The Unknown User
Member
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2007
- Messages
- 712
lol at the "DO NOT PRESS"
rofl
rofl
There are Supreme Court rulings effectively asserting that the 2nd Amendment doesn't grant a right to keep and bear nukes.
. Oh, THAT makes me feel warm and fuzzy!The Reed College Reactor Facility was established in 1968 and is the only reactor operated primarily by undergraduates
Yes.Is there an actual law that says a private citizen cannot own a nuke?
I don't think there is. I simply think that if the sole legal owner (the US .gov) sold it to you, there would be technically no law broken provided you paid the tax.
And don't think they're kidding:TITLE 42 > CHAPTER 23 > Division A > SUBCHAPTER VIII > § 2122
§ 2122. Prohibitions governing atomic weapons
(a) It shall be unlawful, except as provided in section 2121 of this title, for any person, inside or outside of the United States, to knowingly participate in the development of, manufacture, produce, transfer, acquire, receive, possess, import, export, or use, or possess and threaten to use, any atomic weapon. Nothing in this section shall be deemed to modify the provisions of section 2051 (a) or 2131 of this title.
TITLE 42 > CHAPTER 23 > Division A > SUBCHAPTER XVII > § 2272
§ 2272. Violation of specific sections
(a) Whoever willfully violates, attempts to violate, or conspires to violate, any provision of sections [1] 2077 or 2131 of this title, or whoever unlawfully interferes, attempts to interfere, or conspires to interfere with any recapture or entry under section 2138 of this title, shall, upon conviction thereof, be punished by a fine of not more than $10,000 or by imprisonment for not more than ten years, or both, except that whoever commits such an offense with intent to injure the United States or with intent to secure an advantage to any foreign nation shall, upon conviction thereof, be punished by imprisonment for life, or by imprisonment for any term of years or a fine of not more than $20,000 or both.
(b) Any person who violates, or attempts or conspires to violate, section 2122 of this title shall be fined not more than $2,000,000 and sentenced to a term of imprisonment not less than 25 years or to imprisonment for life. Any person who, in the course of a violation of section 2122 of this title, uses, attempts or conspires to use, or possesses and threatens to use, any atomic weapon shall be fined not more than $2,000,000 and imprisoned for not less than 30 years or imprisoned for life. If the death of another results from a person’s violation of section 2122 of this title, the person shall be fined not more than $2,000,000 and punished by imprisonment for life.
....It shall be unlawful, except as provided in section 2121 of this title.....
Licensing of production facilities and supply to DOD, mostly.P.S. What is the excemption in sec 2121?
For starters, his home-owner's insurance company would drop him like a hot rock. Everyone on the street will shun him. Business owners in town will refuse to do business with him--which includes utilities, roads, groceries and doctors. In the end he'll either get rid of it or move somewhere else.
2 words: "Mexican border"The fastest way to leave this earth would be to attempt to smuggle a nuclear device into this country.
It's inferential, but US v Miller reads in part:Which ones?
This is generally understood to set a standard that weapons protected by the Second Amendment are "military equipment" suitable for "the common defense." This would seem to include any arms that can and might reasonably be carried by a soldier, but to exclude heavy artillery, missiles, and nuclear explosives.In the absence of any evidence tending to show that possession or use of a [sawed-off shotgun] at this time has some reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia, we cannot say that the Second Amendment guarantees the right to keep and bear such an instrument. Certainly it is not within judicial notice that this weapon is any part of the ordinary military equipment or that its use could contribute to the common defense.
When you say "imagine them with a nuke," you're WAY jumping the gun. How exactly did they get it? Answer: they basically can't. It's a sophisticated piece of technology--any raving nut-job in a turban can't make one in his basement. And it's hideously expensive, because it's so sophisticated. And the folks who make centrifuges, or mine uranium, or fabricate machinery to the necessary tolerances, will be strangely reluctant to sell to just any hairy, smelly guy with a knife between his teeth who screams, "Give me your catalog NOW, infidel dog!"Imagine someone like the Earth Liberation Front, or Al Qaeda, with nuclear weapons. I don't think the potential shunning of their neighbors is going to discourage them.