Big Mike
Member
This is a serious question that I have, related to the market conditions that seem to be present. Regarding the huge net profit by EM, I got to thinking about how the gun industry benefits from the anxiety that seems to be tied to the political races.
I assert that as a person not in the gun industry, but as a customer, that they more likely than not, have better business (more sales) when there are threats of regulation or actual regulation than when there isn't.
Consider the AWB of 1994. I understand that the regulation that reduced the size of a magazines capacity drove the industry to engineer a product that meet the legal standard of the day, 10 rounds. Hence, we saw a market with new pistols that were enginered for this capacity. Even if not 10 rounds, there seemed to be a lot more choices of pistols out there designed predominantly for concealed carry.
Fast forward to today. How many ads, posts and talk is out there today projecting doom for gun owner if candidate "A" or "B" is elected?
I see, "Buy it while you can!", "Fire Sale, buy NOW!", Don't let "!?!" take your guns, SALE!" much more lately, and I can't help but feel the pull (push?) of considering the language and reaching for the wallet. But then I think...ammo is more expensive now than a year ago, I don't see any lower prices on any handguns/rifles I've looked at recently (even used are not as cheap as they've been, here on FL), even police trade-in pistols are not the deals they once were just a couple years ago.
In a slower economy, prices usually flatten, then drop. But consider the market conditions again, and I surmise the message out there by many is driving anxiety up with the prices. I'll say to that as far as I can tell, the market is saturated with weapons citizens can buy. Here I'm drawing a loose comparision to oil and fuel prices.
I respect someone's right to own a business and make money, but can you give a brother a break?
Note: I have no plans to buy/horde higher capacity magazines or semi-automatic assault weapons currently legal. I'd like to reload to avoid the whole retail ammo thing, but I haven't brought myself to get into it yet.
Thoughts? Mike
I assert that as a person not in the gun industry, but as a customer, that they more likely than not, have better business (more sales) when there are threats of regulation or actual regulation than when there isn't.
Consider the AWB of 1994. I understand that the regulation that reduced the size of a magazines capacity drove the industry to engineer a product that meet the legal standard of the day, 10 rounds. Hence, we saw a market with new pistols that were enginered for this capacity. Even if not 10 rounds, there seemed to be a lot more choices of pistols out there designed predominantly for concealed carry.
Fast forward to today. How many ads, posts and talk is out there today projecting doom for gun owner if candidate "A" or "B" is elected?
I see, "Buy it while you can!", "Fire Sale, buy NOW!", Don't let "!?!" take your guns, SALE!" much more lately, and I can't help but feel the pull (push?) of considering the language and reaching for the wallet. But then I think...ammo is more expensive now than a year ago, I don't see any lower prices on any handguns/rifles I've looked at recently (even used are not as cheap as they've been, here on FL), even police trade-in pistols are not the deals they once were just a couple years ago.
In a slower economy, prices usually flatten, then drop. But consider the market conditions again, and I surmise the message out there by many is driving anxiety up with the prices. I'll say to that as far as I can tell, the market is saturated with weapons citizens can buy. Here I'm drawing a loose comparision to oil and fuel prices.
I respect someone's right to own a business and make money, but can you give a brother a break?
Note: I have no plans to buy/horde higher capacity magazines or semi-automatic assault weapons currently legal. I'd like to reload to avoid the whole retail ammo thing, but I haven't brought myself to get into it yet.
Thoughts? Mike