bullbarrel
Member
A note about Smith letting you send the s9ve back free, both ways shipping paid, and no charge whatsoever. In my case they simply did not fix the gun. And they stand ready for me to send it to them again. I didn't bother.
I guess first of all with my infinite wisdom I will teach you to spell INFINITE.
Your right what was I thinking trying to modify my handgun by myself from the factory to make it better I'm not a real gunsmith.
A note about Smith letting you send the s9ve back free, both ways shipping paid, and no charge whatsoever. In my case they simply did not fix the gun. And they stand ready for me to send it to them again. I didn't bother.
Sorry they didn't fix it for you, but I would sure send back to let them try again. I had to do this once for a keltec, and second time they usually have the trained monkeys work on it, instead of the monkeys in training.
Court: "So you decided to change the gun, correct"
You: "It was only a spring!"
Court: "That changed the trigger to make it easier to fire"
You" "Yes, and Yo Mama told me not to, but I didn't listen"
My point was just that I wanted to make the pistol better for me. I didn't like the grittiness off the trigger and that's why I changed it. I asked about the trigger job from S&W but they wouldn't do it anymore unless there was an actual problem with the firearm not working correctly and that's why I posted it.
The purpose of the pigtail spring is to make the trigger harder to pull and to insure a solid, quick reset. Without the pigtail spring the trigger is much easier to pull, but I can't perceive any difference in the reset. I have shot about 9,000 rounds down range since removing the pigtail spring and have never had the trigger fail to reset.Does anyone know what the function of the pigtail spring is?
Writerinmo, well said! I'm happy with my SW9VE.I EDC a SW40VE. Has proven to be reliable with 180gr rounds. As an old revolver guy I don't see why everyone has their panties in a twist over the long pull. It's designed that way for a reason... you have NO safeties on it!
S&W NEVER did 'trigger jobs' on them. If a customer complained about the "gritty" trigger, they took it back and polished the sear assembly. While it might have lightened the pull a pound, it sure made it FEEL a lot lighter for sure.
The Sigma is still taking a beating over the 1st Gen ones. If you happen to still have one and you send it in for work, S&W replaces it with a new one. Everyone who had one agrees that the early ones were POS.
Most of the detractors across the web are non-owners who just don't like it because it is a "Tupperware" pistol... the same reason they don't like Glocks or Keltecs, they want their pistols to be all steel and are unwilling to even dare think that polymer might have a place in a pistol.
Other people complain and call them "jammomatics'' and perhaps never tried to figure out why... did they try different types and brands of ammo, were they limpwristing? Of course they would never admit it, if they were.
The Sigma is just as reliable as you make it. Take care of it, find out what it likes to eat (Mine WILL NOT feed Magtech Guardian Golds, but they work fine in my other .40) and don't over-lube it. If it develops a problem, call the manufacturer (like you should with all makes) and get it taken care of. Some people... just like to complain and not do what they know they should do.
Mine shot low... about three inches at 20 feet. I solved this by installing a HiViz fiber-optic front sight designed for a Glock, a bit of filing on the sides and now it heads dead on. That's just part of the fun of owning any make of firearm, making it do what you want it to!