if you could only own one, ar15 or garand?

ar15 or m1 garand


  • Total voters
    674
Status
Not open for further replies.
Quality AR without question... more complete and versatile weapon available in more versatile calibers.
 
I think you need both!
New and old technology - really can't go wrong with either.
Support past & present.:D
PKSabre001-1.gif
HRGarand002.jpg

I voted for the Garand:)
 
Last edited:
As awesome as the Garand is, it's kind of like comparing a vacuum tube to a laptop, IMO
RP88

Well the transistor and AR-15 both made big gains in the late 50's and early sixties, shoving aside vacuum tubes and larger calibers. :)

I love older guns but would have to go with the AR over the Garand.
 
this was an epic pole, and i just figured id give any new guys that havent seen it a chance to vote.

i honestly figured the ar would win hands down. its incredible how close it is.
 
If you ever stand in the fox holes of E and F Companies outside Bastogne, Belgium, there is only one answer-especially if you like only classic military rifles.

i would love to take one of those tourist trips over there before im gone and see those places.

all the respect i have to give
 
Couldn't decide between the two so I split the difference and opted for the M1 Carbine instead:D

If I had to the walk the wastelands of a post-apocalyptic future I would have an M1 Carbine slung over my shoulder and not an AR, AK or any other rifle for that matter.

Carbines.gif
 
Last edited:
A quality AR-15.

I can't afford to shoot .30-06...

If I had a Garand, it wouldn't get shot much...it'd be like my Mosin-Nagant, kept for history...
 
didnt Gen. Patton say that "the AR15 is the dooshiest battle implement ever devised", ?
 
FlyinBryan:
You have a wickedly beautiful 'battle rifle'. My first arrived after a friend's trip to the CMP three weeks ago.
This topic seems to exclude ammo prices and reloading can reduce them a fair bit.

The Garand is impressive by itself, and has no need to be customized.
It helped liberate much of the globe in WW2 with no extra gear.

Reid73: True, although our F-105 "Thuds" etc (based at Udorn etc in Thailand?) were required to enter North Vietnam on three designated routes, similar to what we do arriving into larger airports via standard terminal arrival routes (STARs).

And they could not attack Soviet cargo ships in Haiphong Harbour, but one Thud or F-4 pilot zapped the type of Soviet ship which had a load of SA-2 missiles. He was kicked out of the Air Force because of that, but probably saved the lives of some B-52 or TAC crews. My Dad worked with the guy in the US.
These were just a tiny fraction of the rules our forces had to comply with.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top