International Small Arms Proliferation

Status
Not open for further replies.

LiquidTension

Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2003
Messages
2,881
Location
SC
Does anybody have any good links or sources of info about this topic? I'm writing a position paper on it for a polisci class and would appreciate any info y'all can supply. The topic is fairly broad, but I can be as specific as I want. I'd especially like some sources from people like IANSA and MMM that blame the US for all the world's problems. Basically, I want to show that the proliferation of small arms is a good thing for free countries, and that the bad guys will get their guns anyway. The topic had to be broader than just the US because the class is International Foreign Relations.

Help and suggestions always welcome :)
 
Would anybody happen to have a link to the transcript of the debate between the Ms. Peters and LaPierre? There is an "edited" transcript on IANSA's site, but I can't find the whole thing. Naturally, the edited one is done up to make Peters look better, but she still got crushed by LaPierre. I'm just interested to know what IANSA doesn't want you to know....
 
You might want to look up some info on a town in Pakistan called Darra Adam Khel. It's a curious town where the majority of citizens make their living in the small arms trade- either making firearms, ammunition, or recycling the same. There are no police, and the Pakistani government rarely discusses the place.

Interestingly enough, there is virtually no crime.

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=Darra+Adam+Khel&btnG=Search
 
Y'know, the hypocrisy of the UN discussions really bugs me. Various governments--our own, included--make money from sales of all manner and sizes of armaments, world wide, to other governments and "legal" arms dealers. All kinds of go-bangs then wind up in the hands of Bad Guys.

The UN solution includes denying personal ownership of firearms to Good Guys, the "mere citizens" who aren't government employees.

Sound familiar?

Art
 
It's all about control and revenue

UN and other organizations don't want arms sales on a small scale. (PERIOD)

On a big scale they either approve, or look the other way from large sales to governments. The IMF/world bank lends money for improvements which gets spent on arms, bribes, kickbacks, whatever. Only a pittance is actually spent on improvements for cover and photo-ops. Everyone is happy, everyone is dipping in the till.

Of course, since very little is really spent on improving infrastructure, no economic development takes place in the country of benefit. There's no revenue to pay the IMF/Worldbank loans back. So, they just lend more money and guess what? Everyone's happy again.

At some time this process just won't work anymore (DUH!). So the next step is to "forgive" the loans to give the country the opportunity to prosper, or whatever. The problem with forgiving the loans is that someone else has to pay them (the IMF/Worldbank never really forgives anything) so industrial nations with actual revenue hang the bailout on their taxpayers.

Shortly after everything's forgiven, the process starts over.

And you all thought we had crooks here. People at the world government level make our crooks look like cheap pickpockets.
 
The Federation of American Scientists, http://www.fas.org/main/home.jsp has a lot of stuff along the lines of what you're looking for. You should also google for the Congressional Research Service's "Conventional Arms Transfers to Developing Nations" (sales are down for the third year in a row.)


ETA: fascinating link; US exports of "semiautomatic assault rifles" for fiscal year 2003 with dollar value-
http://fas.org/asmp/profiles/655-2003/rpt655_2003_assaultrifles.pdf

Germany got 1 for $750. :rolleyes:
 
" Interestingly enough, there is virtually no crime "
except the one where the local cops arrest you outside the city limit, confiscate your souvenir shade-of-a-tree gun, take it back to the vendor, and get paid off.
 
That Kopel piece is exactly what I needed, thanks very much!

As a matter of fact, everyone should read it. Not because it will change anyone's mind on this board, but because it's very informative and supplies yet more historical facts to throw at the antis.
 
How come my small arms never proliferate??? I store them in the same cabinet and give them privacy and everything. Maybe it's the glass door...

:evil:


(I'm SO sorry to be off topic. But someone had to say it. I couldn't resist.)
 
I dunno, every now and then I open up the safe and there's a new toy in there. I wonder how they get there, considering I'm the only one that has a key? Hmm, maybe those memory lapses are more of a blessing than I thought :D
 
another interesting case is operation Dragon Fire:


"ASSAULT WEAPONS" FOR U.S.

But of all the decisions, waivers and export liberalizations
executed on behalf of the Chinese by the Clinton White House,
none rivals what the administration did for Wang Jun, the
princeling chairman of China's state owned arms conglomerate,
Poly Technologies. For years, China had been doing a land office
business exporting to the U.S. semi-automatic rifles and ammo
made by Poly and another arms manufacturer, Norinco. Reportedly,
the gun trade was worth hundreds of millions of dollars annually
to the PRC. But suddenly in 1994, there was a problem: the
Clinton Assault Weapons Ban. Overnight, China's weapons cash cow
evaporated.

Not to worry. According to a Scripps Howard report by Michael
Hedges, which ran on the front page of the March 14, 1997 edition
of the Arkansas Democrat Gazette, the Clinton administration
granted Wang Jun's Poly Technologies importation permits to flood
America with over 100,000 semi-automatic weapons and millions of
rounds of ammunition -- despite the president's own cherished gun
ban. That was on Feb. 2, 1996 -- just days before Clinton issued
the first satellite waivers for Loral Corp.

It gets worse. On Feb. 6, just four days after the assault
weapon waivers were issued, Wang Jun was ushered into the White
House for a personal meeting with Bill Clinton. Wang's escort
was Yah Lin "Charlie" Trie, who had laundered over $600,000 from
Chinese sources for the Clinton Defense Fund. Combined with his
campaign donations to the DNC, Trie's total contributions to
Clinton coffers topped the million dollar mark in 1996. For that
kind of money, it's a good bet Charlie Trie could bring anybody
he wanted to the White House.

And Charlie Trie wasn't Wang's only solid White House reference.
Charlie had worked with longtime F.O.B. Ernest Green to get Wang
a U.S. visa, though Wang conveniently forgot to mention that he
was a Communist arms dealer on the visa application. Had he
disclosed that fact, Wang Jun would never have been let in the
country, let alone the White House. The day after Wang's visit
with Clinton, Ernie Green's wife donated $50,000 to the DNC.

Except for these import waivers, issued two years after Poly's
rifles had been banned at the president's own direction, there
would have been no legal U.S. market for Wang Jun's guns.

Michael Hedges interviewed lawyers involved in negotiating the
deal, nearly all of whom were stunned when Poly Technologies got
the exclusive approval. "All of a sudden there was a
breakthrough. I can't account for it.", said one attorney.
Another admitted that the Clinton administration had been tying
other arms importers in knots to keep guns out of the country
because the president was opposed. He described the abrupt
turnaround in U.S. import policy as "highly suspicious". And
this was from a guy who was working to make this deal happen.

Last year, Hedges told me that his evidence included signed
copies of the importation permits for Wang Jun's guns. Between
the on-the-record interviews and the documentation, his expose
was rock solid. Yet, despite the fact that the implications of
his report were absolutely staggering, only one New York or
Washington paper thought its readers were entitled to this news.
Eleven days later, The New York Daily News followed up on the
Wang Jun 100,000 gun story.

News Columnist Michael Daly managed to uncover the destination
for Wang's 100,000 guns: a Detroit firm which investigators have
linked to the Chinese Armed Police. The Chinese Armed Police
used similar assault rifles to mow down demonstrators in
Tiananmen Square in 1989.

The massive gun shipment would have gone through, flooding
America's cities with weapons ruled inappropriate by the Clinton
administration, but the deal was suspended in the wake of the
aforementioned COSCO connected smuggling operation - which was
short-circuited by federal agents just weeks after Wang Jun's
importation waivers were granted. On the night of March 18,
1996, undercover Customs and BATF agents accepted delivery of
guns smuggled aboard the COSCO ship Empress Phoenix, as part of
an ongoing sting operation dubbed "Dragon Fire." The undercover
agents had lured the Chinese into making a trial shipment of
Chinese machine guns: a dry run set up to establish a working
relationship before the Chinese granted access to their full
inventory. Besides the smuggled guns, which they recommended for
the California street gang market, the Chinese operatives
explained that they were ready to sell everything from grenade
launchers to shoulder fired Red Parakeet surface to air missiles,
which they boasted could "take out a 747". (Coincidentally, a
Boeing 747 was taken out over the skies of Long Island just
months later.) That March night, federal agents secretly
unpacked COSCO crates containing 2,000 Poly Technologies AK-47's
delivered from the hold of the Empress Phoenix. It was the
largest seizure of fully operational automatic weapons in the
history of U. S. law enforcement.

http://www.cnn.com/US/9605/23/china.arms/

http://www.ak47world.com/clinton.html

http://www.stanley2002.org/stories/090403/09040332.htm
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top