Jason_W
Member
In California, anyway.
I'm still unclear as to what the point of prop 63 was, given that it seems to be redundant after laws were passed earlier this year by the California legislature.
Anyway, barring the supreme Court overturning things, by 2018 California shooters will have to pass a background check to buy ammo, will not be able to buy ammo out of state, and will not be able to have ammo orders delivered to their residences.
Not wanting any part of that noise, my idea is to spend the next year and change stocking up on enough ammo and reloading supplies to last years. As of now, no additional restraints are being put on hand loaders but it wouldn't surprise me if that's on the legislatures to-do list.
I'm hoping that all California gun owners will similarly stock up in order to get as much ammo in circulation prior to the new law kicking in so as to make the restrictions more of a pointless money waster than they already are.
Ammo purchase as civil disobedience.
I'm still unclear as to what the point of prop 63 was, given that it seems to be redundant after laws were passed earlier this year by the California legislature.
Anyway, barring the supreme Court overturning things, by 2018 California shooters will have to pass a background check to buy ammo, will not be able to buy ammo out of state, and will not be able to have ammo orders delivered to their residences.
Not wanting any part of that noise, my idea is to spend the next year and change stocking up on enough ammo and reloading supplies to last years. As of now, no additional restraints are being put on hand loaders but it wouldn't surprise me if that's on the legislatures to-do list.
I'm hoping that all California gun owners will similarly stock up in order to get as much ammo in circulation prior to the new law kicking in so as to make the restrictions more of a pointless money waster than they already are.
Ammo purchase as civil disobedience.