Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

How Many Jobs Lost In A Ban?

Discussion in 'General Gun Discussions' started by Treo, Nov 20, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Treo

    Treo member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2007
    Messages:
    3,110
    Location:
    Co. Springs
    In the event of a total gun ban how many jobs would be lost? Would American factories be able to continue to produce firearms for sale overseas? What would be the impact on the economy if some number of workers were put out of a job by said ban?

    Does anyone think this might be a limiting factor on congress while considering (at any point) such a ban?

    What Is the possibility that G*o*v*e*r*n*m*e*n*t *s*p*o*o*k*s are reading my email and monitoring my cell phone because I posted this? :what:
     
  2. Sinixstar

    Sinixstar member

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2008
    Messages:
    897
    Not quite sure how many jobs would be lost.
    There could easily be provisions made that would allow for the export of guns - in which case mfg's could still stay in business - although at a reduced capacity.

    Yes, I think that is a major limiting factor right now. The economy is by far the #1 issue on most people's minds, and anything that would put people out of work like that is simply not going to fly.

    As far as "Government Spooks" - very little. Don't be a paranoid "gun nut". :)
     
  3. tblt

    tblt member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2007
    Messages:
    954
    Location:
    florida
    there will not be a total gun ban
     
  4. PTK

    PTK Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2007
    Messages:
    3,712
    Location:
    Montana
    Sinixstar,

    I believe our friend Treo was making a joke about spooks. ;)
     
  5. Hawk

    Hawk Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    3,512
    Location:
    Grand Prairie, TX
    A turn-in similar to the one in the UK would cost around a trillion dollars.

    It would require its own agency and bureaucracy complete with mini fiefdoms, support staff and etc.

    I'd expect to see a net gain of 35,000 jobs, all of which would be thought to be temporary when first authorized but ending up as permanent.

    Fifty years after the ban it would have an annual cost approximating the war on drugs, employing a similar number of people and exhibiting similar success.
     
  6. PTK

    PTK Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2007
    Messages:
    3,712
    Location:
    Montana
    Hawk,

    That's probably closest to reality. Fighting would probably be worse than the War on (Some) Drugs.
     
  7. DoubleTapDrew

    DoubleTapDrew Member

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2006
    Messages:
    5,356
    Location:
    Oregon
    They have next generation satellites and black helicopters linked up to you now that can see right through tinfoil!!!
    Hawk is correct about the gov't bureaucracy that would be created. Embrace the "change" :banghead:
     
  8. Treo

    Treo member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2007
    Messages:
    3,110
    Location:
    Co. Springs
    Now would I do that?

    Actually, I was making a joke about posters who think puttin asterisks in your typing will throw the g*o*v*e*r*n*m*e*n*t s*p*o*o*k*s off
     
  9. MIL-DOT

    MIL-DOT member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2006
    Messages:
    3,110
    Location:
    Georgia,C.S.A.
    (quote) "Actually, I was making a joke about posters who think puttin asterisks in your typing will throw the g*o*v*e*r*n*m*e*n*t s*p*o*o*k*s off"

    You just missed an asterisk between the t and the s !!! :eek: RUN !! They've got your position, RUN NOW !!!! :what:
     
  10. hso

    hso Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2003
    Messages:
    48,721
    Location:
    0 hrs east of TN
    Low to no, unless you're involved in something that already has them looking into your activities.

    I tried to figure this one out, including the whole supply chain, and decided it was too small to matter outside of states with several manufacturers. That doesn't mean we shouldn't use it as an emotional argument in a time when manufacturing jobs will be critically important as unemployment races through the service industries (that make up far too much of our economy), but the raw numbers won't impress anyone.
     
    Last edited: Nov 21, 2008
  11. Kind of Blued

    Kind of Blued Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2007
    Messages:
    3,676
    Location:
    Rocky Mountains
    I think a "total ban" has been explained, and not to change the topic, but... well, ok, here I go. Luckily, I don't see an AWB hurting the gun industry THAT badly.

    If you own a company that only makes flashiders and quick-detach bayonet lugs, you might need to start coming up with ideas.

    The amount of profit that the firearm industry will lose is probably MADE UP FOR in the time from the election to inauguration anyway. That being said, it still sucks.
     
  12. yeti

    yeti Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2006
    Messages:
    913
    Location:
    NEK, Vermont
    First, the * between letters does not throw us...er ...them off, you need to use ¥, between letters, and Ω, between words.

    And Treo, your e mails are dull:scrutiny:, don't worry about them, but your cell calls!!!!! You stud!:what::D
     
  13. 22-rimfire

    22-rimfire Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2005
    Messages:
    11,450
    Location:
    TN
    A new AWB such as was done in 1994 would not destroy the firearms industry in this country. But it is another nail in the coffin of freedom loving American citizens.
     
    Last edited: Nov 21, 2008
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page