Some of the logic here stuns me.
If you want to live in the woods and never ever in your life intend to take advantage of anything paid for by public funds, then have at it. That accounts for exactly zero percent of our population.
By contrast, if you want to take advantage of highways, roads, and streets paid for by public funds, then you can expect some restrictions when you take advantage of the conditions made available to you. After all, that road isn't just yours. It's also mine. You don't get a veto power over me. I don't want to have to pay money to provide a service that you get to use to my disadvantage.
If you disagree, then don't complain if I park right in front of your driveway, blocking your access to the street. If you don't want me to veto you, then don't complain about my vetoing you.
So we all have a right to move within and between states. Absolutely true. But neither the federal government nor any state or local government has any obligation to build highways or roads that make that movement possible. If you want to take advantage of those highways and roads, then don't be surprised if your privilege--not right--to take advantage of those highways and roads has some limitations. For example, don't be surprised if you can't drive as fast as you might like. Think of it this way: I'm paying for the road on which you're driving. I also get to use that road. I don't want some knucklehead driving 150 miles per hour on a road supported by tax dollars that I'm paying. My position on that issue is hardly obnoxious or controversial.
I own firearms and support our rights under the Second Amendment. But the fact that we have some rights under the Second Amendment doesn't mean that we can do whatever we want in regard to our possession of firearms.
I'm a proud, card-carrying member of the American Civil Liberties Union. In fact, my ACLU card identifies me as a "Guardian of Liberty': I've literally paid the dues. But I recognize that the fact that I have a right to speak does not mean that I always have a privilege to speak.
I think that we could all benefit from thinking carefully on the difference between rights and privileges. I have a right to speak. I do not always have a privilege to speak. I have a right to bear arms. I do not always have a privilege to bear arms.
For what it's worth, the ACLU does not take a formal position on the right to bear arms. Maybe it should. But if you're automatically opposed to the ACLU, perhaps you should reconsider. The ACLU is a strong proponent of our First Amendment rights. Your right to advocate for your Second Amendment rights depends fundamentally on your First Amendment rights. If you want to exercise your First Amendment right to advocate in favor of your Second Amendment rights, perhaps you should support the ACLU.