What we need more than anything else is "our" side not to give the whole gift away for nothing in return.Now all we need is SCOTUS to refuse to hear it.
I think that is a bad idea for a couple of reasons.There still is a pro-gun majority in the Illinois house, when the antis propose some BS bill, we can just tell them to shove it - we'll wait 180 days for constitutional carry
from the Tribune story.“If we need to change the law, let us at least craft a law that is very severely constrained and narrowly tailored so that we don’t invite guns out of control on each of our city’s streets,” Currie said. “I don’t want people out of control wandering the streets with guns that are out of control.”
The Facepalm is strong in that Currie person. :facepalm:brickeyee said:They are already schemcing to makwe it as diffuclt as poissible to get licensed.
“If we need to change the law, let us at least craft a law that is very severely constrained and narrowly tailored so that we don’t invite guns out of control on each of our city’s streets,” Currie said. “I don’t want people out of control wandering the streets with guns that are out of control.”
from the Tribune story.
So, why exactly do you think the pendulum is going to swing to a may issue horror?