How many bullets in a pound?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Aug 10, 2004
Messages
1,541
Is this math correct?

Powder conversion factor:
1 gram = 15.4 grains
1 pound = 453.6 grams
6985.44 grains in a pound

If I load a 9mm with 4.3 Unique, then:
6985.44/4.3 = 1624.5 cartridges per pound.

Therefore I get 16 boxes of 100 out of every pound.

If powder is $15/pound, then the cost per box of 100 = $.94.
 
Close enough. There are 7000 grains in a pound. So if you load 4.3 grains and don't spill any in the process you can load 7000/4.3 = 1627 cartridges and have about 4 grains left over.

This is like deja-vu all over again....
 
"... then the cost per box of 100 = $.94"

That should be: "... then the cost of powder per box of 100 = $.94". You also have to add in the cost of the bullet, the brass (if bought) and the primer.

A gentle reminder: your thread title "How many bullets in a pound?" is slightly incorrect in light of what your actual question is. A bullet is only the projectile. The proper term for the completed cartridge is "round". IOW, "How many rounds in a pound [of powder]?" would be the way to state the question. I know we're not the word police around here, just trying to add a little to your ejumication. ;)
 
I saw the title, and thought it was a question about bullet casting. Heh.
(How many bullets can be cast out of a pound of lead.) but I see that isn't the question at all.
7000 divided by the number of grains in your load will give you the number of loads per pound.
 
Hey Mal...How 'bout "Cartridge"...Is that a whole round ?
Trying to make trouble, eh TB? :D I'm kidding!

However, to answer your question, no, strictly speaking a cartridge is not necessarily a whole round. A round is generally construed to mean a single unit of ammunition - case, powder, primer and projectile. Whereas a cartridge is the metal (or paper/cardboard) cylinder which holds a powder charge and is often topped off with a projectile, but not always. I do agree that in common usage 'cartridge' and 'round' are synonymous.
 
Meee???:D Lil' ol' me:D ...Trying to cause trouble?:D Nawwww:D ...I like your final defination though...I have always though that a "round" or a "cartridge" were in fact the same in general terms...You are right, though...It was brought forward from paper "rounds" of yore...
 
definition of "cartridge" (and pistol, while we're at it)

Mal H wrote:
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
However, to answer your question, no, strictly speaking a cartridge is not necessarily a whole round. A round is generally construed to mean a single unit of ammunition - case, powder, primer and projectile. Whereas a cartridge is the metal (or paper/cardboard) cylinder which holds a powder charge and is often topped off with a projectile, but not always. I do agree that in common usage 'cartridge' and 'round' are synonymous.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

I'm not clear, Mal H. Are you saying 'cartridge = case', or are you saying 'Cartridge = case + powder'? And what about the primer?

I'm no expert, but I'm pretty sure that 'case" is the term for the metal/paper/cardboard cylinder, and that 'cartridge' means 'case + powder + primer + projectile(s), assembled".

OK, I just looked "cartridge" up in my American Heritage dictionary.

1.a A tubular metal or cardboard and metal case containing the propellant powder and primer of small arms ammunition or shotgun shells.

1.b. such a case loaded with shotgun pellets.

1.c. such a case fitted with a projectile, such as a bullet, for use in rifled small arms, machine guns and the like. Also called a "round".


My Nosler Reloading Manual defines cartridge as "A complete round of ammunition with all components intact". It defines 'components' as "the items necessary to load a cartridge (brass, primer, powder, bullet)." Brass is defined as "...empty cartridge cases".

I would think that American Heritage's definition 1.a would more properly be called a blank cartridge, and the default definition should include the projectile(s). And obviously, shotgun shells are a form of small arms ammunition, as American Heritage defines small arms as "firearms carried in the hand".

I know I may be seen as a pedantic "word Nazi" here, but I think confusion over terms and overuse of slang keep a lot of people from learning more about guns, and I think that's a shame.



Then again, maybe "cartridge" did mean "case" back in the 1860s. I dunno. I know I get irritated with people who try to correct me if I refer to a revolver as a pistol. Historically, and in my book, 'pistol' = 'handgun'. What sense does it make to call both a single-shot flintlock dueling piece and a Glock pistols, but insist that a Peacemaker and a Detective Special are not pistols?

Earp, Hardin, Hickock, Holliday and the rest of those Old West guys who got famous for killing people with revolvers were called 'pistoleros', not 'handgunners'.

My suspicion is that when the Colt 1911 and various revolvers were both common in the US military, the 1911 was referred to as the pistol and the revolvers as revolvers. Perhaps this occurred in the militaries of other nations too. I'm guessing that a generation or 2 of screaming and historically ignorant drill sergeants made the term 'handgun' necessary to avoid being constantly and incorrectly "corrected" by ex-military types.


Wow. Off-topic rant, anyone? :rolleyes: :eek:
 
i just call'em what i call'em and you are free to correct me. i will call them what you call them until you walk away. i will then revert to my former state of ignorance. however, we may we both feel free to shake our heads for a moment as we part.

i read the forergoing posts with great interest, but, could someone please repeat the finer points in greater detail and much more slowly, MUCH more slowly. thank you in advance.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top