Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Is my thinking right on this?

Discussion in 'Handloading and Reloading' started by SC_Dave, Dec 20, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. SC_Dave

    SC_Dave Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2012
    Messages:
    264
    Location:
    Hickory, NC
    115 gr 9mm RN FMJ

    Difference in Hornady and Precision Delta is length of bullet;

    Hornady .5400
    PD .5650

    This is the only difference I see in the two bullets.

    With Hornady I was using 4.5gr of Win231 (this is mid range per Hornady 9th) with a COL of 1.100 (this is per Hornady 9th)

    Can I use this same data with PD with a COL of 1.350? Am I thinking right or way off?
    David

    PS: I am using this for plinking and self-defense practice.
     
  2. rcmodel

    rcmodel Member in memoriam

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2007
    Messages:
    59,082
    Location:
    Eastern KS
    Length of the bullet doesn't matter.

    Ogive profile does.

    The shorter Hornady bullet probably has a more blunt secant ogive, and may need to be seated deeper to prevent jamming into the rifling leade.

    You need to determine your OAL using the new PD bullets by doing the "Plunk test" in your barrels chamber.

    Whatever length just misses the rifling leade is the correct OAL for that bullet in that barrel.

    Your load is light enough OAL will not matter.

    rc
     
  3. SC_Dave

    SC_Dave Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2012
    Messages:
    264
    Location:
    Hickory, NC
    Again RC you have helped me and I appreciate it!!!!
    David
     
  4. MCMXI

    MCMXI Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2008
    Messages:
    7,216
    Location:
    NW Montana
    How did you come up with COAL of 1.350"?

    0.5650" - 0.5400" = 0.025" therefore I would have thought that your COAL would be 1.100" + 0.025" = 1.125". That way you would have the same internal case volume for both loads and the COAL is well within "standard" specs.
     
  5. SC_Dave

    SC_Dave Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2012
    Messages:
    264
    Location:
    Hickory, NC
    You know when I typed an COL of 1.350 that seemed long but I didn't catch it. That would have been 1/4 of an inch longer. :banghead: My mistake.
     
  6. Walkalong

    Walkalong Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2006
    Messages:
    46,718
    Location:
    Alabama
    Assuming the same OAL for each bullet, the PD would seat .025 deeper, which would be significant if you were close to max. At 4.5 Gr of W-231 you will be fine, but will see a velocity increase.

    An increase in OAL to 1.125 with the PD would pretty well even things out.

    I usually run 115 Gr RN bullets in 9MM at 1.130 to 1.135 OAL.
     
  7. SC_Dave

    SC_Dave Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2012
    Messages:
    264
    Location:
    Hickory, NC
    Thanks Walkalong, good info!
    David
     
  8. Centaur 1

    Centaur 1 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2010
    Messages:
    193
    Location:
    Florida's Space Coast
    I smelt lead from an indoor range so I get to compare a lot of different bullets. 9mm's seems to have the largest variation in length for bullets that weigh the same. When you have a load that you like, calculate how much of the bullet is inside the case and duplicate that number with the new bullet. Then do the plunk test that RC mentioned, and just like he said the ogive will determine if you can chamber the round. I have a Ranch Dog mold that uses a tangent ogive, even though the bullet is very short it has to be seated deeper.
     
  9. 4895

    4895 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2011
    Messages:
    732
    Location:
    Tucson, Arizona
    I would seat them at 1.125" with a 4.5 gr charge of 231 and call it good.

    Might want to bump the charge up to 4.6 or 4.7 if the lighter ones work well for ya.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page