In Defense of Mossberg Pumps

Status
Not open for further replies.

RaceM

Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2011
Messages
676
Lately there’s been a few discussions regarding issues with Remington’s venerable 870 design, specifically the 870 Express. A comment was made that nobody was sticking up for Mossbergs, so here I go.

I’ve got 2 Remington 870's, a 20 gauge for the wife and a 12 for me. I had some minor issues with loading 3" shells into mine which I have since corrected. Over all I got no whines on the 870 Express.

I’ve also got 2 Mossbergs, an 835 (used) and a 500 (new). I like both of ‘em. Here’s why.

Field stripping a Mossy is a breeze. I do like the single take-down pin vs. the double on the Remmy. Reassembly I also find a bit easier on the Mossbergs. Yeah, the interruptor and shell stop have to be held in place while reinserting the trigger group. However, I have less hassle with that than holding the bolt and carrier on the action bars of the Remmy, sliding that whole mess in, then pushing in on the interruptor and stop to get the bolt to slide home. Is that a personal preference? Yes it is.

Where I think the Mossies really shine is the receiver itself. I like the larger loading port on the bottom, as well as the ability to unload the magazine, one shell at a time, just by pushing in on the shell stop. I’m also a fan of the larger ejection port of the Mossbergs. If I want to do the shell swap drill (dump whatever came out of the mag and sub in a slug round) the unwanted shell falls right out, no muss. On the Remington I do sometimes get hang-ups in the ejection port of the round I’m trying to get rid of. It’s also easier to drop the slug round into the Mossy.

The locking action of the Mossberg is rock solid. It’s either locked or it ain’t. I’ve found that on the Remingtons the slide will come back a hair once the hammer is down, and that partially blocks the lifter so you can’t get a shell in the mag tube. Yeah, I know, training and familiarization will get around that but in a high-stress encounter sometimes t&f goes out the window. Been there.

Some complain that the Mossy actions are stiff. Yes they are. I personally find that reassuring. I haven’t yet short-shucked a pump, but if it ever happens to me I’d be willing to bet it does so with one of the Remingtons. The Mossberg action can be slicked up a bit to make it smoother, but it’ll always take more effort than the Remington and I don’t mind that. It makes me slow down. Instead of shickshick bang, it’s shick(pause)shick bang. If I need real volume of fire then a pump shotty is the wrong gun to start with.

Some have complained about the safety being on the receiver instead of the trigger guard. I say so what? Training and familiarization are there for a reason. Mostly I run with the mag loaded, chamber empty, safety off, so I don’t really care WHERE it’s located.

If I have any whines on the Mossbergs it’s the stock. That long LOP maybe great for some folks but on me it didn’t fit right at all, and combined with the relatively stiff butt pad it made for painful shooting. Nothing there that some time with a hacksaw and a new LimbSaver pad didn’t fix.

So there ya has it, my take on Mossberg pumps. Inexpensive, easy to maintain, and they won’t rust up like an Express. I’m not bashing the 870 here, but if I had my druthers I’d probably grab one of the Mossbergs if I had to bail out with only one shotgun.
 
I've been contemplating a first shotgun for a while, and I keep coming back to the Mossberg action, partly because of the top-mount safety ... I have a dislike of crossbolt safeties, so it appeals.

Which model would you recommend if I wanted a wood stock and full length mag tube?
 
You forgot to mention that the Mossbergs have a large choice in barrel options.

As long as the Mag tube length matches up you're good to go.

Also the safety can be used by left or right handers.

and the forearm release is easy to get to without the shooter changing their grip on the weapon.
 
Last edited:
I actually find the action of the Mossberg more positive feeling than that of the 870 even if the required effort is higher.

I really like the fact that the Mossberg's shell elevator stays out of the way when loading.

Another thing I like about them is how light they feel in comparison, even the 20" 590A1 seems a lot lighter and less muzzle heavy than my 870P does.
 
BigFatDave- If I were you I'd just go to the Mossberg website and browse. Likely enough you'll find something there that'd do you. While I love the look & feel of wood furniture most of my toys have got plastic on 'em cuz I live in a rainforest. You might also look on GunBroker or other gun sale sites to find the right model for you. If all else fails there's always your local gun or pawn shop. Far as I know the 500 is the only one that has a full length magazine.
 
Racem, was there any Mossie BASHING going on that I need to know about?

I haven't seen any.

A large part of my Mod duties,besides herding cats, is stopping any of the "Mine is better" stuff as well as eliminating the dreck that's bashing other folk's choices.
 
I wasn't bashing any other make dave just stating the positives of the 500's controls and functions.

The remingtons,winchesters,and brownings are all good guns.

but most of them (except for models on the used market) fetch a hefty price,but all mentioned are top quality.
 
I owned a Rem 870 Express, worked for me, didn't like the finish, just tore up my rags. Went for the M500, and haven't looked back. I'm a southpaw and the safety is great. I enjoy the lighter aluminum receiver, lack of loading gate, extra round capacity in field configuration, 3 chokes, dual extractors, smooth blued finish, dual beads.

In the future, I will spring for a Wingmaster however for clays because it's heavier with the steel receiver and soaks up more recoil on those days for extended shooting at the clay range. The Mossberg is a reliable, functional, affordable weapon and is a jack of all trades, but since it's not super pretty, I would use it for hunting and not worry about scratching or denting it etc.
 
...nobody was sticking up for Mossbergs...
Someone only needs to 'stick up for' Mossberg if someone else is bad mouthing them. Show us where that's happening. I've never really seen that taking place here to much of an extent. Sure, the ergos, fit, controls of the 870 might be better for one individual over the next. But that's not bad mouthing Mossberg because there are enough shooters that prefer the ergos, fit, and controls of those Mossbergs over that of the Remingtons.

What I think you mean to say is that the Remington fan boys are talking about their Remingtons, but you want to read a thread from the Mossberg fan boys talking about their Mossbergs.

I don't own a Mossberg, neither do I own an 870, but if someone starts hating on one or the other, I wouldn't find it difficult to 'stick up for' them both.
 
The 500 I had looked like a steaming pile, but functioned flawlessly. It had been a C&O railroad gun before I bought it for $65,IIRC.

The sole reason I sold it was because both my other pumps and the ones at work were 870s. Didn't want to mess up my "Chops".
 
I don't think Mossberg's need any sticking up for, they a solid pieces of equipment. I run into a lot of 870 guys that think it's the only shotgun worth buying. I like the ergos on the Mossbergs better.

Mossberg also does a great job of churning out dozens of relatively unnecessary variants to make sure that at least one catches your eye... dang it :).
 
To any and all concerned: nope, no Mossy bashing that I'm aware of. Just throwing my nickel's worth into the discussions since I own both Rem's and Mossies. If I've somehow offended that wasn't my intent.
 
BASH - I hate ported barrels, and Mossberg seems to be in love with them. Other than that, nothing wrong with them that I know of. That's why they make different guns, so we can argue.
 
I own both Mossberg 600 and 500 also a pretty Rem wingmaster the Rem will definately hold its resale value better in my case cause it seldom leaves the safe and dont have a mark on it. I learned on my old 600 which my father bought for me when I was 12 years old. Nothing against the Rem it is just not instinctive for me to operate.If I continue trying to take the safety off the REM ill rub a hole in the bluing where it should be but it aint there for the life of me I just cant remember that they hid it in front of the trigger.
It really is a great gun so ill keep it to give to a niece or nephew one day.
T
 
I've used each as duty shotguns for about 2 decades and have zero complaints with either. I actually prefer the safety on the Mossberg.
 
My first shotgun was a Mossy 500 20ga, and it served my needs for almost two decades and probably saw 5K rounds through it during that time. Not heavy use, but use nevertheless.

The fact that I've found myself more comfortable with the 870 or Ithaca 37 doesn't take anything away from the 500 at all.
 
500s are good and a lot of gun for the money. I just like 870s better than anything else...
 
A funny thing about all of the 870 vs 500 threads is how different they can be. We have one it seems at least twice a month. Sometimes the 500 gets lots of praise and the 870 bashers have a field day. Someone else can ask the same question 2 weeks later and most of the responses will be completely opposite. It depends on which posters respond on any given day.
 
I currently don't own either.......but I want one. Went to the LGS this afternoon, they had both sitting on a floor display that you could pick em both up and drool over.
The MOSSBERG was the #50516 "500" for $279.00.
The REMINGTON EXPRESS #5077 for $289.00.

Both fine guns.....I DO like the safety on the MOSSBERG better....
I could put my thumb on the safety and pull the trigger at the same time! Can't do that with the REMINGTON......not a big deal.....but the thumb and trigger finger each have a responsiblity, with the Remington the trigger finger needs to perform 2 functions unless you can train to have another finger work the safety.

I also noticed that my finger would get "snagged" while loading shells into the chamber, didn't happen with the MOSSBERG. :cool:

Either way, that's not a deal breaker for me. What does matter is the quality of the finish. The EXPRESS had "pits" or "spots" on the blueing, don't know why, but it was not as good as the Mossberg. I do understand that the EXPRESS has some sort of "finish" issue as well as occasional "feeding-ejecting" issues.

On the other hand, the MOSSBERG fore end was not as tight as the Remington. I understand the MILITARY required that to assure the pump would operate in mud, sand, dirt and muck.....

I'm sure both would give good service for thousands of rounds and years to come................

BUT........the funny thing is...............
I've examined the LEGACY MP ESCORT, WEATHERBY TACTICAL,
and TRISTAR along with the REMINGTON and MOSSBERG......
the TURKISH shotguns "feel" more substantial, more solid, and VERY smooth action (just like Mossberg and Remington), and seem to be better quality!

I really hate that because I try to buy AMERICAN every chance I get, (HELL, I own 3 AMERICAN vehicles!) but DAMN, these imports are nothing to sneer at! :banghead:
 
My only gripe about the Mossberg 500 is the plastic safety button. It always breaks, Mossberg knows it breaks, but they refuse to replace it in production with a steel safety button. Other than that, the design is solid and very serviceable for the money.
 
I've shot both and owned both, both are excelent, I do miss my 870 the most tho that just me.
 
I have a 550 that's seen 27 years of use and have had zero problems with it. It's been light years ahead of the S&W 916 it replaced (and I will bash that one cuz it was junk.) It even has the same plastic safety it came with. That part is notorious for breaking, usually in cold weather. (Mossberg has an aluminum one for $12.)

Some of the newer ones I've seen had issues like poorly adjusted shell stops and ejectors that break after a few boxes of shells. Those are QC problems. The basic design is solid.

Presently I use an 870 most of the time because it fits me better but I won't sell the 500 any time soon.
 
Last edited:
I have a 500A Combo that I've had for the past 13 years now. It has close to 10,000 rounds down the pipe. Like previously mentioned in this thread, I also very much prefer the pump release, safety location and lighter receiver. The end result is a shotgun that I am able to deploy much quicker than any other design, without any significant changes in grip. The layout just works perfectly for me. The lighter weight makes it swing much better from target to target, and yet I don't notice any real difference in recoil characteristics.

In those 13 years, it was only two years ago that I ran into "problems" with the 500A. The welded end cap of the magazine tube broke loose. This made barrel changes a royal pain. It was still doable, just a pain. Mossberg sent me a new one for free! I also ran into FTE problems with Federal aluminum rimmed shells. It appears that the dual extractors and their spring tension are too much for the soft aluminum rims, at least this is the case in my shotgun. No biggie, I just avoid shooting the ammo with aluminum rims. Finally, the magazine spring felt like it was loosing its tension. Poor little fella only lasted 11 years ;) The only problem I've ever had with the safety was the screw backing out after several years of use. A little blue loctite and screwing it back in put it back in business.

In my experience, Mossbergs are workhorses in the same vein as the 870.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top