Kachok
Member
Yeah the 6.5 is a tad overpowerd on deer at close range, but it is still within reason, in fact I shot a Florida buck last week at about 40 yd, while I didWell, I get that. Still, you mentioned thatAnd I would agree. But I'd also say that 6.5 is "over-powered" for white-tail at 40 yards--not bad at all, just not ideal, especially as the Swede shines at distance because of the BC and SD of the bullets.
But perhaps we are just talking at cross purposes: you about species at whatever range, and I about most animals in a given terrain (which tends to set the range): not sure I'd change my rifle choice much for white-tail vs moose at 350 yards; and not sure I'd need more than a .30-30 on either up close.
Of course, we don't have much beanfield hunting here in MA.
not need that much punch to put him down it did not do that much meat damage either, I keep it just behind both shoulders at close range. He jumped once and hit the ground dead about 12' from where I shot him.
Yes I am talking about ideal for whatever realistic range you would get a shot from, not that 1,000yd wannabee sniper $#!^ Most game species are taken within 100yd, some more cautious anamals (mule deer for example) tend to the outside of 200 yd, with many older smarter bucks taken at nearly 300. Of course everything depends on terain, but that is the genral idea. Just call it from 30-300 yd VERY few anamals are harvested outside of that range.
Last edited: