usmarine0352_2005
member
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2005
- Messages
- 2,796
.
I read somewhere that she would not be ruling on this case if it is agreed to be ruled on.
Is this true?
And if so, could it actually be bad?
Some say that since she is anti-2nd Amendment and is replacing an anti-2nd Amendment judge, it's a wash.
However, what if she decided to rule in favor of Incorporation and the 2nd Amendment?
Then she would be an extra vote that we could surely use. Many times a SCOTUS judge has not ruled the way some thought they would.
.
I read somewhere that she would not be ruling on this case if it is agreed to be ruled on.
Is this true?
And if so, could it actually be bad?
Some say that since she is anti-2nd Amendment and is replacing an anti-2nd Amendment judge, it's a wash.
However, what if she decided to rule in favor of Incorporation and the 2nd Amendment?
Then she would be an extra vote that we could surely use. Many times a SCOTUS judge has not ruled the way some thought they would.
.