How hard is it to shoot large revolvers with one hand?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Several points are worth commenting on.

First is GET A BETTER LIGHT!!! Maglights are heavy, awkward, clumsy and not good shooting lights. Sure-fire lights are about the size of a mini-maglight, but have MORE light output than a 3D cell maglight with a krypton bulb. The batteries have a 10 year shelf life also. They are vastly superior lights to the mag lights. I stubbornly clung to my maglights for years after people told me about the new lights. I finally tried one. My mag lights sit and gather dust. I now have 3 sure-fire lights, and a Streamlight Scorpion, another very high output light. Get batteries direct from Surefire and they are very affordable. they have a web site. Look real hard at their combat lights. You can hold the light AND the gun and work the light at will. Cops all over are quiting the mag lights and goind to the new lights because they are so much lighter and handier, as well as being capable of literally blinding someone for a few seconds, almost like a flash bulb. A true weapon grade light. Sorry to go on about this, but I'm still surprised that anyone is still using the old lights.


Most Smith and Wesson revolvers can be set up to use moon clips, they still work fine without moon clips as well. Safariland speed loaders are also very fast, noticably faster than HKS loaders (another case of me stubbornly hanging on to what I'd used for a long time, only to try the "new" thing and be an instant convert to something that was obviously much superior) the comp 1's are the only ones made for the 44's and 45's, but if you have a gun they make comp 2 or comp 3's for, they are even faster yet. The comp 2's and 3's will even feed full wadcutters.


45 Colt brass will not cause any problems from the rim or any other part of the case. People have been loading 45 Colt brass in appropraite guns to levels over 44 mag for many years with absolutely no problems. It is slightly lighter than some makes of 44 mag brass, but will take any load your gun will, and then some.

Having said that, I feel that the 44 mag is a more practical cartridge for general use, particulary if you do not reload. 44 special loads can be used in any 44 mag with no problem.

There is really no good reason to shoot one handed unless you have to by circumstance. I'd be interested to see someone shoot that feels they shoot better one handed, on paper, at ranges out to 100 yards with full power loads. I practice one handed, I've shot pistols extensively for over 30 years. I shoot better groups with 2 hands, I hit more consistantly hunting and in the field with 2 hands. Under stress you can shoot better, faster with 2 hands. If you doubt this, how many top competetive shooters use 1 hand? I don't mean to be contrary, but I only know one person that shoots exremely well one handed, and he was an exibition grade shooter and shot a Colt Single Action 45 for everything. He is truly a world class shooter, and has done some remarkable things with a sixgun (like things thrown in the air, cigarettes from peoples mouths, hand held objects etc,). He shoots one handed because of historical considerations, and has spent a lifetime gaining proficiency that most of us will only wish we had.
 
"There is really no good reason to shoot one handed unless you have to by circumstance."

And if he's talking about using the gun while carrying a light, it is necessary.

" I don't mean to be contrary, but I only know one person that shoots exremely well one handed, and he was an exibition grade shooter and shot a Colt Single Action 45 for everything. He is truly a world class shooter, and has done some remarkable things with a sixgun (like things thrown in the air, cigarettes from peoples mouths, hand held objects etc,). He shoots one handed because of historical considerations, and has spent a lifetime gaining proficiency that most of us will only wish we had."

I never said it was common. I also shoot revolvers much better than autoloaders, one or two handed. That's probably rare also. Must have something to do with the fact the only revolver (infact, handgun) I had for years was a SBH in.44 Magnum.
It could simply be a case of having practiced so long with one hand that I simply developed skill in that area and neglected the two-hand shooting?

Oh well, like I said, used what works for you.
 
Mag88c, I'm guess I'm with you more than it first apeared.
I too shoot a revolver better than an auto, and most people that I know are the same.

About the light, with the new combat lights it is possible to use both hands on the gun and have the light ready and usable. Not quite as good as two hands without the light, but much better than one handed.

I would still like to see someone shoot one handed and keep up accuracy and speed wise with a decent shot shooting two handed though. This is not intended to sound critical, I just don't think it can be done (with the noted exception), though I'm open to believing what I can see first hand. I do believe that someone can become very good shooting one handed with an extreme amount of practice, and applaud your willingness to practice and your desire to shoot well one handed, but I also feel that the same or even lower level of practice two handed will produce even better results.

I shot one handed weak hand for a couple of years after an injury to my right hand, I have also shot a fair amount of one handed strong hand, and know a number of very good pistol shots in Wyoming and Arizona that can shoot very well one handed, but all will say they can shoot better with two hands. I just see no reason to handicap oneself shooting one handed when results count.

I agree with you when you say "use what works for you", I pefer a single action revolver for most of my shooting, including some plate shoots. I did better than the majority of shooters with more "modern" guns on the 5 plate stage, but still know that someone with the same level of skill with a DA revolver can shoot better scores than I can with the SA.

Mag88c, I appreciate your comments, if you get to northwest Wyoming look me up, I'd like to compare notes and get out and shoot with you. We have room to shoot about anywhere, and shooting out to 300 yards with pistols is a lot of fun.
 
"About the light, with the new combat lights it is possible to use both hands on the gun and have the light ready and usable. Not quite as good as two hands without the light, but much better than one handed."

OK, I was introducing my own prejudices there. I don't like such an arrangement. If you light someone up and they decide to shoot back, they'll probably use the light as a general aiming point, meaning they'll be shooting at you. I prefer to hold the light out and away from my body, giving them less to hit, plus it distracts them away from the real threat. . .MY gun.

"I would still like to see someone shoot one handed and keep up accuracy and speed wise with a decent shot shooting two handed though."

Problem there is it's apple and oranges. I never said I could outshoot anyone but me one-handed vs two. That'd be like asking a good hand who does a lot of two-handed work to try and shoot someone who's only done one-handed work.

"Mag88c, I appreciate your comments, if you get to northwest Wyoming look me up, I'd like to compare notes and get out and shoot with you. We have room to shoot about anywhere, and shooting out to 300 yards with pistols is a lot of fun."

Will do, I love it out west, and am hoping/trying to move out that way as soon as I can.
 
Mag, what area are you interested in? I've roamed around a fair bit, settled in the Cody Wyoming area about 15 years ago. If you like shooting and hunting most of the Rocky Mt states are pretty gun friendly.
 
Actually I already have some acreage in Nevada, in the RUby Mountains near Lamoille. It's just a matter of fund ans finding a job before I move.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top