Illinois Members...Why don't we repeal the FOID Card Law?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Jeff White

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Dec 24, 2002
Messages
37,891
Location
Alma Illinois
I just read the complete text of the FOID law. There is a provision for a repeal to be put on the ballot. Why isn't the ISRA, the NRA or any other organization all over this?

Here is the relevant portion of the law:

(430 ILCS 65/16) (from Ch. 38, par. 83‑16)
Sec. 16. When 2% of the number of registered voters in the State desire to pass upon the question of whether the General Assembly should repeal this Act regulating the acquisition, possession and transfer of firearms and firearm ammunition, they shall, at least 78 days before a regular election to be held throughout the State, file in the office of the State Board of Elections, a petition directed to the Board in accordance with the general election law. The petition shall be composed of county petitions from each of the counties throughout the State and each county petition shall contain the signatures of at least 2% of the number of registered voters in the county. The petition shall request that the question "Should the General Assembly repeal the Act entitled 'An Act relating to the acquisition, possession and transfer of firearms and firearm ammunition, to provide a penalty for the violation thereof and to make an appropriation in connection therewith,' approved August 3, 1967, as amended?" be submitted to the voters of the State at the next ensuing State‑wide election at which such question may be acted upon.
(Source: P.A. 81‑1489.)

(430 ILCS 65/16.1) (from Ch. 38, par. 83‑16.1)
Sec. 16.1. A petition for the submission of the proposition shall be in substantially the following form:
To the State Board of Elections
The undersigned, residents and registered voters of the State of Illinois, respectfully petition that you cause to be submitted, in the manner provided by the general election law to the voters of the State of Illinois, at the next State‑wide election, the proposition "Should the General Assembly repeal an Act entitled 'An Act relating to the acquisition, possession and transfer of firearms and firearm ammunition, to provide a penalty for the violation thereof and to make an appropriation in connection therewith', approved August 3, 1967, as amended?"
‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑
‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑
Such petition shall conform to the requirements of the general election law. The Board shall certify the question to the proper election officials who shall submit the question at an election in accordance with the general election law. Upon request of any citizen for a reproduced copy of the petition and paying or tendering to the State Board of Elections the costs of making the copy, the Board shall immediately make, or cause to be made a reproduced copy of such petition. The Board shall also deliver to such person his official certification that such copy is a true copy of the original, stating the day when such original was filed in its office.
(Source: P.A. 81‑1489.)

(430 ILCS 65/16‑3) (from Ch. 38, par. 83‑16.3)
Sec. 16‑3. The Secretary of State shall cause the question to be plainly printed upon separate ballots as follows:
‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑
Should the General Assembly repeal the Act
entitled "An Act relating to the acquisition, YES
possession and transfer of firearms and
firearm ammunition, to provide a penalty ‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑
for the violation thereof and to make an
appropriation in connection therewith", NO
approved August 3, 1967, as amended?
‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑
(Source: P.A. 77‑1819.)
 
Why don't you elect some decent politicians first, since that's the root of the problem and the biggest obstacle to repeal?
 
It's easy to find 2% who will disagree with the FOID law (or the AWB, etc.) but you're screwed once it goes to a straight popular vote, especially with King Daley working hard to get out the cemetary vote.
 
Petitions -

Lot's harder to do than just,,err,,,doing it. My other pet crusade besides getting CCW in ohio is to get either casino gambling or slots in Ohio. It takes man (woman) power and lots and lots and lots and lots of it.

Finding the volunteers could/would be a problem. Both my wife and I gathered signatures for a casino sponsored by a local car mogul. IIRC, he was paying $.05 per signature. Seems to me a full sheet of 100 names/addresses was worth a fin. Anyhow, we *only* needed 50K signatures. In total, IIRC (it's been a long time ago) "we" collected over 200K statewide,,and still fell short of the needed 50k by a hefty margin.

The rules for petitioning are strict also. There's time limits;limits on the wording;limits on who can sign,,,and a bunch more.

Still, the idea does have a lot of merit. I wish you luck with it if you do go foreward.
 
I would do whatever I could, knock on doors, collect signatures, etc.
But, I don't think it would work unless the I$RA gets up to speed and I am not at all impressed with the current I$RA leadership. A rejection of FOID by elected officials might be easier.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top