evan price
Member
Dad gave me his MEC Sizemaster. I've only been loading up some Lee slugs with it. When I could get cheap target shotshells for $4-$5 a box, it wasn't intetresting to me... Now that target shells are getting toward $7-$8 a box, it looks like it's worth the time to reload basic shot shells now too.
So-
I have been saving my Remington Gun Club green hulls. Got about 500 of them. I know they are the unibody hulls like the old Win AA hulls and are good to go with Nitro or STS data.
I have PROMO powder, #8 shot, Win209 primers, now the wad choice.
For my slugs I'm using the grey WINAA12L 7/8 oz wad with my slugs. I could use this to load 7/8 oz or 1 oz shot loads. Dad says I can use up to 1-1/8 oz for trap so I would need a different wad.
What's the advantage to one wad over another?
I use the WAA12L grey for slugs because it fits great and I get a nice crimp.
For shot, I can use the Claybusters copies- CB8100-12 copy of Rem TGT-12, CB8118-12 copy of Rem figure 8, CB1100-12 copy of WinAA12SL, CB4118-12B Windjammer- all are in stock at my local gunstore.
When dealing with a generic taper wall hull and the same weight of shot, assuming load data is available, is there a specific difference in one wad's properties over another wad?
The WAA12SL is what a lot of people just say is the generic wad for these hulls. But why not the Rem figure-8 wad which would have been factory? And are the Windjammer designs with more, smaller petals worth trying? Somebody said to try the Green Dusters but I think Claybusters took over them, too. And somebody said the purple wad was what he liked (but he couldn't tell me the part number, just that it was purple).
Seems a bit more confusing than metalllic reloading.
Also they say that you need to follow the recipe exactly as shown.
But the recipe shows- for example- for 1200 fps use 17.5 grains, for 1250 fps use 18 grains, for 1300 fps use 18.5 grains.
Why can't I use something in between those ranges, if my charge bar drops exactly- for example- 17.8 grains and I don't mind being a little high/low of published data?
So-
I have been saving my Remington Gun Club green hulls. Got about 500 of them. I know they are the unibody hulls like the old Win AA hulls and are good to go with Nitro or STS data.
I have PROMO powder, #8 shot, Win209 primers, now the wad choice.
For my slugs I'm using the grey WINAA12L 7/8 oz wad with my slugs. I could use this to load 7/8 oz or 1 oz shot loads. Dad says I can use up to 1-1/8 oz for trap so I would need a different wad.
What's the advantage to one wad over another?
I use the WAA12L grey for slugs because it fits great and I get a nice crimp.
For shot, I can use the Claybusters copies- CB8100-12 copy of Rem TGT-12, CB8118-12 copy of Rem figure 8, CB1100-12 copy of WinAA12SL, CB4118-12B Windjammer- all are in stock at my local gunstore.
When dealing with a generic taper wall hull and the same weight of shot, assuming load data is available, is there a specific difference in one wad's properties over another wad?
The WAA12SL is what a lot of people just say is the generic wad for these hulls. But why not the Rem figure-8 wad which would have been factory? And are the Windjammer designs with more, smaller petals worth trying? Somebody said to try the Green Dusters but I think Claybusters took over them, too. And somebody said the purple wad was what he liked (but he couldn't tell me the part number, just that it was purple).
Seems a bit more confusing than metalllic reloading.
Also they say that you need to follow the recipe exactly as shown.
But the recipe shows- for example- for 1200 fps use 17.5 grains, for 1250 fps use 18 grains, for 1300 fps use 18.5 grains.
Why can't I use something in between those ranges, if my charge bar drops exactly- for example- 17.8 grains and I don't mind being a little high/low of published data?