grips, though :rolleyes: .

    There are also lots of rifles that I just refuse to buy because of the ugly design, but I won't mention names. But, with rifles, since I don't hunt, are only going to be used for target shooting (or TEOTWAWKI) and there are a lot of choices for quality stuff that looks good to me.

    I also buy Milsurp rifles, so even though I don't consider myself a collector, I will pay more for a nicer copy of the rifle that I want, so if looks = condition, yes looks matter. I mean, of course I want accuracy, but I also don't want it to look like it's been in a war or something :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
     
  21. P95Carry

    P95Carry Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2003
    Messages:
    16,341
    Location:
    South PA, and a bit West of center!
    ERGONOMICS .... first .. with reliability ... then looks. In as much as looks do in part reflect on the piece's functionality to a degree ... on a revo ... where is the cyl latch release button ... on an auto . where is slide lock .. safety etc. if these various things are in the right place - for me - then I'll rate the looks better probably.

    Beyond looks tho is ''pretty'' ... and that I do not have much interest in. I do admire the engravings on some shotties but that won't influence my purchase .... function is what I am after .. ergonomic finction - and reliability, with strength.
     
  22. Jammer Six

    Jammer Six member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2003
    Messages:
    943
    Location:
    Seattle
    I won't buy it unless it looks exactly like a 1911.

    Since I only buy 1911's, this hasn't been a problem.
     
  23. SteelyDan

    SteelyDan Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    1,108
    Location:
    Minnesota
    21.3 percent
     
  24. BerettaNut92

    BerettaNut92 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2002
    Messages:
    9,724
    Ergonomics, userfriendliness and reliability...all important but looks make me appreciate it more. You know, like when you take it out of the holster, look at it and think 'damn, you're good' and reholster :eek:
     
  25. MPFreeman

    MPFreeman Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    275
    Location:
    Sacred lair
    Looks play a part. No doubt. How much? Not much. I don't want to own any auto pistol that is nickel plated, or gold anodized. YUCK! I will never own a commemorative weapon to hang on a wall, partly because the look silly to me.

    I like nice wood on my stocks. I like parkarized pistols. I like stainless revolvers.

    So looks play a bottom 10-20% on my purchase.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page